Anselme Patrick, Edeş Neslihan, Tabrik Sepideh, Güntürkün Onur
Faculty of Psychology, Department of Biopsychology, University of Bochum, 150 Universitätsstraße, D-44801 Bochum, Germany.
Faculty of Psychology, Department of Biopsychology, University of Bochum, 150 Universitätsstraße, D-44801 Bochum, Germany; Bogaziçi University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Bebeck, Istanbul 34342, Turkey.
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Jan 15;336:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
When rodents are given a free choice between a variable option and a constant option, they may prefer variability. This preference is even sometimes increased following repeated administration of a dopamine agonist. The present study was the first to examine preference for variability under the systemic administration of a dopamine agonist, apomorphine (Apo), in birds. Experiment 1 tested the drug-free preference and the propensity to choose of pigeons for a constant over a variable delay. It appeared that they preferred and decided more quickly to peck at the optimal delay option. Experiment 2 assessed the effects of a repeated injection of Apo on delay preference, in comparison with previous control tests within the same individuals. Apo treatment might have decreased the number of pecks at the constant option across the different experimental phases, but failed to induce a preference for the variable option. In Experiment 3, two groups of pigeons (Apo-sensitized and saline) were used in order to avoid inhomogeneity in treatments. They had to choose between a 50% probability option and a 5-s delay option. Conditioned pecking and the propensity to choose were higher in the Apo-sensitized pigeons, but, in each group, the pigeons showed indifference between the two options. This experiment also showed that long-term behavioral sensitization to Apo can occur independently of a conditioning process. These results suggest that Apo sensitization can enhance the attractiveness of conditioned cues, while having no effect on the development of a preference for variable-delay and probabilistic schedules of reinforcement.
当啮齿动物在可变选项和固定选项之间自由选择时,它们可能更喜欢可变选项。这种偏好甚至有时在重复给予多巴胺激动剂后会增强。本研究首次在鸟类中研究了多巴胺激动剂阿扑吗啡(Apo)全身给药情况下对可变选项的偏好。实验1测试了鸽子在无药物情况下对固定延迟和可变延迟的偏好以及选择倾向。结果显示,它们更喜欢并更快地决定啄击最佳延迟选项。实验2评估了重复注射Apo对延迟偏好的影响,并与同一批个体之前的对照测试进行比较。Apo处理可能在不同实验阶段减少了对固定选项的啄击次数,但未能诱导对可变选项的偏好。在实验3中,使用了两组鸽子(Apo致敏组和生理盐水组)以避免处理的不均匀性。它们必须在50%概率选项和5秒延迟选项之间进行选择。Apo致敏组鸽子的条件性啄击和选择倾向更高,但在每组中,鸽子对两个选项都表现出无差异。该实验还表明,对Apo的长期行为致敏可以独立于条件作用过程发生。这些结果表明,Apo致敏可以增强条件线索的吸引力,而对可变延迟和概率性强化程序偏好的发展没有影响。