Suppr超能文献

奥康纳等人关于动物饲养场与公共卫生的系统评价:关键缺陷可能影响结论。

O'Connor et al. systematic review regarding animal feeding operations and public health: critical flaws may compromise conclusions.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Suite W7010-E, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 31;6(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0575-7.

Abstract

In this comment, we summarize several scientific concerns with the recently published systematic review from O'Connor and colleagues that examined the relationship between proximity to animal-feeding operations and health of individuals in nearby communities. The authors utilized a bias tool not designed for environmental health research, erroneously excluded important studies, and incorrectly interpreted others. As a result, the conclusions drawn in the review misrepresent the evidence from the published literature, limiting its value to policymakers, researchers, and the public.

摘要

在这条评论中,我们总结了奥康纳及其同事最近发表的一项系统评价中存在的几个科学问题,该评价研究了动物饲养场与附近社区居民健康之间的关系。作者使用了一种并非专为环境卫生研究设计的偏倚工具,错误地排除了重要的研究,并对其他研究做出了错误的解读。因此,该综述得出的结论歪曲了已发表文献中的证据,限制了其对政策制定者、研究人员和公众的价值。

相似文献

7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

10
Industrial Food Animal Production and Community Health.工业食品动物生产与社区健康。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015 Sep;2(3):259-71. doi: 10.1007/s40572-015-0061-0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验