Division of Cardiology, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University Hamilton Health Sciences, East Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Cardiology, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Oct;33(10):1245-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is purported to reduce the risk of radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial cardiac catheterization. However, the efficacy and optimal dose remain unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of UFH in this context.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Registry were searched from 1948-May 2017. Studies investigating UFH for reducing RAO in transradial coronary catheterization were included. Data were combined using a random-effects model.
Of 220 citations, 8 studies (6 randomized, 2 nonrandomized; 2937 patients) were included. Two studies comparing UFH and no UFH (n = 778) found no significant benefit of UFH in reducing RAO (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-4.67; P = 0.34; I = 97%). Studies comparing higher-dose (5000 IU) and lower-dose (2,000-3,000 IU) UFH (n = 2475) found a reduction in RAO with higher-dose UFH but significant heterogeneity was demonstrated (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64; P = 0.003; I = 82%). These studies were stratified by study method: for nonrandomized studies (n = 411), a lower rate of RAO was observed with no heterogeneity (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.28; P < 0.001; I = 0%); for randomized studies (n = 2064), a borderline significant reduction was also noted, but significant heterogeneity was demonstrated (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.99; P = 0.05; I = 84%). There was a trend toward more bleeding events with high-dose UFH (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.93-3.29; P = 0.08; I, 0%).
Observational studies suggest a benefit of higher-dose vs lower-dose UFH in reducing RAO. However, this is less clear in randomized trials. Adequately powered randomized studies are required to determine the role of UFH in preventing RAO in transradial cardiac catheterization.
普通肝素(UFH)据称可降低经桡动脉心导管术后桡动脉闭塞(RAO)的风险。然而,其疗效和最佳剂量仍不清楚。本荟萃分析评估了 UFH 在这种情况下的安全性和疗效。
从 1948 年 5 月至 2017 年 5 月,检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、ISI Web of Science 和 Cochrane 注册中心。纳入了研究 UFH 降低经桡动脉冠状动脉导管术 RAO 风险的研究。使用随机效应模型合并数据。
在 220 条引文中有 8 项研究(6 项随机,2 项非随机;2937 例患者)被纳入。两项比较 UFH 和无 UFH 的研究(n=778)发现 UFH 在降低 RAO 方面没有显著获益(比值比[OR],0.24;95%置信区间[CI],0.01-4.67;P=0.34;I=97%)。比较高剂量(5000 IU)和低剂量(2000-3000 IU)UFH 的研究(n=2475)发现高剂量 UFH 可降低 RAO,但显示出显著的异质性(OR,0.28;95%CI,0.12-0.64;P=0.003;I=82%)。这些研究按研究方法分层:非随机研究(n=411)观察到 RAO 发生率较低且无异质性(OR,0.14;95%CI,0.07-0.28;P<0.001;I=0%);随机研究(n=2064)也观察到边缘显著降低,但显示出显著的异质性(OR,0.37;95%CI,0.14-0.99;P=0.05;I=84%)。高剂量 UFH 出血事件的趋势增加(OR,1.75;95%CI,0.93-3.29;P=0.08;I,0%)。
观察性研究表明,高剂量与低剂量 UFH 相比,可降低 RAO。然而,随机试验的结果不太明确。需要进行充分的随机试验来确定 UFH 在预防经桡动脉心脏导管术 RAO 中的作用。