Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Shriram Center Room 202, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Department of Bio-Engineering, Stanford University, 443 Via Ortega, Shriram Center Room 202, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018 Feb;17(1):235-247. doi: 10.1007/s10237-017-0957-8. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Real-time quantification of head impacts using wearable sensors is an appealing approach to assess concussion risk. Traditionally, sensors were evaluated for accurately measuring peak resultant skull accelerations and velocities. With growing interest in utilizing model-estimated tissue responses for injury prediction, it is important to evaluate sensor accuracy in estimating tissue response as well. Here, we quantify how sensor kinematic measurement errors can propagate into tissue response errors. Using previous instrumented mouthguard validation datasets, we found that skull kinematic measurement errors in both magnitude and direction lead to errors in tissue response magnitude and distribution. For molar design instrumented mouthguards susceptible to mandible disturbances, 150-400% error in skull kinematic measurements resulted in 100% error in regional peak tissue response. With an improved incisor design mitigating mandible disturbances, errors in skull kinematics were reduced to <50%, and several tissue response errors were reduced to <10%. Applying 30[Formula: see text] rotations to reference kinematic signals to emulate sensor transformation errors yielded below 10% error in regional peak tissue response; however, up to 20% error was observed in peak tissue response for individual finite elements. These findings demonstrate that kinematic resultant errors result in regional peak tissue response errors, while kinematic directionality errors result in tissue response distribution errors. This highlights the need to account for both kinematic magnitude and direction errors and accurately determine transformations between sensors and the skull.
使用可穿戴传感器实时量化头部冲击是评估脑震荡风险的一种很有吸引力的方法。传统上,传感器的评估重点是准确测量峰值合成颅骨加速度和速度。随着利用模型估计的组织响应进行损伤预测的兴趣日益浓厚,评估传感器在估计组织响应方面的准确性也很重要。在这里,我们量化了传感器运动学测量误差如何传播到组织响应误差中。使用以前的带仪器的防护牙套验证数据集,我们发现颅骨运动学测量误差在幅度和方向上都会导致组织响应幅度和分布的误差。对于容易受到下颌干扰的磨牙设计带仪器的防护牙套,颅骨运动学测量误差在 150-400%会导致局部峰值组织响应的 100%误差。采用改进的切牙设计减轻下颌干扰,将颅骨运动学的误差降低到<50%,并将几个组织响应误差降低到<10%。对参考运动学信号应用 30[Formula: see text]旋转来模拟传感器转换误差,会导致局部峰值组织响应的误差小于 10%;然而,在个别有限元中,峰值组织响应的误差高达 20%。这些发现表明,运动学合成误差会导致局部峰值组织响应误差,而运动学方向性误差会导致组织响应分布误差。这突出表明需要考虑运动学幅度和方向误差,并准确确定传感器和颅骨之间的转换。