• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CHADS、CHADS-VASc和CHADS-VASc-HS评分对择期药物洗脱支架置入治疗初发冠状动脉狭窄后临床结局的预后影响

Prognostic Impacts of CHADS, CHADS-VASc, and CHADS-VASc-HS Scores on Clinical Outcomes After Elective Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for De Novo Coronary Stenosis.

作者信息

Ukaji Tomoaki, Ishikawa Tetsuya, Nakamura Hidehiko, Mizutani Yukiko, Yamada Kouta, Shimura Masatoshi, Kondo Yuki, Tamura Yohei, Koshikawa Yuri, Hisauchi Itaru, Nakahara Shiro, Itabashi Yuji, Kobayashi Sayuki, Taguchi Isao

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Dokkyo Medical University, Saitama Medical Center Koshigaya Japan.

出版信息

Circ Rep. 2023 Mar 15;5(4):123-132. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0120. eCollection 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0120
PMID:37025938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10072895/
Abstract

The prognostic impact of CHADS, CHADS-VASc, and CHADS-VASc-HS scores on clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement has not been fully elucidated. The present study was a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center, and lesion-based study. Target lesion failure (TLF), comprising cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, occurred in 7.1% of 872 consecutive de novo coronary lesions in 586 patients. These patients were electively and exclusively treated by DESs from January 2016 to January 2022 until July 2022 with a mean (±SD) observational interval of 411±438 days. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that CHADS-VASc-HS scores ≥7 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.800; 95% CI 1.06-3.05; P=0.029) was a significant predictor of cumulative TLF among 24 variables evaluated. CHADS scores ≥2 (HR 3.213; 95% CI 1.32-7.80; P=0.010) and CHADS-VASc scores ≥5 (HR 1.980; 95% CI 1.10-3.55; P=0.022) were also significant in the multivariate analysis. Pairwise comparisons of receiver operating characteristic curves for CHADS score ≥2, CHADS-VASc score ≥5, and CHADS-VASc-HS score ≥7 showed they were equivalent in terms of predicting the incidence of TLF, with areas under the curve of 0.568, 0.575, and 0.573, respectively. All 3 cardiocerebrovascular thromboembolism risk scores were strong predictors of the incidence of cumulative mid-term TLF after elective DES placement, with cut-off values of 2, 5, and 7, respectively, and equivalent prognostic impacts.

摘要

CHADS、CHADS-VASc和CHADS-VASc-HS评分对药物洗脱支架(DES)置入术后临床结局的预后影响尚未完全阐明。本研究是一项回顾性、非随机、单中心且基于病变的研究。在586例患者的872处连续新发冠状动脉病变中,目标病变失败(TLF,包括心源性死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建)发生率为7.1%。这些患者在2016年1月至2022年1月期间接受DES选择性且专门治疗,直至2022年7月,平均(±标准差)观察期为411±438天。多因素Cox比例风险分析显示,在评估的24个变量中,CHADS-VASc-HS评分≥7(风险比[HR]1.800;95%置信区间1.06 - 3.05;P = 0.029)是累积TLF的显著预测因素。CHADS评分≥2(HR 3.213;95%置信区间1.32 - 7.80;P = 0.010)和CHADS-VASc评分≥5(HR 1.980;95%置信区间1.10 - 3.55;P = 0.022)在多因素分析中也具有显著性。CHADS评分≥2、CHADS-VASc评分≥5和CHADS-VASc-HS评分≥7的受试者工作特征曲线的两两比较显示,它们在预测TLF发生率方面相当,曲线下面积分别为0.568、0.575和0.573。所有3种心脑血管血栓栓塞风险评分都是择期DES置入术后累积中期TLF发生率的强预测因素,截断值分别为2、5和7,且预后影响相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a90/10072895/91a0e565fa25/circrep-5-123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a90/10072895/91a0e565fa25/circrep-5-123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a90/10072895/91a0e565fa25/circrep-5-123-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic Impacts of CHADS, CHADS-VASc, and CHADS-VASc-HS Scores on Clinical Outcomes After Elective Drug-Eluting Stent Placement for De Novo Coronary Stenosis.CHADS、CHADS-VASc和CHADS-VASc-HS评分对择期药物洗脱支架置入治疗初发冠状动脉狭窄后临床结局的预后影响
Circ Rep. 2023 Mar 15;5(4):123-132. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-22-0120. eCollection 2023 Apr 10.
2
Prognostic value of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for post-discharge outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者出院后结局的预后价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 24;99(30):e21321. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021321.
3
Prediction of coronary artery disease severity using CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores and a newly defined CHA2DS2-VASc-HS score.使用 CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分以及新定义的 CHA2DS2-VASc-HS 评分预测冠状动脉疾病严重程度。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 15;113(6):950-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.056. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
4
Predictive value of CHADS and CHADS-VASc scores for coronary artery lesions and in-hospital prognosis of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.CHADS 和 CHADS-VASc 评分对急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉病变及院内预后的预测价值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Sep 15;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02257-2.
5
Study on the predictive ability of emergency CHADS score and CHADS-VASc score for coronary artery disease and prognosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急诊CHADS评分和CHADS-VASc评分对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者冠状动脉疾病及预后的预测能力研究
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jul;14(7):2611-2620. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-763.
6
Comparison between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score for risk stratification of ischemic stroke in Japanese patients with non-valvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation not receiving anticoagulant therapy.未接受抗凝治疗的日本非瓣膜性阵发性心房颤动患者缺血性卒中风险分层的CHADS2与CHA2DS2-VASc评分比较
Int Heart J. 2014;55(2):119-25. doi: 10.1536/ihj.13-242. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
7
CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED as predictors of outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc和HAS-BLED作为接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的房颤患者预后的预测指标。
Thromb Res. 2014 Apr;133(4):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
8
Comparison of the CHADS, CHADS-VASc and RCHADS Scores in Japanese Patients with Non-valvular Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Not Receiving Anticoagulation Therapy.未接受抗凝治疗的日本非瓣膜性阵发性心房颤动患者的CHADS、CHADS-VASc和RCHADS评分比较
Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;56(21):2827-2836. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8914-17. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of platelet reactivity in acute coronary syndrome.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为急性冠状动脉综合征血小板反应性的预测因子。
J Cardiol. 2021 Apr;77(4):375-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
10
CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为预测阵发性心房颤动左心房消融结局的指标。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut210. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Midterm safety and efficacy of elective drug-coated balloon angioplasty in comparison to drug-eluting stents for unrestrictive de novo coronary lesions: A single center retrospective study.择期药物涂层球囊血管成形术与药物洗脱支架治疗非限制性初发型冠状动脉病变的中期安全性和疗效:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Cardiol. 2023 Jun;81(6):537-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.11.014. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
2
Body Mass Index and Major Adverse Events During Chronic Antiplatelet Monotherapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents - Results From the HOST-EXAM Trial.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性抗血小板单药治疗期间的体重指数与主要不良事件——HOST-EXAM试验结果
Circ J. 2023 Jan 25;87(2):268-276. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0344. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3
A Simple Risk Score to Differentiate Between Coronary Artery Obstruction and Coronary Artery Spasm of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation.一种简单的风险评分,用于区分急性冠状动脉综合征伴非持续 ST 段抬高患者的冠状动脉阻塞与冠状动脉痉挛。
Circ J. 2022 Sep 22;86(10):1509-1518. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0096. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Comparison and Validation of Long-Term Bleeding Events for Academic Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) Criteria and Contemporary Risk Scores for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Second-Generation Drug Eluting Stent.比较和验证第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的学术出血风险(ARC-HBR)标准和当代风险评分的长期出血事件。
Circ J. 2022 Aug 25;86(9):1379-1387. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0901. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
5
10-Year Trends of Antithrombotic Therapy Status and Outcomes in Japanese Atrial Fibrillation Patients - The Fushimi AF Registry.日本心房颤动患者抗栓治疗状况及结局的10年趋势——伏见心房颤动登记研究
Circ J. 2022 Mar 25;86(4):726-736. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0023. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
6
JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2020年心律失常药物治疗指南》
Circ J. 2022 Oct 25;86(11):1790-1924. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1212. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Midterm Outcomes Between Drug-Coated Balloons and Drug-Eluting Stents for Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.药物涂层球囊与药物洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者中期结局的倾向评分匹配比较。
Int Heart J. 2022 Mar 30;63(2):217-225. doi: 10.1536/ihj.21-576. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Very Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at High Bleeding Risk - The Fushimi AF Registry.高出血风险的高龄房颤患者的临床特征与转归——伏见房颤注册研究
Circ Rep. 2021 Oct 16;3(11):629-638. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0121. eCollection 2021 Nov 10.
9
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer vs. Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis.生物可降解聚合物与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架植入终末期肾病透析患者的两年临床结局
Circ Rep. 2020 Dec 15;3(1):18-25. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-20-0120.
10
Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics.日本心血管介入治疗学会旋磨术临床专家共识文件
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00715-w. Epub 2020 Oct 20.