• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴露于自由选择环境中的蜜蜂的不确定性处理:来自脊椎动物的经验教训。

Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

机构信息

Department of Biopsychology, University of Bochum, 150 Universitätsstraße, D-44801, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2024-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1441-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-018-1441-x
PMID:29435964
Abstract

Bees tend to avoid or to show indifference to uncertain ("risky") relative to certain ("safe") food rewards, whether in nectar volume or in nectar concentration. The unattractiveness of uncertain food rewards is also sometimes independent of the energy budget of bees. This pattern of responses seems to differ from that observed in mammals and birds, which may exhibit a strong preference for the uncertainty over the certainty of food delivery on a given trial in dual-choice tasks. Upon analysis of the conditions that determine preference and aversion for uncertain food rewards in "higher" vertebrates, I attempt to demonstrate that bees react to uncertainty in a similar way. It is argued that, because of their social organization and of the type of resources they seek, bees are essentially exposed to situations in which "higher" vertebrates find reward uncertainty unattractive as well. The nature of their representation of food distribution is discussed, and it is suggested that scout bees may differ from recruits with respect to uncertainty processing.

摘要

蜜蜂往往会回避或对不确定(“风险”)的食物奖赏表现出漠不关心,而偏爱确定(“安全”)的食物奖赏,无论这种奖赏是在花蜜量还是在花蜜浓度上有所不同。不确定食物奖赏的无吸引力有时也与蜜蜂的能量预算无关。这种反应模式似乎与哺乳动物和鸟类观察到的不同,哺乳动物和鸟类在双选择任务中,在给定的试验中,对食物传递的不确定性表现出强烈的偏好。在分析“高等”脊椎动物决定对不确定食物奖赏的偏好和厌恶的条件时,我试图证明蜜蜂以类似的方式对不确定性做出反应。有人认为,由于它们的社会组织和它们所寻求的资源类型,蜜蜂本质上处于“高等”脊椎动物也会发现奖励不确定性没有吸引力的情况下。讨论了它们对食物分布的表示的性质,并提出侦察蜂可能在不确定性处理方面与新兵不同。

相似文献

1
Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.暴露于自由选择环境中的蜜蜂的不确定性处理:来自脊椎动物的经验教训。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2024-2036. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1441-x.
2
Colour learning when foraging for nectar and pollen: bees learn two colours at once.在觅食花蜜和花粉时的颜色学习:蜜蜂能同时学习两种颜色。
Biol Lett. 2015 Sep;11(9):20150628. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0628.
3
Parameters of variable reward distributions that affect risk sensitivity of honey bees.影响蜜蜂风险敏感性的可变奖励分布参数。
J Exp Biol. 2007 Jan;210(Pt 2):269-77. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02656.
4
Risk sensitivity for amounts of and delay to rewards: adaptation for uncertainty or by-product of reward rate maximising?对奖励数量和奖励延迟的风险敏感性:是对不确定性的适应还是奖励率最大化的副产品?
Behav Processes. 2012 Feb;89(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.08.016. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
5
The response of the honeybee dance to uncertain rewards.蜜蜂舞蹈对不确定奖励的反应。
J Exp Biol. 2008 Nov;211(Pt 21):3392-400. doi: 10.1242/jeb.017624.
6
Phantom alternatives influence food preferences in the eastern honeybee Apis cerana.替代物影响东方蜜蜂(Apis cerana)的食物偏好。
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):509-17. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12288. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
7
Nectar quality perception by honey bees (Apis mellifera ligustica).意大利蜜蜂对花蜜质量的感知
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Nov;127(4):341-51. doi: 10.1037/a0032613. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
8
Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on choice between small certain rewards and large uncertain rewards in rats.伏隔核核心损伤对大鼠在小的确定性奖励和大的不确定性奖励之间选择的影响。
BMC Neurosci. 2005 May 28;6:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-6-37.
9
Multiple Mechanisms for Processing Reward Uncertainty in the Primate Basal Forebrain.灵长类动物基底前脑处理奖励不确定性的多种机制。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jul 27;36(30):7852-64. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1123-16.2016.
10
The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.在大黄蜂中对糖浓度辨别和对比评价的心理物理学研究。
Anim Cogn. 2013 May;16(3):417-27. doi: 10.1007/s10071-012-0582-y. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Honey Bees Can Use Sequence Learning to Predict Rewards from a Prior Unrewarded Visual Stimulus.蜜蜂可以利用序列学习从先前未得到奖励的视觉刺激中预测奖励。
Insects. 2025 Mar 31;16(4):358. doi: 10.3390/insects16040358.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is independent of conditioning and increases conditioned pecking, but not preference, in pigeons.对阿扑吗啡的长期行为致敏作用独立于条件作用,且会增加鸽子的条件性啄击,但不会增加其偏好。
Behav Brain Res. 2018 Jan 15;336:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Bumblebee visits to Impatiens spp.: pattern and efficiency.大黄蜂对凤仙花属植物的访花行为:模式与效率
Oecologia. 1988 Aug;76(3):364-370. doi: 10.1007/BF00377030.
3
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
鸽子的次优选择:选择主要基于条件性强化物的价值,而非整体强化率。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20. doi: 10.1037/xan0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
4
When good news leads to bad choices.当好消息导致错误选择时。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):23-40. doi: 10.1002/jeab.192.
5
Irrational choice and the value of information.非理性选择与信息价值
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 9;5:13874. doi: 10.1038/srep13874.
6
Does reward unpredictability reflect risk?奖励的不可预测性是否反映了风险?
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Mar 1;280:119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Suboptimal choice by pigeons may result from the diminishing effect of nonreinforcement.鸽子的次优选择可能源于无强化作用的递减效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):12-21. doi: 10.1037/xan0000010.
8
On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases.关于认知偏差的进化解释。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Aug;28(8):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
9
Deep homology of arthropod central complex and vertebrate basal ganglia.节肢动物中枢复合体与脊椎动物基底神经节的深度同源性。
Science. 2013 Apr 12;340(6129):157-61. doi: 10.1126/science.1231828.
10
Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging.资源多样性和景观水平均一性驱动本地蜜蜂觅食。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):555-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1208682110. Epub 2012 Dec 24.