Behnke S H
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(1):115-26.
This article discusses the 1975 Supreme Court opinion O'Connor v. Donaldson. The article first examines the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the basis for the O'Connor ruling. It then looks carefully at the Court's conclusions, with particular attention to the Court's reasoning and analysis. The article goes on to look at how the Supreme Court has interpreted O'Connor on subsequent occasions and suggests that the Court has often misconstrued its own decision. The article concludes by offering thoughts and commentary on the O'Connor opinion and its progeny.
本文讨论了1975年最高法院关于奥康纳诉唐纳森案的判决意见。文章首先审视了第十四条修正案的正当程序条款,这是奥康纳裁决的依据。接着仔细研究了最高法院的结论,尤其关注法院的推理和分析。文章进而探讨了最高法院在随后的场合中如何解释奥康纳案,并指出最高法院常常误解了其自身的判决。文章最后对奥康纳案的判决意见及其衍生影响提出了思考和评论。