• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用“未挽救失败率”来识别中低高收入国家术后护理的国际差异:一项针对择期手术的 7 天队列研究。

Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery.

机构信息

Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.

Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):258-266. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex185.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aex185
PMID:28854536
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and impact of postoperative complications are poorly described. Failure-to-rescue, the rate of death following complications, is an important quality measure for perioperative care but has not been investigated across multiple health care systems.

METHODS

We analysed data collected during the International Surgical Outcomes Study, an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective inpatient surgery. Hospitals were ranked by quintiles according to surgical procedural volume (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest). For each quintile we assessed in-hospital complications rates, mortality, and failure-to-rescue. We repeated this analysis ranking hospitals by risk-adjusted complication rates (Q1 lowest to Q5 highest).

RESULTS

A total of 44 814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 low-, middle-, and high-income countries were available for analysis. Of these, 7508 (17%) developed one or more postoperative complication, with 207 deaths in hospital (0.5%), giving an overall failure-to-rescue rate of 2.8%. When hospitals were ranked in quintiles by procedural volume, we identified a three-fold variation in mortality (Q1: 0.6% vs Q5: 0.2%) and a two-fold variation in failure-to-rescue (Q1: 3.6% vs Q5: 1.7%). Ranking hospitals in quintiles by risk-adjusted complication rate further confirmed the presence of important variations in failure-to-rescue, indicating differences between hospitals in the risk of death among patients after they develop complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of failure-to-rescue rates across health care systems suggests the presence of preventable postoperative deaths. Using such metrics, developing nations could benefit from a data-driven approach to quality improvement, which has proved effective in high-income countries.

摘要

背景

术后并发症的发生率和影响描述不足。并发症后的抢救失败率(即并发症后死亡的比率)是围手术期护理的一个重要质量指标,但尚未在多个医疗保健系统中进行调查。

方法

我们分析了国际手术结局研究(一项对接受择期住院手术的成年人进行的国际 7 天队列研究)中收集的数据。根据手术程序量(Q1 最低至 Q5 最高)将医院分为五组。对于每个五分位数,我们评估了住院并发症发生率、死亡率和抢救失败率。我们通过风险调整后的并发症发生率(Q1 最低至 Q5 最高)对医院进行重新排名,并重复了这项分析。

结果

共有来自 27 个低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的 474 家医院的 44814 名患者可用于分析。其中 7508 名(17%)患者发生了 1 种或多种术后并发症,207 人在医院死亡(0.5%),总体抢救失败率为 2.8%。当医院按手术量分为五分位数时,我们发现死亡率存在三倍的差异(Q1:0.6% vs Q5:0.2%),抢救失败率存在两倍的差异(Q1:3.6% vs Q5:1.7%)。按风险调整后的并发症发生率对医院进行五分位数排名进一步证实了抢救失败率存在重要差异,这表明在患者发生并发症后,医院之间存在死亡风险的差异。

结论

比较不同医疗保健系统的抢救失败率表明存在可预防的术后死亡。利用这些指标,发展中国家可以从数据驱动的质量改进方法中受益,这种方法在高收入国家已被证明是有效的。

相似文献

1
Use of failure-to-rescue to identify international variation in postoperative care in low-, middle- and high-income countries: a 7-day cohort study of elective surgery.运用“未挽救失败率”来识别中低高收入国家术后护理的国际差异:一项针对择期手术的 7 天队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):258-266. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex185.
2
Improving mortality following emergent surgery in older patients requires focus on complication rescue.提高老年急诊手术患者的生存率需要关注并发症的抢救。
Ann Surg. 2013 Oct;258(4):614-7; discussion 617-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a5021d.
3
Hospital Variation in Mortality After Inpatient Pediatric Surgery.住院儿童外科手术后的医院死亡率变化。
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e598-e604. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005729. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Hospital variation in mortality after emergent bowel resections: The role of failure-to-rescue.急症肠切除术后死亡率的医院差异:未抢救成功的作用。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 May;84(5):702-710. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001827.
5
Complications and Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Noncardiac Surgery in the Veterans Affairs Health System.退伍军人事务部医疗体系中住院非心脏手术后的并发症和抢救失败。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1157-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2920.
6
Variation in Hospital Performance for General Surgery in Younger and Older Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study.老年和年轻成年人普通外科手术的医院绩效差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Aug 1;280(2):261-266. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006184. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
7
Association between hospital volume and failure-to-rescue for open repairs of juxtarenal aneurysms.医院容量与肾周动脉瘤开放修复术失败挽救率之间的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):851-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.047. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
8
Failure to rescue after major gynecologic surgery.重大妇科手术后未能抢救成功。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):420.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
9
Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries.全球择期手术后患者结局:27 个低收入、中收入和高收入国家的前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Oct 31;117(5):601-609. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew316.
10
Variation and Impact of Multiple Complications on Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Surgery.住院手术后多种并发症对未能挽救生命的影响及变异情况
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):59-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001917.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Ownership and Surgical Outcomes in East, Central, and Southern Africa.东非、中非和南非的医院所有权与手术结果
JAMA Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1430.
2
The side effects of the pandemic on all-cause postoperative mortality in a COVID reference Hospital in Brazil: a before and after cohort study with 15156 patients.疫情对巴西一家新冠定点医院全因术后死亡率的影响:一项针对15156名患者的前后队列研究。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar-Apr;75(2):844600. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844600. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
3
Transforming perioperative care in Brazil: challenges and opportunities for improving outcomes.
转变巴西的围手术期护理:改善治疗结果的挑战与机遇
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar-Apr;75(2):844596. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844596. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Family supplemented patient monitoring after surgery (SMARTER): a pilot stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.家庭补充术后患者监测(SMARTER):一项试点性阶梯式楔形群组随机试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Oct;133(4):846-852. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.06.027. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
5
Pancreatic surgery outcomes: multicentre prospective snapshot study in 67 countries.胰腺手术结果:67 个国家的多中心前瞻性快照研究。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad330.
6
Intensive care utilisation after elective surgery in Australia and New Zealand: A point prevalence study.澳大利亚和新西兰择期手术后重症监护的使用情况:一项时点患病率研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 14;26(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Outcomes of elective liver surgery worldwide: a global, prospective, multicenter, cross-sectional study.全球择期肝外科手术结局:一项全球性、前瞻性、多中心、横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3954-3966. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000711.
8
Troponin elevation as a marker of short deterioration and one-year death in a high-risk surgical patient cohort in a low and middle income country setting: a postoperative approach to increase surveillance.肌钙蛋白升高是中低收入国家高危手术患者队列短期恶化和一年死亡的标志物:一种增加监测的术后方法。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;70(11):1776-1788. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02558-4. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
9
Perioperative optimisation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): A systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).中低收入国家(LMICs)围手术期优化:手术后加速康复(ERAS)的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 3;13:04114. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04114.
10
Initiatives to detect and prevent death from perioperative deterioration.针对围手术期恶化导致的死亡进行检测和预防的措施。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Dec 1;36(6):676-682. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001312. Epub 2023 Sep 28.