Darmency-Stamboul V, Cordier A G, Chabrier S
CHU Dijon, service de pédiatrie, Hôpital d'enfants, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, Dijon, 21029 France.
AP-Hp département de gynécologie-obstétrique et de médecine de la reproduction, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, Clamart, 92140 France.
Arch Pediatr. 2017 Sep;24(9S):9S3-9S11. doi: 10.1016/S0929-693X(17)30325-1.
The general designation ischemic perinatal stroke includes several disease states that differ in pathophysiology, timing of occurrence and presentation. While it seems logical to assume that their prevalence and their risk factors depend primarily on the considered type of stroke, most studies used inconsistent definitions or included heterogeneous populations, which limits their accuracy. Given these biases, the French Society of Neonatology and the French Centre for Paediatric Stroke wished to update the knowledge in this domain, focusing on a specific form of perinatal stroke, i.e neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) in term or near term newborns. A comprehensive analysis of published epidemiological data was dedicated to the following issues: Is the prevalence of NAIS well defined from epidemiological studies? What are the best recognized risk factors and is it possible to delineate a maternal and fetal population at risk for this condition? On July 31, 2015 a total of four hospitalized-based and five population-based studies, and six case-control studies were found. The conclusions are the following: The prevalence of NAIS in term or near term newborns varies from 6 to 17/100,000 live births (level of evidence 2). NAIS represents a half of total ischemic perinatal strokes (i.e. including those with delayed presentation as well) and one fourth of perinatal strokes (i.e. including cerebral haemorrhage stroke as well). Four sets of risk factors are consistent across different studies (level of evidence 3): (1) male sex, (2) obstetrical determinants (first pregnancy, caesarean section), and two peripartum complications: (3) intrapartum hypoxia and (4) materno-fetal/neonatal infection. Bacterial meningitis, cardiac disorders/procedures and invasive care such as extra-corporeal circulation carry a risk of NAIS as well. A registry could help refining epidemiological descriptive data. It could also be used to develop etiological studies focusing on pathophysiological hypotheses derived from the identified aforementioned risk factors.
围产期缺血性卒中这一统称包括几种在病理生理学、发病时间和表现方面存在差异的疾病状态。虽然认为它们的患病率和危险因素主要取决于所考虑的卒中类型似乎合乎逻辑,但大多数研究使用的定义不一致或纳入了异质性人群,这限制了研究的准确性。鉴于这些偏差,法国新生儿学会和法国儿科卒中中心希望更新该领域的知识,重点关注围产期卒中的一种特定形式,即足月儿或近足月儿的新生儿动脉缺血性卒中(NAIS)。对已发表的流行病学数据进行了全面分析,以探讨以下问题:NAIS的患病率在流行病学研究中是否得到了明确界定?最公认的危险因素有哪些,是否有可能确定患这种疾病的母婴群体?2015年7月31日,共发现四项基于医院的研究、五项基于人群的研究以及六项病例对照研究。结论如下:足月儿或近足月儿中NAIS的患病率为每10万活产儿6至17例(证据级别为2)。NAIS占围产期缺血性卒中总数的一半(即包括那些表现延迟的病例),占围产期卒中总数的四分之一(即包括脑出血性卒中)。四组危险因素在不同研究中是一致的(证据级别为3):(1)男性,(2)产科因素(初孕、剖宫产),以及两种围产期并发症:(3)产时缺氧和(4)母婴/新生儿感染。细菌性脑膜炎、心脏疾病/手术以及体外循环等侵入性治疗也有发生NAIS的风险。建立一个登记系统有助于完善流行病学描述性数据。它还可用于开展病因学研究,重点关注从上述已确定的危险因素推导出来的病理生理假设。