Suppr超能文献

3分前列腺病变:PI-RADS v2的灰色地带。

Score 3 prostate lesions: a gray zone for PI-RADS v2.

作者信息

Scialpi Michele, Martorana Eugenio, Aisa Maria Cristina, Rondoni Valeria, D'Andrea Alfredo, Bianchi Giampaolo

机构信息

Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Radiology 2, Perugia University, S.Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, S. Andrea Delle Fratte, Perugia, Italy.

Division of Urology, University Hospital, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Turk J Urol. 2017 Sep;43(3):237-240. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.01058. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Abstract

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) does not offer a precise guidance on the clinical management (biopsy or not biopsy) for PI-RADS v2 score 3 lesions. Lesion volume calculated on biparametric MRI (bpMRI) [T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)] by introducing a cut-off of 0.5 mL, allows to distinguish the lesions assigned by the multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to the category PI-RADS v2 score 3 in two subgroups: a) Indolent or low risk lesions with volume <0.5 mL, and b) Significant or high risk lesions with volume ≥0.5 mL. For mpMRI lesions assigned to PI-RADS v2 score 3, we suggest the following management: 1) Subgroup a (low-risk lesion): Clinical surveillance (accurate evaluation of age and clinical informations, periodic monitoring of prostate specific antigen value and repeated bpMRI 1 year later); 2) Subgroup b (high-risk lesion): Targeted biopsy. The proposed management would reduce the use of unnecessary biopsies and increase the diagostic yield of significant prostate cancer of approximately 50% and 30% respectively. These approaches encourage the radiologist to adopt MRI lesion volume to improve PI-RADS v2 and to optimize the management of PI-RADS v2 score 3 lesions.

摘要

前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2)对于PI-RADS v2评分3分的病变在临床管理(是否活检)方面未提供精确指导。通过引入0.5 mL的临界值,在双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)[T2加权成像(T2WI)和扩散加权成像(DWI)]上计算病变体积,能够将多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)判定为PI-RADS v2评分3分的病变分为两个亚组:a)体积<0.5 mL的惰性或低风险病变,以及b)体积≥0.5 mL的显著或高风险病变。对于判定为PI-RADS v2评分3分的mpMRI病变,我们建议如下管理:1)亚组a(低风险病变):临床监测(准确评估年龄和临床信息,定期监测前列腺特异性抗原值并在1年后重复进行bpMRI);2)亚组b(高风险病变):靶向活检。所建议的管理方法将减少不必要活检的使用,并分别使显著前列腺癌的诊断率提高约50%和30%。这些方法鼓励放射科医生采用MRI病变体积来改进PI-RADS v2,并优化PI-RADS v2评分3分病变的管理。

相似文献

1
Score 3 prostate lesions: a gray zone for PI-RADS v2.
Turk J Urol. 2017 Sep;43(3):237-240. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.01058. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
2
Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;53(1):283-291. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27283. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Biparametric MRI of the prostate.
Turk J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(4):401-409. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.06978. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
6
Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis.
Life (Basel). 2022 May 28;12(6):804. doi: 10.3390/life12060804.
9
Is contrast enhancement needed for diagnostic prostate MRI?
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):499-509. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.31.
10
Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Apr;212(4):839-846. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20498. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

2
Toward a Refined PI-RADS: The Feasibility and Limitations of More Informative Metrics in Reviewing MRI Scans.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Sep;62(3):673-690. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29754. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
8
Management Strategy for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions.
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Dec;24(12):561-570. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01187-0. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
9
Results of fusion prostate biopsy comparing with cognitive and systematic biopsy.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):15085-15090. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05293-x. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
10
Study of iron metabolism based on T2* mapping sequences in PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions.
Front Oncol. 2023 May 18;13:1185057. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1185057. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Is contrast enhancement needed for diagnostic prostate MRI?
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):499-509. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.05.31.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study.
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
8
Re: PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know.
Clin Radiol. 2016 Sep;71(9):934-5. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
Biparametric MRI: a further improvement to PIRADS 2.0?
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):297-8. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15598.
10
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jun;206(6):1179-83. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15765. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验