Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。

Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Program, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Allina Hospitals & Clinics, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407, USA.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged as an important procedure for disease management in esophageal cancer (EC) with clear margin status, less morbidity, and shorter hospital stays compared with open procedures. The experience with transhiatal approach robotic esophagectomy (RE) for dissection of thoracic esophagus and associated morbidity is described here. Between March 2007 and November 2010, 40 patients with resectable esophageal indications underwent transhiatal RE at the institute. Clinical data for all patients were collected prospectively. Of 40 patients undergoing RE, one patient had an extensive benign stricture, one had high-grade dysplasia, and 38 had EC. Five patients were converted from robotic to open. Median operative time and estimated blood loss were 311 minutes and 97.2 mL, respectively. Median intensive care unit stay was 1 day (range, 0-16), and median length of hospital stay was 9 days (range, 6-36). Postoperative complications frequently observed were anastomotic stricture (n= 27), recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis (n= 14), anastomotic leak (n= 10), pneumonia (n= 8), and pleural effusion (n= 18). Incidence rates of laryngeal nerve paresis (35%) and leak rate (25%) were somewhat higher in comparison with that reported in literature. However, all vocal cord injuries were temporary, and all leaks healed following opening of the cervical incision and drainage. None of the patients died in the hospital, and 30-day mortality was 2.5% (1/40). Median number of lymph nodes removed was 20 (range, 3-38). In 33 patients with known lymph node locations, median of four (range, 0-12) nodes was obtained from the mediastinum, and median of 15 (range, 1-26) was obtained from the abdomen. R0 resection was achieved in 94.7% of patients. At the end of the follow-up period, 25 patients were alive, 13 were deceased, and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. For patients with EC, median disease-free survival was 20 months (range, 3-45). Transhiatal RE, by experience, is a feasible albeit evolving oncologic operation with low hospital mortality. The benefits include minimally invasive mediastinal dissection without thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. A reasonable operative time with minimal blood loss and postoperative morbidity can be achieved, in spite of the technically demanding nature of the procedure. Broader use of this technology in a setting of high-volume comprehensive surgical programs will almost certainly reduce the complication rates. Robotic tanshiatal esophagectomy with the elimination of a thoracic approach should be considered an option for the appropriate patient population in a comprehensive esophageal program.

摘要

微创食管切除术已成为一种重要的手术方法,可用于管理具有明确边界的食管癌(EC),与开放性手术相比,其发病率较低,住院时间较短。本文描述了经胸入路机器人食管切除术(RE)在胸段食管解剖和相关发病率方面的经验。2007 年 3 月至 2010 年 11 月,该研究所对 40 例有适应证的食管患者进行了经胸入路 RE。前瞻性收集了所有患者的临床资料。在接受 RE 的 40 例患者中,1 例有广泛的良性狭窄,1 例有高级别异型增生,38 例有 EC。5 例患者从机器人转为开放性手术。中位手术时间和估计失血量分别为 311 分钟和 97.2ml。中位重症监护病房住院时间为 1 天(范围 0-16 天),中位住院时间为 9 天(范围 6-36 天)。术后常见的并发症包括吻合口狭窄(n=27)、喉返神经麻痹(n=14)、吻合口漏(n=10)、肺炎(n=8)和胸腔积液(n=18)。与文献报道相比,喉返神经麻痹(35%)和漏诊率(25%)的发生率略高。然而,所有声带损伤均为暂时性的,所有漏诊均在颈段切口开放引流后愈合。无患者在院内死亡,30 天死亡率为 2.5%(1/40)。中位淋巴结清扫数为 20 枚(范围 3-38 枚)。在 33 例已知淋巴结位置的患者中,纵隔获得 4 枚(范围 0-12 枚),腹部获得 15 枚(范围 1-26 枚)。94.7%的患者达到 R0 切除。在随访结束时,25 例患者存活,13 例死亡,2 例失访。对于 EC 患者,中位无病生存期为 20 个月(范围 3-45 个月)。经胸入路 RE 是一种可行的、具有挑战性的肿瘤学手术,术后院内死亡率低。其优点包括微创纵隔解剖,无需开胸或胸腔镜。尽管手术技术要求较高,但仍能实现合理的手术时间、最小的出血量和术后发病率。在大容量综合手术项目中更广泛地应用这项技术,几乎肯定会降低并发症发生率。对于综合性食管项目中的合适患者人群,应考虑采用无胸腔入路的机器人经胸食管切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验