• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝脏移植中的组织边做边学

Organizational learning-by-doing in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Stith Sarah S

机构信息

Department of Economics, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Mar;18(1):25-45. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9222-z. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-017-9222-z
PMID:28856489
Abstract

Organizational learning-by-doing implies that production outcomes improve with experience. Prior empirical research documents the existence of organizational learning-by-doing, but provides little insight into why some firms learn while others do not. Among the 124 U.S. liver transplant centers that opened between 1987 and 2009, this paper shows evidence of organizational learning-by-doing, but only shortly after entry. Significant heterogeneity exists with learning only evident among those firms entering early in the sample period when liver transplantation was an experimental medical procedure. Firms that learn begin with lower quality outcomes before improving to the level of firms that do not learn, suggesting that early patient outcomes depend on the ability of new entrants to import best practices from existing liver transplant programs. Knowledge of best practices became increasingly available over time through the dissemination of academic research and increasingly specialized training programs, so that between 1987 and 2009, 6 month post-transplant survival rates increased from 64 to 90% and evidence of organization-level learning-by-doing disappeared. The lack of any recent evidence of organizational learning-by-doing implies that common insurer experience requirements may be reducing access to health care in non-experimental complex medical procedures without an improvement in quality.

摘要

组织边干边学意味着生产成果会随着经验的积累而提高。先前的实证研究证实了组织边干边学的存在,但对于为何一些公司能够学习而另一些公司却不能,却几乎没有提供深入见解。在1987年至2009年间开业的124家美国肝脏移植中心中,本文显示了组织边干边学的证据,但仅在进入市场后不久。存在显著的异质性,只有在样本期早期进入的公司(当时肝脏移植是一种实验性医疗程序)中才明显存在学习现象。开始学习的公司在改善到未学习公司的水平之前,其初始质量结果较低,这表明早期患者的治疗结果取决于新进入者从现有肝脏移植项目中引入最佳实践的能力。随着时间的推移,通过学术研究的传播和日益专业化的培训项目,最佳实践的知识越来越容易获得,因此在1987年至2009年间,移植后6个月的生存率从64%提高到了90%,组织层面边干边学的证据也消失了。最近缺乏任何组织边干边学的证据意味着,普通保险公司的经验要求可能正在减少在非实验性复杂医疗程序中获得医疗服务的机会,而质量却没有提高。

相似文献

1
Organizational learning-by-doing in liver transplantation.肝脏移植中的组织边做边学
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2018 Mar;18(1):25-45. doi: 10.1007/s10754-017-9222-z. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
What results when firms implement practices: the differential relationship between specific practices, firm financial performance, customer service, and quality.当企业实施相关做法时会产生什么结果:特定做法、企业财务绩效、客户服务和质量之间的差异关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1467-80. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1467.
3
Unveiling the Nexus: Influence of learning motivation on organizational performance and innovative climate of Chinese firms.揭示关联:学习动机对中国企业组织绩效和创新氛围的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0304729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304729. eCollection 2024.
4
The revitalization of U.S. dental education.美国牙科教育的振兴。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Feb;72(2 Suppl):28-42.
5
Controlled-surgical education in clinical liver transplantation is not associated with increased patient risks.临床肝移植中的可控外科教育与患者风险增加无关。
Clin Transplant. 2006;20 Suppl 17:69-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00603.x.
6
Microsurgical training curriculum for learning kidney and liver transplantation in the rat.
Microsurgery. 2005;25(8):614-23. doi: 10.1002/micr.20174.
7
Performance in quasi-firms: an example from the Community Clinical Oncology Program.准企业中的表现:以社区临床肿瘤项目为例。
J Health Hum Resour Adm. 1992 Winter;14(3):307-26.
8
Integrating research, clinical care, and education in academic health science centers.在学术健康科学中心整合研究、临床护理和教育。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016 Oct 10;30(7):1140-1160. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-11-2015-0177.
9
Organizational learning and continuous quality improvement: examining the impact on nursing home performance.组织学习与持续质量改进:审视对疗养院绩效的影响。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2002 Summer;15(2):17-23. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60576-5.
10
[Anaesthetists learn--do institutions also learn? Importance of institutional learning and corporate culture in clinics].[麻醉医生学习——医疗机构也学习吗?临床机构学习和企业文化的重要性]
Anaesthesist. 2007 Oct;56(10):983-91. doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1265-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Deliberate learning in health care: the effect of importing best practices and creative problem solving on hospital performance improvement.医疗保健中的刻意学习:引入最佳实践和创造性问题解决对医院绩效提升的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):450-71. doi: 10.1177/1077558714536619. Epub 2014 May 29.
2
Does doctors' experience matter in LASIK surgeries?医生的经验在 LASIK 手术中重要吗?
Health Econ. 2011 Jun;20(6):699-722. doi: 10.1002/hec.1626.
3
Learning by doing, scale effects, or neither? Cardiac surgeons after residency.
边做边学、规模效应,还是两者皆无?住院医师后的心脏外科医生。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):1960-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01018.x. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
4
Retention, learning by doing, and performance in emergency medical services.紧急医疗服务中的留用、实践学习与绩效
Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):902-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00953.x. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
5
ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.肝移植候选者中与ABO血型相关的等待名单差异:终末期肝病模型(MELD)采用的影响
Transplantation. 2008 Mar 27;85(6):844-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318166cc38.
6
Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997-2006.1997 - 2006年美国的肝脏和肠道移植
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):958-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02174.x.
7
Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ transplants. Final rule.医疗保险计划;医院参与条件:器官移植中心进行器官移植的批准和重新批准要求。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2007 Mar 30;72(61):15197-280.
8
Association of center volume with outcome after liver and kidney transplantation.肝肾移植后中心容积与预后的关联
Am J Transplant. 2004 Jun;4(6):920-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00462.x.
9
Learning and the evolution of medical technologies: the diffusion of coronary angioplasty.医学技术的学习与演进:冠状动脉血管成形术的传播
J Health Econ. 2002 Sep;21(5):873-85. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00057-7.
10
Liver transplant waiting time does not correlate with waiting list mortality: implications for liver allocation policy.肝移植等待时间与等待名单上的死亡率无关:对肝脏分配政策的启示。
Liver Transpl. 2000 Sep;6(5):543-52. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2000.9744.