• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Screening for Autism with the SRS and SCQ: Variations across Demographic, Developmental and Behavioral Factors in Preschool Children.使用 SRS 和 SCQ 进行自闭症筛查:学龄前儿童在人口统计学、发育和行为因素方面的差异。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Nov;47(11):3550-3561. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3255-5.
2
Influence of family demographic factors on social communication questionnaire scores.家庭人口统计学因素对社会沟通问卷评分的影响。
Autism Res. 2018 May;11(5):695-706. doi: 10.1002/aur.1935. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
3
Validity of the social communication questionnaire in assessing risk of autism in preschool children with developmental problems.社交沟通问卷在评估有发育问题的学龄前儿童自闭症风险中的效度。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Aug;37(7):1272-8. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0279-7. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
4
Efficacy of three screening instruments in the identification of autistic-spectrum disorders.三种筛查工具在孤独症谱系障碍识别中的效能
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;191:554-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040196.
5
Why are only some children with autism spectrum disorder misclassified by the social communication questionnaire? An empirical investigation of individual differences in sensitivity and specificity in a clinic-referred sample.为什么只有部分自闭症谱系障碍儿童会被社交沟通问卷误诊?对临床就诊样本中敏感性和特异性个体差异的实证研究。
J Neurodev Disord. 2023 Aug 22;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s11689-023-09497-7.
6
Utility of the social communication questionnaire-current and social responsiveness scale as teacher-report screening tools for autism spectrum disorders.社会沟通问卷-当前和社会反应量表作为教师报告自闭症谱系障碍筛查工具的效用。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2012 Aug;42(8):1705-16. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1412-9.
7
Autism spectrum disorders in children with functional defecation disorders.儿童功能性排便障碍与自闭症谱系障碍。
J Pediatr. 2013 Sep;163(3):873-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.02.028. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
8
Screening for autism spectrum disorders with the social communication questionnaire.使用社交沟通问卷筛查自闭症谱系障碍。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006 Apr;27(2 Suppl):S95-S103. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200604002-00007.
9
Screening for autism: agreement with diagnosis.自闭症筛查:与诊断结果的一致性。
Autism. 2006 May;10(3):229-42. doi: 10.1177/1362361306063288.
10
Child and family characteristics moderate agreement between caregiver and clinician report of autism symptoms.儿童和家庭特征会影响照料者和临床医生报告自闭症症状的一致性。
Autism Res. 2018 Mar;11(3):476-487. doi: 10.1002/aur.1907. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
An epigenome-wide association study in the case-control study to explore early development identifies differential DNA methylation near ZFP57 as associated with autistic traits.一项在病例对照研究中进行的全表观基因组关联研究,旨在探索早期发育情况,结果发现ZFP57附近的DNA甲基化差异与自闭症特征相关。
J Neurodev Disord. 2025 Aug 16;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s11689-025-09637-1.
2
Associations Between the SRS-2 and the ASEBA Adult Self Report: Implications for Interpretation of the SRS-2 in Autistic Adults.社会反应量表第二版(SRS - 2)与儿童行为评估系统成人自评版(ASEBA)之间的关联:对自闭症成年人中SRS - 2解释的启示
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06988-5.
3
Item Analysis of an Early Social Responsiveness Scale for Assessing Autism Risk.用于评估自闭症风险的早期社会反应量表的项目分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):615. doi: 10.3390/bs15050615.
4
DSM-5 based algorithms for the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised for children ages 4-17 years.基于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的4至17岁儿童自闭症诊断访谈修订版算法。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Sep;66(9):1403-1413. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14159. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
5
Oculomotor Function in Children and Adolescents with Autism, ADHD or Co-occurring Autism and ADHD.患有自闭症、注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)或同时患有自闭症和ADHD的儿童及青少年的动眼功能
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06718-3.
6
Structural, Institutional, and Interpersonal Racism: Calling for Equity in Autism Research and Practice.结构性、制度性和人际性种族主义:呼吁自闭症研究与实践中的公平性。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02280-x.
7
Demographic Correlates of Autism: How Do Associations Compare Between Diagnosis and a Quantitative Trait Measure?自闭症的人口统计学关联:诊断与定量性状测量之间的关联如何比较?
Autism Res. 2025 Mar;18(3):648-659. doi: 10.1002/aur.3296. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
8
Delayed Milestones and Demographic Factors Relate to the Accuracy of Autism Screening in Females Using Spoken Language.发育里程碑延迟和人口统计学因素与使用口语对女性进行自闭症筛查的准确性相关。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Oct 8. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06579-w.
9
Healthy Prenatal Dietary Pattern and Offspring Autism.健康的产前饮食模式与后代自闭症。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2422815. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22815.
10
Brief Report: Relationships Between Caregiver-Reported Externalizing and Internalizing Behaviors and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers.简短报告:照顾者报告的外化和内化行为与幼儿自闭症修正检查表之间的关系
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06453-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Brief Report: The ADOS Calibrated Severity Score Best Measures Autism Diagnostic Symptom Severity in Pre-School Children.简要报告:ADOS 校准严重程度评分最能衡量学前儿童自闭症诊断症状的严重程度。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Jul;49(7):2999-3006. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3072-x.
2
Demographic profile of families and children in the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED): Case-control study of autism spectrum disorder.探索早期发育研究(SEED)中家庭与儿童的人口统计学特征:自闭症谱系障碍的病例对照研究
Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul;9(3):544-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
3
A primer on confidence intervals in psychopharmacology.精神药理学置信区间简介。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;76(2):e228-31. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14f09751.
4
Using standardized diagnostic instruments to classify children with autism in the study to explore early development.在该研究中使用标准化诊断工具对自闭症儿童进行分类,以探索早期发育情况。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 May;45(5):1271-80. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2287-3.
5
The new statistics: why and how.新的统计数据:原因和方法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Confirmatory factor analytic structure and measurement invariance of quantitative autistic traits measured by the social responsiveness scale-2.采用社会反应量表-2 测量的定量自闭症特征的验证性因素分析结构和测量不变性。
Autism. 2014 Jan;18(1):31-44. doi: 10.1177/1362361313500382. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
7
Validity of the social responsiveness scale to differentiate between autism spectrum disorders and disruptive behaviour disorders.社会反应性量表区分自闭症谱系障碍和破坏性行为障碍的有效性。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;23(2):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0427-5. Epub 2013 May 30.
8
The modified checklist for autism in toddlers: reliability in a diverse rural American sample.改良版婴幼儿孤独症检查表:在多样化的美国农村样本中的可靠性。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Oct;43(10):2269-79. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1779-x.
9
Factors influencing scores on the social responsiveness scale.影响社会反应量表得分的因素。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;54(2):216-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02589.x. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
10
Cost comparison of early intensive behavioral intervention and treatment as usual for children with autism spectrum disorder in The Netherlands.荷兰自闭症谱系障碍儿童早期强化行为干预与常规治疗的成本比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):1763-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

使用 SRS 和 SCQ 进行自闭症筛查:学龄前儿童在人口统计学、发育和行为因素方面的差异。

Screening for Autism with the SRS and SCQ: Variations across Demographic, Developmental and Behavioral Factors in Preschool Children.

机构信息

Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mailstop C234, 13121 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Nov;47(11):3550-3561. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3255-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10803-017-3255-5
PMID:28856480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5743015/
Abstract

The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Social Responsiveness Scales (SRS) are commonly used screeners for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Data from the Study to Explore Early Development were used to examine variations in the performance of these instruments by child characteristics and family demographics. For both instruments, specificity decreased as maternal education and family income decreased. Specificity was decreased with lower developmental functioning and higher behavior problems. This suggests that the false positive rates of the SRS and the SCQ are associated with child characteristics and family demographic factors. There is a need for ASD screeners that perform well across socioeconomic and child characteristics. Clinicians should be mindful of differential performance of these instruments in various groups of children.

摘要

社会沟通问卷 (SCQ) 和社会反应量表 (SRS) 是常用于自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 的筛查工具。本研究使用来自早期发展研究的数据,考察了儿童特征和家庭人口统计学因素对这些工具表现的影响。对于这两种工具,特异性随着母亲教育和家庭收入的降低而降低。特异性随发育功能降低和行为问题增加而降低。这表明 SRS 和 SCQ 的假阳性率与儿童特征和家庭人口统计学因素有关。需要一种在社会经济和儿童特征方面表现良好的 ASD 筛查工具。临床医生应该注意这些工具在不同儿童群体中的不同表现。