Ochoo Benjamin, Valcour James, Sarkar Atanu
Communicable Disease Control (CDC), Public Health, Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living, Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3B 3M9.
Division of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada A1B 3V6.
Environ Res. 2017 Nov;159:435-443. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Studying public perception on drinking water quality is crucial for managing of water resources, generation of water quality standards, and surveillance of the drinking-water quality. However, in policy discourse, the reliability of public perception concerning drinking water quality and associated health risks is questionable. Does the public perception of water quality equate with the actual water quality? We investigated public perceptions of water quality and the perceived health risks and associated with the actual quality of public water supplies in the same communities. The study was conducted in 45 communities of Newfoundland (Canada) in 2012. First, a telephone survey of 100 households was conducted to examine public perceptions of drinking water quality of their respective public sources. Then we extracted public water quality reports of the same communities (1988-2011) from the provincial government's water resources portal. These reports contained the analysis of 2091 water samples, including levels of Disinfection By-Products (DBPs), nutrients, metals, ions and physical parameters. The reports showed that colour, manganese, total dissolved solids, iron, turbidity, and DBPs were the major detected parameters in the public water. However, the majority of the respondents (>56%) were either completely satisfied or very satisfied with the quality of drinking water. Older, higher educated and high-income group respondents were more satisfied with water quality than the younger, less educated and low-income group respondents. The study showed that there was no association with public satisfaction level and actual water quality of the respective communities. Even, in the communities, supplied by the same water system, the respondents had differences in opinion. Despite the effort by the provincial government to make the water-test results available on its website for years, the study showed existing disconnectedness between public perception of drinking water quality and actual quality. We had little scope to explore the possible explanations, and hence further studies are required to verify the age, gender educational status and income differential about the satisfaction of public service like water supply.
研究公众对饮用水质量的看法对于水资源管理、水质标准的制定以及饮用水质量监测至关重要。然而,在政策讨论中,公众对饮用水质量及相关健康风险看法的可靠性值得怀疑。公众对水质的看法是否等同于实际水质?我们调查了同一社区公众对水质的看法、感知到的健康风险以及与公共供水实际质量的关联。该研究于2012年在加拿大纽芬兰的45个社区开展。首先,对100户家庭进行了电话调查,以了解公众对各自公共水源饮用水质量的看法。然后,我们从省政府的水资源门户网站提取了同一社区(1988 - 2011年)的公共水质报告。这些报告包含了对2091个水样的分析,包括消毒副产物(DBPs)、营养物质、金属、离子和物理参数的水平。报告显示,颜色、锰、总溶解固体、铁、浊度和消毒副产物是公共供水中主要检测到的参数。然而,大多数受访者(>56%)对饮用水质量完全满意或非常满意。年龄较大、受教育程度较高和高收入群体的受访者对水质的满意度高于年龄较小、受教育程度较低和低收入群体的受访者。研究表明,公众满意度与各社区的实际水质之间没有关联。甚至,在由同一供水系统供水的社区中,受访者的意见也存在差异。尽管省政府多年来努力在其网站上公布水质检测结果,但研究表明公众对饮用水质量的看法与实际质量之间存在脱节。我们几乎没有机会探讨可能的解释,因此需要进一步研究来验证关于供水等公共服务满意度方面的年龄、性别、教育状况和收入差异。