Suppr超能文献

奥康纳诉唐纳森案:重述一个经典案例并发现一些修正主义历史。

O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.

作者信息

Behnke S H

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(1):115-26.

Abstract

This article discusses the 1975 Supreme Court opinion O'Connor v. Donaldson. The article first examines the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the basis for the O'Connor ruling. It then looks carefully at the Court's conclusions, with particular attention to the Court's reasoning and analysis. The article goes on to look at how the Supreme Court has interpreted O'Connor on subsequent occasions and suggests that the Court has often misconstrued its own decision. The article concludes by offering thoughts and commentary on the O'Connor opinion and its progeny.

摘要

本文讨论了1975年最高法院关于奥康纳诉唐纳森案的判决意见。文章首先审视了第十四条修正案的正当程序条款,这是奥康纳裁决的依据。接着仔细研究了最高法院的结论,尤其关注法院的推理和分析。文章进而探讨了最高法院在随后的场合中如何解释奥康纳案,并指出最高法院常常误解了其自身的判决。文章最后对奥康纳案的判决意见及其衍生影响提出了思考和评论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验