Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 16;6(8):e006355. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006355.
The CHADS score has mainly been used to predict the likelihood of cerebrovascular accidents in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, increasing attention is being paid to this scoring system for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the value of the CHADS score in predicting cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events in coronary artery disease patients without atrial fibrillation.
This was a multicenter, observational cohort study. The subjects had been admitted to one of the participating institutions with coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention. We calculated the CHADS scores for 7082 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; males, 71.9%) without clinical evidence of atrial fibrillation. Subjects were subdivided into low- (0-1), intermediate- (2-3), and high-score (4-6) groups and followed for 1 year. The end point was a composite of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke at 1-year follow-up. Rates of triple-vessel/left main trunk disease correlated positively with CHADS score categories. CHADS scores among single, double, and triple-vessel/left main trunk groups were 2 (1-2), 2 (1-3), and 2 (2-3), respectively (<0.001). A total of 194 patients (2.8%) had a cardiovascular/cerebrovascular event, and Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher probability of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events in proportion to a higher CHADS score (log-rank test, <0.001). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis identified CHADS score (per 1 point) as an independent predictor of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.47; <0.001).
This large cohort study indicated that the CHADS score is useful for the prediction of cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events in coronary artery disease patients without atrial fibrillation.
CHADS 评分主要用于预测心房颤动患者发生脑血管意外的可能性。然而,人们越来越关注该评分系统在冠状动脉疾病患者的风险分层中的作用。我们研究了 CHADS 评分在预测无房颤的冠状动脉疾病患者发生心血管/脑血管事件中的价值。
这是一项多中心、观察性队列研究。研究对象为因冠状动脉疾病需行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗而入住一家参与机构的患者。我们为 7082 例(平均年龄 69.7 岁;男性占 71.9%)无临床房颤证据的患者计算了 CHADS 评分。患者被分为低危组(0-1 分)、中危组(2-3 分)和高危组(4-6 分),并随访 1 年。终点事件为 1 年随访时发生的心血管/脑血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和缺血性卒中的复合终点。三支血管/左主干病变的发生率与 CHADS 评分呈正相关。单支血管、双支血管和三支血管/左主干病变组的 CHADS 评分分别为 2(1-2)、2(1-3)和 2(2-3)(<0.001)。共有 194 例患者(2.8%)发生心血管/脑血管事件,Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,心血管/脑血管事件的发生概率随 CHADS 评分的升高而显著增加(对数秩检验,<0.001)。多变量 Cox 风险分析确定 CHADS 评分(每增加 1 分)是心血管/脑血管事件的独立预测因素(风险比,1.31;95%CI,1.17-1.47;<0.001)。
这项大型队列研究表明,CHADS 评分可用于预测无房颤的冠状动脉疾病患者发生心血管/脑血管事件。