• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证 ObstetriX 数据库中产后出血数据的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。

Validation of the accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the ObstetriX database: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

The Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.020
PMID:30409345
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data related to postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) are important clinical parameters which can be applied to all places of birth, and their recording can be missed by busy clinicians providing critical care to women. We compared the accuracy of electronic ObstetriX records to the paper-based medical records of the women who sustained PPH.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study over a period of one month, 363 electronic records were compared to the paper-based medical records. The volume of blood loss for each patient and interventions for PPH were compared across birth unit, operating theatre and postpartum ward. The kappa statistic for agreement between the two types of recording methods was calculated.

RESULTS

There was substantial agreement between the ObstetriX records and medical records for the volume of blood loss at birth (kappa = 0.74), but poor agreement between records for the cumulative total volume of blood loss (kappa = 0.18). More women who experienced PPH and delivered in the operating theatre had errors in their ObstetriX records compared to women who had PPH with births in the birth unit (50% vs 16%; n = 73, P = 0.005). Interventions for PPH were found to be poorly recorded in ObstetriX, with 84% (n = 64/76) of women who experienced PPH having none of the interventions they received recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The ObstetriX database was not a generally reliable source of data relating to PPH. However, some data were recorded reliably, in particular, the volume of blood loss at birth.

摘要

背景

产后出血(PPH)相关数据是重要的临床参数,可应用于所有分娩场所,但其记录可能会被忙于为妇女提供重症监护的忙碌临床医生遗漏。我们比较了电子 ObstetriX 记录与发生 PPH 的妇女的纸质病历的准确性。

方法

在为期一个月的回顾性队列研究中,将 363 份电子记录与纸质病历进行了比较。比较了各产妇在分娩单元、手术室和产后病房的失血量和 PPH 干预措施。计算了两种记录方法之间的一致性kappa 统计量。

结果

ObstetriX 记录与病历在分娩时的失血量方面具有高度一致性(kappa=0.74),但累计失血量记录之间的一致性较差(kappa=0.18)。与分娩单元分娩的发生 PPH 的女性相比,在手术室分娩并发生 PPH 的女性的 ObstetriX 记录中存在更多错误(50%对 16%;n=73,P=0.005)。ObstetriX 中发现 PPH 干预措施记录不佳,经历 PPH 的 84%(n=64/76)的女性没有记录她们接受的任何干预措施。

结论

ObstetriX 数据库并不是与 PPH 相关数据的可靠来源。然而,一些数据记录可靠,特别是分娩时的失血量。

相似文献

1
Validation of the accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the ObstetriX database: A retrospective cohort study.验证 ObstetriX 数据库中产后出血数据的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec;120:42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
2
Does skin-to-skin contact and breast feeding at birth affect the rate of primary postpartum haemorrhage: Results of a cohort study.出生时的皮肤接触和母乳喂养会影响产后原发性出血的发生率吗:一项队列研究的结果。
Midwifery. 2015 Nov;31(11):1110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
3
Accuracy of postpartum haemorrhage data in the 2011 Victorian Perinatal Data Collection: Results of a validation study.2011年维多利亚州围产期数据收集中产后出血数据的准确性:一项验证研究的结果
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;58(2):210-216. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12692. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Trends and outcomes of postpartum haemorrhage, 2003-2011.2003 - 2011年产后出血的趋势与结局
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 15;15:334. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0788-5.
5
Postpartum obstetric red cell transfusion practice: A retrospective study in a tertiary obstetric centre.产后产科红细胞输血实践:在一家三级产科中心的回顾性研究。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;58(2):170-177. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12680. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
6
Improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage-An observational study of practical obstetric team training.改善产后出血妇女的临床管理但不能改善患者结局——实用产科团队培训的观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0203806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203806. eCollection 2018.
7
Identifying the risk: a prospective cohort study examining postpartum haemorrhage in a regional Australian health service.识别风险:一项在澳大利亚某地区卫生服务机构中开展的前瞻性队列研究,旨在调查产后出血。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1852-8.
8
Increasing trends in atonic postpartum haemorrhage in Ireland: an 11-year population-based cohort study.爱尔兰产后无张力性出血呈上升趋势:一项为期 11 年的基于人群的队列研究。
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):306-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03198.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
9
Bimanual examination for clot evacuation: a retrospective cohort study of women with postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery.手法剥离宫腔积血的临床效果:一项阴道分娩产后出血患者的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02916-w.
10
Accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage coding in the Swedish Pregnancy Register.产后出血编码在瑞典妊娠登记处的准确性。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Feb;100(2):322-330. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13994. Epub 2020 Oct 4.