Suppr超能文献

运用“未挽救失败率”来识别中低高收入国家术后护理的国际差异:一项针对择期手术的 7 天队列研究。

Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery.

机构信息

Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.

Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):258-266. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex185.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and impact of postoperative complications are poorly described. Failure-to-rescue, the rate of death following complications, is an important quality measure for perioperative care but has not been investigated across multiple health care systems.

METHODS

We analysed data collected during the International Surgical Outcomes Study, an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Hospitals were ranked by quintiles according to surgical procedural volume (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest). For each quintile we assessed in-hospital complications rates, mortality, and failure-to-rescue. We repeated this analysis ranking hospitals by risk-adjusted complication rates (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest).

RESULTS

A total of 44 814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 low-, middle-, and high-income countries were available for analysis. Of these, 7508 (17%) developed one or more postoperative complication, with 207 deaths in hospital (0.5%), giving an overall failure-to-rescue rate of 2.8%. When hospitals were ranked in quintiles by procedural volume, we identified a three-fold variation in mortality (Q1: 0.6% vs Q5: 0.2%) and a two-fold variation in failure-to-rescue (Q1: 3.6% vs Q5: 1.7%). Ranking hospitals in quintiles by risk-adjusted complication rate further confirmed the presence of important variations in failure-to-rescue, indicating differences between hospitals in the risk of death among patients after they develop complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of failure-to-rescue rates across health care systems suggests the presence of preventable postoperative deaths. Using such metrics, developing nations could benefit from a data-driven approach to quality improvement, which has proved effective in high-income countries.

摘要

背景

术后并发症的发生率和影响描述不足。并发症后的抢救失败率(即并发症后死亡的比率)是围手术期护理的一个重要质量指标,但尚未在多个医疗保健系统中进行调查。

方法

我们分析了国际手术结局研究(一项对接受择期住院手术的成年人进行的国际 7 天队列研究)中收集的数据。根据手术程序量(Q1 最低至 Q5 最高)将医院分为五组。对于每个五分位数,我们评估了住院并发症发生率、死亡率和抢救失败率。我们通过风险调整后的并发症发生率(Q1 最低至 Q5 最高)对医院进行重新排名,并重复了这项分析。

结果

共有来自 27 个低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的 474 家医院的 44814 名患者可用于分析。其中 7508 名(17%)患者发生了 1 种或多种术后并发症,207 人在医院死亡(0.5%),总体抢救失败率为 2.8%。当医院按手术量分为五分位数时,我们发现死亡率存在三倍的差异(Q1:0.6% vs Q5:0.2%),抢救失败率存在两倍的差异(Q1:3.6% vs Q5:1.7%)。按风险调整后的并发症发生率对医院进行五分位数排名进一步证实了抢救失败率存在重要差异,这表明在患者发生并发症后,医院之间存在死亡风险的差异。

结论

比较不同医疗保健系统的抢救失败率表明存在可预防的术后死亡。利用这些指标,发展中国家可以从数据驱动的质量改进方法中受益,这种方法在高收入国家已被证明是有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验