School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
PM R. 2018 Feb;10(2):194-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.08.440. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
To systematically synthesize and appraise research regarding test-retest reliability or criterion validity of subjective measures for assessing aerobic exercise intensity in adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychINFO, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, and CINAHL) were searched from inception to January 1, 2016.
Studies involving at least 50% of participants with SCI who performed an aerobic exercise test that included measurement of subjective and objective intensity based on test-retest reliability or criterion validity protocols.
Characteristics were extracted on study design, measures, participants, protocols, and results. Each study was evaluated for risk of bias based on strength of the study design and a quality checklist score (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments [COSMIN]).
The 7 eligible studies (1 for reliability, 6 for validity) evaluated overall, peripheral and/or central ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) on a scale of 6-20 (RPE 6-20). No eligible studies were identified for other subjective intensity measures. The evidence for reliability and validity were synthesized separately for each measure and were assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Overall, very low GRADE confidence ratings were established for reliability and validity evidence generalizable to the entire population with SCI and various upper-body and lower-body modalities. There was low confidence for the evidence showing that overall RPE 6-20 has acceptable validity for adults with SCI and high fitness levels performing moderate to vigorous-intensity upper-body aerobic exercise.
Health care professionals and scientists need to be aware of the very low to low confidence in the evidence, which currently prohibits a strong clinical recommendation for the use of subjective measures for assessing aerobic exercise intensity in adults with SCI. However, a tentative, conditional recommendation regarding overall RPE 6-20 seems applicable, depending on participants' fitness level as well as the exercise intensity and modality used.
NA.
系统综合和评价评估成人脊髓损伤(SCI)有氧运动强度的主观测量的重测信度或标准效度的研究。
从开始到 2016 年 1 月 1 日,电子数据库(Pubmed、PsychINFO、SPORTDiscus、EMBASE 和 CINAHL)进行了搜索。
研究至少包括 50%的 SCI 参与者,这些参与者进行了有氧运动测试,该测试根据重测信度或标准效度方案测量了主观和客观强度。
对研究设计、测量、参与者、方案和结果进行了特征提取。根据研究设计的强度和质量检查表评分(COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments [COSMIN]),对每项研究进行了偏倚风险评估。
7 项合格研究(1 项用于可靠性,6 项用于有效性)总体评估、外周和/或中枢感知运动强度(RPE)的 6-20 量表(RPE 6-20)。没有为其他主观强度测量确定合格的研究。对每个测量的可靠性和有效性证据进行了分别综合,并使用推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)进行评估。总体而言,对于可推广到整个 SCI 人群和各种上半身和下半身模式的可靠性和有效性证据,GRADE 置信度评分非常低。对于 RPE 6-20 总体上具有可接受的有效性的证据,以及对于具有高健康水平的成年人进行中度到剧烈强度的上半身有氧运动的证据,信心水平较低。
医疗保健专业人员和科学家需要意识到,目前证据的可信度非常低至低,这禁止了强烈的临床建议,即使用主观测量来评估 SCI 成人的有氧运动强度。然而,根据参与者的健康水平以及使用的运动强度和模式,对于 RPE 6-20 的总体情况,似乎可以提出一个暂定的、有条件的建议。
无。