Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
J Ment Health. 2020 Aug;29(4):431-438. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1370631. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
: Case-mix classification is a focus of international attention in considering how best to manage and fund services, by providing a basis for fairer comparison of resource utilization. Yet there is little evidence of the best ways to establish case mix for child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS).: To develop a case mix classification for CAMHS that is clinically meaningful and predictive of number of appointments attended and to investigate the influence of presenting problems, context and complexity factors and provider variation.: We analysed 4573 completed episodes of outpatient care from 11 English CAMHS. Cluster analysis, regression trees and a conceptual classification based on clinical best practice guidelines were compared regarding their ability to predict number of appointments, using mixed effects negative binomial regression.: The conceptual classification is clinically meaningful and did as well as data-driven classifications in accounting for number of appointments. There was little evidence for effects of complexity or context factors, with the possible exception of school attendance problems. Substantial variation in resource provision between providers was not explained well by case mix.: The conceptually-derived classification merits further testing and development in the context of collaborative decision making.
病例组合分类是国际关注的焦点,通过为更公平地比较资源利用情况提供基础,来考虑如何最好地管理和资助服务。然而,在确定儿童和青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)的病例组合方面,几乎没有最佳方法的证据。
开发一种具有临床意义且可预测就诊次数的 CAMHS 病例组合分类,并研究主要问题、背景和复杂因素以及提供方差异的影响。
我们分析了来自 11 个英国 CAMHS 的 4573 个门诊治疗完成的病例。聚类分析、回归树和基于临床最佳实践指南的概念分类在使用混合效应负二项回归来预测就诊次数方面的能力进行了比较。
概念分类具有临床意义,在解释就诊次数方面与数据驱动的分类一样有效。复杂或背景因素的影响几乎没有证据,除了学校出勤率问题。提供者之间在资源提供方面的大量差异不能很好地用病例组合来解释。
概念上得出的分类值得在协作决策的背景下进一步测试和开发。