• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011年维多利亚州围产期数据收集中产后出血数据的准确性:一项验证研究的结果

Accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the 2011 Victorian Perinatal Data Collection: Results of a validation study.

作者信息

Flood Margaret, Pollock Wendy, McDonald Susan J, Davey Mary-Ann

机构信息

Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Maternal Critical Care, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;58(2):210-216. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12692. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.12692
PMID:28857124
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) rate in Victoria in 2009 for women having their first birth, based on information reported to the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection (VPDC), was 23.6% (primiparas). Prior to 2009 PPH was collected via a tick box item on the perinatal form. Estimated blood loss (EBL) volume is now collected and it is from this item the PPH rate is calculated. Periodic assessment of data accuracy is essential to inform clinicians and others who rely on these data of their quality and limitations.

AIMS

This paper describes the results of a state-wide validation study of the accuracy of EBL volume and EBL-related data items reported to VPDC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PPH data from a random sample of 1% of births in Victoria in 2011 were extracted from source medical records and compared with information submitted to the VPDC. Accuracy was determined, together with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for dichotomous items.

RESULTS

Accuracy of reporting for EBL ≥ 500 mL was 97.2% and for EBL ≥ 1500 mL was 99.7%. Sensitivity for EBL ≥ 500 mL was 89.0% (CI 83.1-93.0) and for EBL ≥ 1500 mL was 71.4% (CI 35.9-91.8). Blood product transfusion, peripartum hysterectomy and procedures to control bleeding were all accurately reported in >99% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Most PPH-related data items in the 2011 VPDC may be considered reliable. Our results suggest EBL ≥ 1500 mL is likely to be under-reported. Changes to policies and practices of recording blood loss could further increase accuracy of reporting.

摘要

背景

根据向维多利亚围产期数据收集系统(VPDC)报告的信息,2009年维多利亚州初产妇的产后出血(PPH)率为23.6%(初产妇)。2009年之前,PPH是通过围产期表格上的一个勾选框项目收集的。现在收集估计失血量(EBL),PPH率就是根据这个项目计算出来的。定期评估数据准确性对于告知临床医生和其他依赖这些数据的人其质量和局限性至关重要。

目的

本文描述了一项全州范围内对报告给VPDC的EBL量和与EBL相关的数据项目准确性的验证研究结果。

材料与方法

从2011年维多利亚州1%的随机抽样出生记录的原始医疗记录中提取PPH数据,并与提交给VPDC的信息进行比较。确定二分项目的准确性以及敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

EBL≥500mL报告的准确性为97.2%,EBL≥1500mL报告的准确性为99.7%。EBL≥500mL的敏感性为89.0%(可信区间83.1 - 93.0),EBL≥1500mL的敏感性为71.4%(可信区间35.9 - 91.8)。血液制品输注、围产期子宫切除术和控制出血的操作在超过99%的病例中都得到了准确报告。

结论

2011年VPDC中大多数与PPH相关的数据项目可能被认为是可靠的。我们的结果表明EBL≥1500mL可能报告不足。改变记录失血量的政策和做法可能会进一步提高报告的准确性。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the 2011 Victorian Perinatal Data Collection: Results of a validation study.2011年维多利亚州围产期数据收集中产后出血数据的准确性:一项验证研究的结果
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;58(2):210-216. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12692. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Data accuracy in the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection: Results of a validation study of 2011 data.维多利亚围产期数据收集的数据准确性:2011 年数据验证研究的结果。
Health Inf Manag. 2017 Sep;46(3):113-126. doi: 10.1177/1833358316689688. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
3
Validation of the accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the ObstetriX database: A retrospective cohort study.验证 ObstetriX 数据库中产后出血数据的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Methodological processes in validating and analysing the quality of population-based data: a case study using the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection.验证和分析基于人群数据质量的方法学过程:以维多利亚围产期数据收集为例的案例研究。
Health Inf Manag. 2013;42(3):12-9. doi: 10.1177/183335831304200301.
5
Incidence, trends and severity of primary postpartum haemorrhage in Australia: A population-based study using Victorian Perinatal Data Collection data for 764 244 births.澳大利亚原发性产后出血的发病率、趋势及严重程度:一项基于人群的研究,使用维多利亚州围产期数据收集项目中764244例分娩的数据。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):228-234. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12826. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register.产后出血编码在瑞典妊娠登记处的准确性。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Feb;100(2):322-330. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13994. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
7
Trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage, 2003-2011.2003 - 2011年产后出血的趋势与结局
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 15;15:334. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0788-5.
8
Accuracy of international classification of diseases, ninth revision, codes for postpartum hemorrhage among women undergoing cesarean delivery.国际疾病分类第九版中剖宫产妇女产后出血编码的准确性。
Transfusion. 2018 Apr;58(4):998-1005. doi: 10.1111/trf.14498. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
9
Monitoring postpartum haemorrhage in Australia: Opportunities to improve reporting.澳大利亚产后出血监测:改进报告的机会。
Women Birth. 2018 Apr;31(2):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
10
[Postpartum haemorrhage in Umbria: accuracy of the regional health information system for the code ICD-9-CM 666.x.].[翁布里亚地区的产后出血:国际疾病分类第九版临床修正本(ICD-9-CM)编码666.x的区域卫生信息系统的准确性]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Sep;110(9):420-425. doi: 10.1701/3215.31935.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of major labour-related complications for pregnancies progressing to 42 weeks or beyond.妊娠 42 周及以上孕妇发生主要分娩相关并发症的风险。
BMC Med. 2021 May 25;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01988-5.
2
Validation of anaemia, haemorrhage and blood disorder reporting in hospital data in New South Wales, Australia.验证澳大利亚新南威尔士州医院数据中贫血、出血和血液疾病报告的准确性。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 May 4;14(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05584-x.
3
Validation study: evaluation of the metrological quality of French hospital data for perinatal algorithms.
验证研究:评估法国医院围产算法数据的计量质量。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 12;10(5):e035218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035218.