Amos R S
Z Rheumatol. 1987 Mar-Apr;46(2):76-8.
To demonstrate the efficacy and compatibility of sulphasalazine as a long term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, use of the substance (known in Britain as Salazopyrin EN and in Germany as Azulfidine RA) has been compared with that of intramuscular gold. Using very stringent and novel criteria for success--a patient must have no more than one swollen joint after a minimum of 2 years treatment, with less than 30 min of early morning stiffness and still be receiving the drug--the cumulative efficacy of each drug was very similar (32% with sulphasalazine vs 44% with gold). Toxic events leading to drug withdrawal, however, were twice as frequent with gold, and the type of toxic event encountered was considered to be potentially much more serious than those with sulphasalazine (96% of the toxic events on gold fell into the mucocutaneous, renal or haematological groups).
为证明柳氮磺胺吡啶作为类风湿性关节炎长期治疗药物的疗效和耐受性,已将该药物(在英国称为Salazopyrin EN,在德国称为Azulfidine RA)与肌肉注射金制剂的疗效和耐受性进行了比较。采用非常严格和新颖的成功标准——患者在至少2年的治疗后关节肿胀不超过1个,晨僵时间少于30分钟且仍在接受药物治疗——每种药物的累积疗效非常相似(柳氮磺胺吡啶为32%,金制剂为44%)。然而,导致停药的毒性事件在使用金制剂时的发生率是柳氮磺胺吡啶的两倍,而且金制剂所出现的毒性事件类型被认为可能比柳氮磺胺吡啶的毒性事件严重得多(金制剂96%的毒性事件属于皮肤黏膜、肾脏或血液学类别)。