Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤成人有氧运动强度主观测量的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。

Reliability and Validity of Subjective Measures of Aerobic Intensity in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

出版信息

PM R. 2018 Feb;10(2):194-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.08.440. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically synthesize and appraise research regarding test-retest reliability or criterion validity of subjective measures for assessing aerobic exercise intensity in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, and CINAHL) were searched from inception to January 1, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies involving at least 50% of participants with SCI who performed an aerobic exercise test that included measurement of subjective and objective intensity based on test-retest reliability or criterion validity protocols.

DATA EXTRACTION

Characteristics were extracted on study design, measures, participants, protocols, and results. Each study was evaluated for risk of bias based on strength of the study design and a quality checklist score (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments [COSMIN]).

DATA SYNTHESIS

The 7 eligible studies (1 for reliability, 6 for validity) evaluated overall, peripheral and/or central ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale of 6-20 (RPE 6-20). No eligible studies were identified for other subjective intensity measures. The evidence for reliability and validity were synthesized separately for each measure and were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Overall, very low GRADE confidence ratings were established for reliability and validity evidence generalizable to the entire population with SCI and various upper-body and lower-body modalities. There was low confidence for the evidence showing that overall RPE 6-20 has acceptable validity for adults with SCI and high fitness levels performing moderate to vigorous-intensity upper-body aerobic exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care professionals and scientists need to be aware of the very low to low confidence in the evidence, which currently prohibits a strong clinical recommendation for the use of subjective measures for assessing aerobic exercise intensity in adults with SCI. However, a tentative, conditional recommendation regarding overall RPE 6-20 seems applicable, depending on participants' fitness level as well as the exercise intensity and modality used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

摘要

目的

系统综合和评价评估成人脊髓损伤(SCI)有氧运动强度的主观测量的重测信度或标准效度的研究。

数据来源

从开始到 2016 年 1 月 1 日,电子数据库(Pubmed、PsychINFO、SPORTDiscus、EMBASE 和 CINAHL)进行了搜索。

研究选择

研究至少包括 50%的 SCI 参与者,这些参与者进行了有氧运动测试,该测试根据重测信度或标准效度方案测量了主观和客观强度。

数据提取

对研究设计、测量、参与者、方案和结果进行了特征提取。根据研究设计的强度和质量检查表评分(COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments [COSMIN]),对每项研究进行了偏倚风险评估。

数据综合

7 项合格研究(1 项用于可靠性,6 项用于有效性)总体评估、外周和/或中枢感知运动强度(RPE)的 6-20 量表(RPE 6-20)。没有为其他主观强度测量确定合格的研究。对每个测量的可靠性和有效性证据进行了分别综合,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)进行评估。总体而言,对于可推广到整个 SCI 人群和各种上半身和下半身模式的可靠性和有效性证据,GRADE 置信度评分非常低。对于 RPE 6-20 总体上具有可接受的有效性的证据,以及对于具有高健康水平的成年人进行中度到剧烈强度的上半身有氧运动的证据,信心水平较低。

结论

医疗保健专业人员和科学家需要意识到,目前证据的可信度非常低至低,这禁止了强烈的临床建议,即使用主观测量来评估 SCI 成人的有氧运动强度。然而,根据参与者的健康水平以及使用的运动强度和模式,对于 RPE 6-20 的总体情况,似乎可以提出一个暂定的、有条件的建议。

证据水平

无。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验