Eaves Linda C, Wingert Heather D, Ho Helena H, Mickelson Elizabeth C R
Department of Psychology, Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2006 Apr;27(2 Suppl):S95-S103. doi: 10.1097/00004703-200604002-00007.
The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) is a parent report screening measure for autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) based on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). To examine its validity in a young sample, the SCQ was given to parents of 151 children at a mean age of 5 years, before assessment in tertiary autism or preschool clinics. Overall sensitivity was .71, the same for both clinics, but specificity was better for the preschool clinic (.62) than for the autism clinic (.53) reflecting fewer false-positives in the former. The "hit rate" was 65% with 28% of the children with autism missed by the SCQ at a cutoff score of 15 (false-negatives) and 38% of the nonautistic misidentified as having an ASD (false-positives). Item validity analysis, contrary to what was previously published, indicated that only 15 or 46% of the items distinguished between children with and without ASD in this much younger sample. False-negatives were somewhat higher functioning. The SCQ would seem to be a useful tool for identifying young children in need of further assessment and assisting in routing them to the appropriate clinic, especially if used in conjunction with a screening by a community professional. There remain questions about the "best" cutoff score to use and whether a shorter version, based on the items that distinguished autistic from nonautistic, would be more reliable and valid with younger children. Furthermore, it may be that an adjusted score is required when parents omit items or with nonverbal children who cannot be scored on some of the items.
社交沟通问卷(SCQ)是一种基于修订版自闭症诊断访谈(ADI-R)的由家长报告的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)筛查工具。为了检验其在年轻样本中的有效性,在三级自闭症诊所或学前诊所对151名平均年龄为5岁的儿童进行评估之前,让家长填写了SCQ。总体敏感性为0.71,两个诊所相同,但学前诊所的特异性(0.62)优于自闭症诊所(0.53),这反映出前者的假阳性较少。“命中率”为65%,在临界值为15分时,28%的自闭症儿童被SCQ漏诊(假阴性),38%的非自闭症儿童被误诊为患有ASD(假阳性)。与之前发表的结果相反,项目效度分析表明,在这个年龄小得多的样本中,只有15项(占46%)能够区分患有和未患有ASD的儿童。假阴性儿童的功能水平略高。SCQ似乎是一种有用的工具,可用于识别需要进一步评估的幼儿,并帮助将他们转诊到合适的诊所,特别是如果与社区专业人员的筛查结合使用。关于使用“最佳”临界值以及基于区分自闭症和非自闭症儿童的项目的简短版本对年幼儿童是否更可靠和有效,仍然存在问题。此外,当家长遗漏项目或对于无法对某些项目进行评分的非语言儿童,可能需要调整分数。