Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen East, Denmark.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1812-1818. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex248.
Is it possible to develop a validated score that can identify women with Bowel Endometriosis Syndrome (BENS) and be used to monitor the effect of medical and surgical treatment?
The BENS score can be used to identify women with BENS and to monitor the effect of medical and surgical treatment of women suffering from bowel endometriosis.
Endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease with extensive variation in anatomical and clinical presentation, and symptoms do not always correspond to the disease burden. Current endometriosis scoring systems are mainly based on anatomical and surgical findings.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The score was developed and validated from a cohort of 525 women with medically or surgically treated bowel endometriosis from Aarhus and Copenhagen University Hospitals, Denmark.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Patients filled in questionnaires on pelvic pain, quality of life (QoL) and urinary, sexual and bowel function. Items were selected for the final score using clinical and statistical criteria. The chosen variables were included in a multivariate analysis. Individual score values were designated items to form the BENS score, which was divided into 'no BENS', 'minor BENS' and 'major BENS.' Internal and external validations were performed.
The six most important items were 'pelvic pain', 'use of analgesics', 'dyschezia', 'straining to urinate', 'fecal urgency' and 'satisfaction with sexual life'. The range of the BENS score (0-28) was divided into 0-8 (no BENS), 9-16 (minor BENS) and 17-28 (major BENS). External validation showed a significant association between BENS score and QoL (P = 0.0001).
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The BENS scoring system is limited by the fact that it was developed from a single endometriosis unit in Denmark, making it susceptible to social, cultural and demographic bias.
It is the first endometriosis classification system to be based directly on the symptomatology of the patient. Validation in other languages will promote comparison of treatments and results across borders.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was either sought or obtained for this study. A.F. is an investigator for Bayer, outside this work.
是否可以开发一种经过验证的评分系统来识别患有肠子宫内膜异位症综合征(BENS)的女性,并用于监测医学和手术治疗的效果?
BENS 评分可用于识别患有 BENS 的女性,并监测患有肠子宫内膜异位症的女性接受医学和手术治疗的效果。
子宫内膜异位症是一种异质性疾病,其解剖学和临床表现广泛变化,症状并不总是与疾病负担相对应。目前的子宫内膜异位症评分系统主要基于解剖学和手术发现。
研究设计、规模和持续时间:该评分系统由来自丹麦奥胡斯和哥本哈根大学医院的 525 名接受过肠子宫内膜异位症医学或手术治疗的女性组成的队列开发和验证。
参与者/材料、设置和方法:患者填写了关于盆腔疼痛、生活质量(QoL)以及尿、性和肠功能的问卷。使用临床和统计标准选择最终评分的项目。选择的变量被纳入多变量分析。个体得分值被指定为形成 BENS 评分的项目,BENS 评分分为“无 BENS”、“轻微 BENS”和“严重 BENS”。进行了内部和外部验证。
六个最重要的项目是“盆腔疼痛”、“使用镇痛药”、“排便困难”、“排尿困难”、“粪便急迫”和“对性生活的满意度”。BENS 评分(0-28)的范围分为 0-8(无 BENS)、9-16(轻微 BENS)和 17-28(严重 BENS)。外部验证表明 BENS 评分与 QoL 之间存在显著关联(P=0.0001)。
局限性、谨慎的原因:BENS 评分系统的局限性在于它是由丹麦的一个单一子宫内膜异位症单位开发的,因此容易受到社会、文化和人口统计学偏见的影响。
它是第一个直接基于患者症状的子宫内膜异位症分类系统。在其他语言中的验证将促进跨境治疗和结果的比较。
研究资金/竞争利益:这项研究没有寻求或获得外部资金。A.F. 是拜耳的研究员,与这项工作无关。