• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偷猎和栖息地结构对反捕食者行为策略的影响:以高寒沙漠中的原驼种群为例的研究。

The effects of poaching and habitat structure on anti-predator behavioral strategies: A guanaco population in a high cold desert as case study.

作者信息

Cappa Flavio, Campos Valeria, Giannoni Stella, Andino Natalia

机构信息

INTERBIODES (Interacciones Biológicas del Desierto), Facultad Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales (Universidad Nacional de San Juan), San Juan, Argentina.

CIGEOBIO-CONICET (Centro de Investigaciones de la Geósfera y Biósfera - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), San Juan, Argentina.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 31;12(8):e0184018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184018. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0184018
PMID:28859147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5578636/
Abstract

The effects of poaching on wildlife have been widely studied in conservation biology and can be heterogeneous, particularly on ungulates. These effects can be estimated through different methodologies whose use depends on several conditions such as Flight-initiation distance (FID). Our objectives were: 1- to evaluate whether poaching affects the FID and group structure of a guanaco (Lama guanicoe) population in a high cold desert in San Juan (Argentina); 2- to assess whether habitat structure (slope and vegetation cover) influences FID and group structure in this population. The study area included a site with poaching (unprotected area), and a site without poaching (protected area). We recorded 100 groups of guanacos: 70 in the protected and 30 in the unprotected area. FID and group size were greater in the unprotected than in the protected area, whereas proportions of group categories (with offspring, without offspring and solitary) were similar between areas. Besides, in relation to habitat structure, FID increased when vegetation cover decreased. On the other hand, FID and group size were not affected by slope. Our study shows that guanacos respond to poaching pressure as do other ungulate species, and that other factors such as vegetation cover also affect this behavior. Managers should be aware when interpreting FID due to its relation to habitat structure; the guanaco appears to assume greater risk (lower FID) in areas with high vegetation cover.

摘要

偷猎对野生动物的影响在保护生物学领域已得到广泛研究,且可能具有异质性,尤其是对有蹄类动物而言。这些影响可通过不同方法进行估算,方法的使用取决于诸如逃跑起始距离(FID)等多种条件。我们的目标是:1. 评估偷猎是否会影响阿根廷圣胡安高寒沙漠中骆马(原驼)种群的逃跑起始距离和群体结构;2. 评估栖息地结构(坡度和植被覆盖度)是否会影响该种群的逃跑起始距离和群体结构。研究区域包括一个存在偷猎行为的地点(未保护区)和一个不存在偷猎行为的地点(保护区)。我们记录了100组骆马:70组在保护区,30组在未保护区。未保护区的逃跑起始距离和群体规模大于保护区,而不同区域之间各类群体(有后代、无后代和独居)的比例相似。此外,关于栖息地结构,植被覆盖度降低时,逃跑起始距离增加。另一方面,逃跑起始距离和群体规模不受坡度影响。我们的研究表明,骆马与其他有蹄类物种一样,会对偷猎压力做出反应,并且植被覆盖度等其他因素也会影响这种行为。管理者在解释逃跑起始距离时应予以注意,因为它与栖息地结构有关;骆马在植被覆盖度高的区域似乎会承担更大风险(更低的逃跑起始距离)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9aa/5578636/7f6d7e9abeea/pone.0184018.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9aa/5578636/e1e6e6e8901d/pone.0184018.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9aa/5578636/7f6d7e9abeea/pone.0184018.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9aa/5578636/e1e6e6e8901d/pone.0184018.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9aa/5578636/7f6d7e9abeea/pone.0184018.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of poaching and habitat structure on anti-predator behavioral strategies: A guanaco population in a high cold desert as case study.偷猎和栖息地结构对反捕食者行为策略的影响:以高寒沙漠中的原驼种群为例的研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 31;12(8):e0184018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184018. eCollection 2017.
2
Range management affects native ungulate populations in Península Valdés, a World Natural Heritage.围场管理影响了世界自然遗产巴尔德尔半岛的本地有蹄类动物种群。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055655. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
3
Cooperative vigilance: the guanaco's (Lama guanicoe) key antipredator mechanism.合作警戒:原驼(骆马属原驼)关键的反捕食机制。
Behav Processes. 2012 Sep;91(1):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
4
Lama guanicoe remains from the Chaco ecoregion (Córdoba, Argentina): An osteological approach to the characterization of a relict wild population.查科生态区(阿根廷科尔多瓦省)的羊驼古生物遗骸:对一个遗留野生种群进行特征描述的骨骼方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 11;13(4):e0194727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194727. eCollection 2018.
5
Spatial and seasonal dynamic of abundance and distribution of guanaco and livestock: insights from using density surface and null models.原驼和家畜数量及分布的空间与季节动态:基于密度表面和空模型的见解
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085960. eCollection 2014.
6
Reintroducing Guanaco in the Upper Belt of Central Argentina: Using Population Viability Analysis to Evaluate Extinction Risk and Management Priorities.在阿根廷中部上地带重新引入原驼:利用种群生存力分析评估灭绝风险和管理重点。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 14;11(10):e0164806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164806. eCollection 2016.
7
Bayesian inference on the effect of density dependence and weather on a guanaco population from Chile.关于密度依赖性和天气对智利原驼种群影响的贝叶斯推断。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 16;9(12):e115307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115307. eCollection 2014.
8
Spatial abundance models and seasonal distribution for guanaco (Lama guanicoe) in central Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.阿根廷火地岛中部的羊驼(Lama guanicoe)空间丰富度模型和季节性分布。
PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0197814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197814. eCollection 2018.
9
Ecological correlates of group-size variation in a resource-defense ungulate, the sedentary guanaco.资源防御性反刍动物——久坐不动的羊驼的群体大小变化的生态关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089060. eCollection 2014.
10
Application of DNA forensic techniques for identifying poached guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in Chilean Patagonia*.DNA法医技术在智利巴塔哥尼亚地区鉴定被盗猎原驼(骆马)中的应用*
J Forensic Sci. 2009 Sep;54(5):1073-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01087.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying the most effective behavioural assays and predator cues for quantifying anti-predator responses in mammals: a systematic review.确定用于量化哺乳动物反捕食者反应的最有效行为测定法和捕食者线索:一项系统综述
Environ Evid. 2023 Apr 1;12(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13750-023-00299-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Protected Areas and Its Effect on an Ecosystem Function: Removal of Prosopis flexuosa Seeds by Mammals in Argentinian Drylands.保护区管理及其对生态系统功能的影响:阿根廷干旱地区哺乳动物对弯曲假紫荆种子的清除
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 21;11(9):e0162551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162551. eCollection 2016.
2
Ecological correlates of group-size variation in a resource-defense ungulate, the sedentary guanaco.资源防御性反刍动物——久坐不动的羊驼的群体大小变化的生态关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089060. eCollection 2014.
3
Cooperative vigilance: the guanaco's (Lama guanicoe) key antipredator mechanism.
合作警戒:原驼(骆马属原驼)关键的反捕食机制。
Behav Processes. 2012 Sep;91(1):82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
4
Group-size-mediated habitat selection and group fusion-fission dynamics of bison under predation risk.捕食风险下野牛群体大小介导的栖息地选择与群体融合-分裂动态
Ecology. 2009 Sep;90(9):2480-90. doi: 10.1890/08-0345.1.
5
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.广义线性混合模型:生态学与进化实用指南
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008.
6
Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change.利用卫星遥感归一化植被指数评估生态系统对环境变化的响应。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011. Epub 2005 Jun 9.
7
Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment.动物的恐惧:一项荟萃分析及风险评估综述
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2627-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3251.