• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续100例机器人辅助经裂孔食管切除术的手术及生存结果

Operative and survival outcomes in a series of 100 consecutive cases of robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomies.

作者信息

Dunn D H, Johnson E M, Anderson C A, Krueger J L, DeFor T E, Morphew J A, Banerji N

机构信息

VPCI Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Program.

VPCI Research.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-7. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox045.

DOI:10.1093/dote/dox045
PMID:28859385
Abstract

Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (RATE) is a technically complex procedure with potential for improved postoperative outcomes. In this report, we describe our experience with RATE in a large case series. A retrospective review was conducted to collect clinical, outcomes, and survival data for 100 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer (n = 98) and benign (n = 2) conditions undergoing RATE between March 2007 and December 2014. Progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves with comparisons by log-rank tests. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 264 minutes and 75 mL, respectively. Median intensive care unit stay was 1 day and median length of hospital stay was 8 days. Postoperative complications commonly observed were nonmalignant pleural effusion (38%) and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (33%); 30 day mortality rate was 2%. Median number of lymph nodes removed during RATE was 17 and R0 resection was achieved in 97.8% patients. At the end of the median follow-up period of 27.7 months, median PFS was 41 months and median OS was 54 months. 1-year and 3-year PFS rates were 82% (95% CI, 75%-89%) and 53% (95% CI, 42%-62%), respectively, and OS rates were 95% (95% CI, 91%-99%) and 57% (95% CI, 46%-67%). In our experience, RATE is an effective and safe oncologic surgical procedure in a carefully selected group of patients with acceptable operative time, minimal blood loss, standard postoperative morbidity and adequate PFS and OS profiles.

摘要

机器人辅助经裂孔食管切除术(RATE)是一种技术复杂的手术,具有改善术后结局的潜力。在本报告中,我们描述了在一个大型病例系列中开展RATE的经验。进行了一项回顾性研究,以收集2007年3月至2014年12月期间连续100例接受RATE的食管癌患者(n = 98)和良性疾病患者(n = 2)的临床、结局和生存数据。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),并通过对数秩检验进行比较。中位手术时间和估计失血量分别为264分钟和75毫升。重症监护病房中位住院时间为1天,住院中位时间为8天。常见的术后并发症为非恶性胸腔积液(38%)和喉返神经损伤(33%);30天死亡率为2%。RATE期间切除淋巴结的中位数量为17个,97.8%的患者实现了R0切除。在中位随访期27.7个月结束时,中位PFS为41个月,中位OS为54个月。1年和3年PFS率分别为82%(95%CI,75%-89%)和53%(95%CI,42%-62%),OS率分别为95%(95%CI,91%-99%)和57%(95%CI,46%-67%)。根据我们的经验,RATE在精心挑选的患者群体中是一种有效且安全的肿瘤外科手术,手术时间可接受,失血量少,术后发病率标准,PFS和OS情况良好。

相似文献

1
Operative and survival outcomes in a series of 100 consecutive cases of robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomies.连续100例机器人辅助经裂孔食管切除术的手术及生存结果
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-7. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox045.
2
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
3
Outcomes of robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.新辅助放化疗后机器人辅助经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的疗效
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):89-94. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0444. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.体重指数对机器人辅助Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后手术结果的影响:对一家高容量三级医疗中心129例病例的回顾性分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12484.
5
[Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].[机器人辅助微创食管癌切除术的短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):995-998.
6
Perioperative outcomes of single-port mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.单孔纵隔镜辅助经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗胸段食管癌的围手术期结果
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox047.
7
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with extensive mediastinal lymphadenectomy: experience with 114 consecutive patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer.机器人辅助胸腔镜食管癌切除术联合广泛纵隔淋巴结清扫术:114例连续性胸段食管癌患者的经验
Dis Esophagus. 2016 May;29(4):326-32. doi: 10.1111/dote.12335. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.非开胸入路机器人根治性食管癌切除术与传统开胸手术相比的短期疗效
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jul;29(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/dote.12345. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜联合食管癌二野淋巴结清扫术的肿瘤学长期疗效
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3:S1350-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4544-x. Epub 2015 May 29.
10
[Application of artificial pneumothorax in semi-prone position to the video-assisted thoracic surgery of esophageal carcinoma].人工气胸在半卧位应用于食管癌电视胸腔镜手术
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;34(10):785-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.10.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Transhiatal robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: unclear benefits compared to traditional transhiatal esophagectomy.经口内镜下肌切开术辅助机器人微创食管切除术:与传统经口内镜下肌切开术相比,获益尚不明确。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):883-891. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01311-7. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
2
International consensus statement on robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)国际共识声明。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Dec;12(12):7387-7401. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1945.
3
Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.
微创食管切除术中转开胸手术预示着更差的短期结局:国家癌症数据库分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3470-3478. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07124-y. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
4
Comparison of Training Efficacy Between Custom-Made Skills Simulator (CMSS) and da Vinci Skills Simulators: A Randomized Control Study.定制技能模拟器(CMSS)与达芬奇技能模拟器训练效果比较:一项随机对照研究。
World J Surg. 2019 Nov;43(11):2699-2709. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05108-6.
5
Robotic oesophago-gastric cancer surgery.机器人辅助食管癌和胃癌手术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 May;100(6_sup):27-35. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.23.