Suppr超能文献

助人技能培训前后帮助者的自我评估偏差

Helpers' Self-Assessment Biases Before and after Helping Skills Training.

作者信息

Jaeken Marine, Zech Emmanuelle, Brison Céline, Verhofstadt Lesley L, Van Broeck Nady, Mikolajczak Moïra

机构信息

Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 15;8:1377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01377. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Several studies have shown that therapists are generally biased concerning their performed helping skills, as compared to judges' ratings. As clients' ratings of therapists' performance are better predictors of psychotherapy effectiveness than judges' ratings, this study examined the validity and effectiveness of a helping skills training program at reducing novice helpers' self-enhancement biases concerning their helping skills, in comparison to their clients' ratings. Helping skills were assessed by three objective measures (a knowledge multiple choice test, a video test and a role play), as well as by a self- and peer-reported questionnaire. In addition, some performed helping skills' correlates (relationship quality, session quality, and helpers' therapeutic attitudes) were assessed both by helpers and their simulated helpees. Seventy-two sophomores in psychology participated to this study, 37 being assigned to a 12-h helping skills training program, and 35 to a control group. Helpers were expected to assess the aforementioned performed helping skills and correlates as being better than their helpees' assessments at pretest, thus revealing a self-enhancement bias. At posttest, we expected that trained helpers would objectively exhibit better helping skills than untrained helpers while beginning to underestimate their performance, thus indexing a self-diminishment bias. In contrast, we hypothesized that untrained helpers would continue to overestimate their performance. Our hypotheses were only partly confirmed but results reflected a skilled-unaware pattern among trainees. Trained helpers went either from a pretest overestimation to a posttest equivalence (performed helping skills and performed therapeutic attitudes), or from a pretest equivalence to a posttest underestimation (performed session quality and performed therapeutic relationship), as compared to helpees' ratings. Results showed that trained helpers improved on all helping skills objective measures and that helpees' perceptions of their performance had increased at posttest. In conclusion, helping skills training leads helpers not only to improve their helping skills but also to have more doubts about their skills, two variables associated with psychotherapy outcome.

摘要

多项研究表明,与法官的评分相比,治疗师通常对自己所具备的帮助技能存在偏见。由于客户对治疗师表现的评分比法官的评分更能预测心理治疗的效果,本研究考察了一项帮助技能培训项目在减少新手助人者对自身帮助技能的自我提升偏见方面的有效性,同时与客户的评分进行比较。通过三种客观测量方法(知识多项选择题测试、视频测试和角色扮演)以及一份自我和同伴报告问卷来评估帮助技能。此外,一些已展现的帮助技能的相关因素(关系质量、会谈质量和助人者的治疗态度)由助人者及其模拟受助者进行评估。72名心理学专业二年级学生参与了本研究,其中37人被分配到一个12小时的帮助技能培训项目,35人被分配到对照组。预计助人者在预测试时会认为上述已展现的帮助技能及相关因素比受助者的评估更好,从而显示出自我提升偏见。在测试后,我们预计经过培训的助人者在客观上会比未受过培训的助人者展现出更好的帮助技能,同时开始低估自己的表现,从而表现出自我贬低偏见。相比之下,我们假设未受过培训的助人者会继续高估自己的表现。我们的假设仅得到部分证实,但结果反映出受训者中存在技能无意识模式。与受助者的评分相比,经过培训的助人者在测试后,要么从预测试时的高估转变为等价(已展现的帮助技能和已展现的治疗态度),要么从预测试时的等价转变为低估(已展现的会谈质量和已展现的治疗关系)。结果表明,经过培训的助人者在所有帮助技能客观测量方法上都有所提高,并且受助者在测试后对其表现的看法有所增加。总之,帮助技能培训不仅使助人者提高了他们的帮助技能,而且还使他们对自己的技能产生了更多怀疑,这两个变量都与心理治疗结果相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d97/5559667/a2ffb24bd796/fpsyg-08-01377-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验