Greenhouse Inbal, Babushkin Frida, Finn Talya, Shimoni Zvi, Aliman Moran, Ben-Ami Ronen, Cohen Regev
Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Infectious diseases unit, Sanz Medical Center, Laniado hospital, Netanya, Israel.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;89(3):222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of different antimicrobial treatment options for upper urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae.
We retrospectively analyzed patients with a first episode of febrile UTI and positive urine culture with ESBL-producing E. coli or K. pneumoniae during 2012-2015. We compared outcomes among patients who received: (1) definitive treatment with a carbapenem (CP), (2) a microbiologically appropriate intravenous non-carbapenem agent (NCA), (3) a non-appropriate antimicrobial (NAA), and (4) an intravenous NAA followed by an oral NCA (NAA-PO).
The majority of patients received empirical therapy with NAA (165/178, 93%), and definitive treatment with NCA (n=43), NAA (n=50), and NAA-PO (n=59). The NCA group had significantly higher SIRS score than the NAA-PO group (2.18 versus 1.76, P=0.018), but no differences were found between the NCA and NAA groups (2.18 and 1.92, P=0.15). Clinical cure at discharge from the index hospitalization was high (97-100%) in all 3 groups. The NCA group had longer length of stay as compared with the NAA-PO and NAA groups (8.7days versus 5.39 and 5.24days, P<0.0001) and a lower rate of early (48-72h) improvement (79% versus 96-100%, P=0.0002). Among re-admitted patients, re-admission with ESBL-related bloodstream infection was significantly higher in the NAA group as compared to the NAA-PO and NCA groups (33% versus 4% and 0%, respectively, P=0.02). Death rate within 60days was also higher in the NAA and NCA groups as compared with the NAA-PO group (P=0.048).
Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy for febrile non-bacteremic UTI with ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, but also with a long-term risk of relapsed bacteremic UTI. Definitive treatment with appropriate carbapenem-sparing antimicrobial agents effectively prevents late relapses.
评估针对产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)肠杆菌科细菌引起的上尿路感染(UTI),不同抗菌治疗方案的短期和长期疗效。
我们回顾性分析了2012年至2015年间首次发生发热性UTI且尿培养为产ESBL大肠杆菌或肺炎克雷伯菌阳性的患者。我们比较了接受以下治疗的患者的疗效:(1)碳青霉烯类(CP)进行确定性治疗,(2)微生物学上合适的静脉用非碳青霉烯类药物(NCA),(3)不合适的抗菌药物(NAA),以及(4)静脉用NAA后口服NCA(NAA-PO)。
大多数患者接受了NAA经验性治疗(165/178,93%),以及NCA(n = 43)、NAA(n = 50)和NAA-PO(n = 59)的确定性治疗。NCA组的全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)评分显著高于NAA-PO组(2.18对1.76,P = 0.018),但NCA组和NAA组之间无差异(2.18和1.92,P = 0.15)。所有3组患者在首次住院出院时的临床治愈率都很高(97 - 100%)。与NAA-PO组和NAA组相比,NCA组的住院时间更长(8.7天对5.39天和5.24天,P < 0.0001),早期(48 - 72小时)改善率更低(79%对96 - 100%,P = 0.0002)。在再次入院的患者中,NAA组因ESBL相关血流感染再次入院的比例显著高于NAA-PO组和NCA组(分别为33%对4%和0%,P = 0.02)。NAA组和NCA组60天内的死亡率也高于NAA-PO组(P = 0.048)。
对于产ESBL肠杆菌科细菌引起的发热性非菌血症性UTI,不恰当的抗菌治疗虽短期疗效良好,但存在复发性菌血症性UTI的长期风险。使用合适的碳青霉烯类替代抗菌药物进行确定性治疗可有效预防晚期复发。