Tsuchiyagaito Aki, Hirano Yoshiyuki, Asano Kenichi, Oshima Fumiyo, Nagaoka Sawako, Takebayashi Yoshitake, Matsumoto Koji, Masuda Yoshitada, Iyo Masaomi, Shimizu Eiji, Nakagawa Akiko
Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Kanazawa University, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Chiba University and University of Fukui, Suita, Japan.
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 15;8:143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00143. eCollection 2017.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and is also applicable to patients with both OCD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, previous studies have reported that CBT for patients with both OCD and ASD might be less effective than for patients with OCD alone. In addition, there is no evidence as to why autistic traits might be risk factors. Therefore, we investigated whether comorbidity between ASD and OCD may significantly affect treatment outcome and discovered predictors of CBT outcomes using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. A total of 39 patients, who were diagnosed with OCD, were enrolled in this study. Of these, except for 2 dropout cases, 15 patients were diagnosed with ASD, and 22 patients were diagnosed with OCD without ASD. Both groups took CBT for 11-20 sessions. First, to examine the effectiveness of CBT for OCD patients with and without ASD, we compared CBT outcomes between the two groups. Second, to investigate how the structural abnormality profile of the brain at pretreatment influenced CBT outcomes, we performed a structural MRI comparison focusing on the gray matter volume of the whole brain in both patients with only OCD, and those with both OCD and ASD. In order to discover neurostructural predictors of CBT outcomes besides autistic traits, we divided our samples again into two groups of those who did and those who did not remit after CBT, and repeated the analysis taking autistic traits into account. The results showed that OCD patients with ASD responded significantly less well to CBT. The OCD patients with ASD had much less gray matter volume in the left occipital lobe than OCD patients without ASD. The non-remission group had a significantly smaller volume of gray matter in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) compared with the remission group, after having partialed out autistic traits. These results indicate that the abnormalities in DLPFC negatively affect the CBT outcome, regardless of the severity of the autistic traits.
认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗强迫症(OCD)的一种有效方法,也适用于同时患有强迫症和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的患者。然而,先前的研究报告称,针对同时患有强迫症和自闭症谱系障碍的患者进行的认知行为疗法可能不如仅针对强迫症患者的疗法有效。此外,尚无证据表明自闭症特质为何可能是风险因素。因此,我们调查了自闭症谱系障碍与强迫症的共病是否会显著影响治疗效果,并利用结构磁共振成像(MRI)数据发现了认知行为疗法治疗效果的预测因素。本研究共纳入了39名被诊断为强迫症的患者。其中,除2例退出病例外,15例患者被诊断为患有自闭症谱系障碍,22例患者被诊断为患有强迫症但无自闭症谱系障碍。两组均接受了11至20次的认知行为疗法治疗。首先,为了检验认知行为疗法对有无自闭症谱系障碍的强迫症患者的有效性,我们比较了两组的认知行为疗法治疗效果。其次,为了研究治疗前大脑的结构异常情况如何影响认知行为疗法的治疗效果,我们对仅患有强迫症的患者以及同时患有强迫症和自闭症谱系障碍的患者进行了结构MRI比较,重点关注全脑灰质体积。为了发现除自闭症特质外认知行为疗法治疗效果的神经结构预测因素,我们将样本再次分为认知行为疗法治疗后缓解和未缓解的两组,并在考虑自闭症特质的情况下重复进行分析。结果表明,患有自闭症谱系障碍的强迫症患者对认知行为疗法的反应明显较差。患有自闭症谱系障碍的强迫症患者左枕叶的灰质体积比没有自闭症谱系障碍的强迫症患者少得多。在排除自闭症特质后,未缓解组的左背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)灰质体积明显小于缓解组。这些结果表明,无论自闭症特质的严重程度如何,背外侧前额叶皮质的异常都会对认知行为疗法的治疗效果产生负面影响。