Andrews Christine J, Kimble Roy M, Kempf Margit, Cuttle Leila
Faculty of Medicine, Child Health Research Centre, Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Children's Health Queensland, Pegg Leditschke Paediatric Burns Centre, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Sep;25(5):792-804. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12577. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
Deep dermal burn injuries require extensive medical care; however, the water temperatures and durations of exposure that result in a severe scald injury are unknown. This study used a porcine burn model to investigate the time and temperature threshold for clinically relevant deep dermal injuries for both immersion (long duration) and spill/splash (short duration) scald events. Scald wounds were created on the flanks of anaesthetized juvenile large White pigs (27 kg). Acute tissue injury evaluations performed at 1 hour and days 1, 3, and 7 postburn (16 pigs) included: wound examination, biopsies, and laser Doppler imaging. Up to 20 burn combinations were tested including: 50-60 °C water for 1-10 minutes (immersion); and 60-90 °C water for 5 seconds (spill/splash). Burn conditions demonstrating mid-to-deep dermal damage histologically were followed for 21 days to assess time to reepithelialize (eight pigs). Histologically, depth of damage increased until day 3 postburn. Damage to ≥75% of the depth of dermis was associated with burns taking longer than 3 weeks to fully reepithelialize. For spill/splash (5 seconds) scalds, water at ≥75 °C showed damage to mid-dermis or deeper by day 3; however, only burns from water ≥85 °C were not reepithelialized by day 21. For immersion scalds of equivalent duration, water at 55 °C caused significantly deeper dermal damage than 50 °C (p < 0.05) at day 3. Immersion scalds that were not fully reepithelialized by day 21 included 50 °C for >10 minutes, 55 °C for 5 minutes, 60 °C for 60 seconds, and 70 °C for > 15 seconds. This research provides valuable evidence-based injury prediction data, which can be used to inform future burn injury prevention guidelines/legislation to reduce the risk of severe scald injuries and support medicolegal opinions for cases where an inflicted mechanism of injury is alleged.
深度真皮烧伤需要广泛的医疗护理;然而,导致严重烫伤的水温及暴露持续时间尚不清楚。本研究使用猪烧伤模型,调查浸没(长时间)和泼溅/飞溅(短时间)烫伤事件导致临床相关深度真皮损伤的时间和温度阈值。在麻醉的幼年大白猪(27千克)侧腹制造烫伤创面。在烧伤后1小时、1天、3天和7天对16头猪进行急性组织损伤评估,包括:伤口检查、活检和激光多普勒成像。测试了多达20种烧伤组合,包括:50 - 60°C水暴露1 - 10分钟(浸没);以及60 - 90°C水暴露5秒(泼溅/飞溅)。对组织学显示中到深度真皮损伤的烧伤情况进行21天跟踪,以评估重新上皮化的时间(8头猪)。组织学上,损伤深度在烧伤后第3天前不断增加。真皮深度损伤≥75%与烧伤完全重新上皮化需要超过3周时间相关。对于泼溅/飞溅(5秒)烫伤,75°C及以上的水在第3天显示中真皮或更深层损伤;然而,只有85°C及以上水温造成的烧伤在第21天未重新上皮化。对于同等持续时间的浸没烫伤,55°C的水在第3天造成的真皮损伤明显比50°C更深(p < 0.05)。在第21天未完全重新上皮化的浸没烫伤包括:50°C超过10分钟、55°C 5分钟、60°C 60秒以及