• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉淀粉样变与非喉淀粉样变的临床特征

Clinical characteristics of laryngeal versus nonlaryngeal amyloidosis.

作者信息

Rudy Shannon F, Jeffery Caroline C, Damrose Edward J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A.

Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2018 Mar;128(3):670-674. doi: 10.1002/lary.26846. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1002/lary.26846
PMID:28868800
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Amyloidosis represents a heterogeneous group of disorders marked by abnormal protein formation and deposition. Laryngeal amyloidosis is rare and classically thought to remain isolated with little risk of systemic involvement or associated malignancy. This study sought to further characterize differences in clinical characteristics between patients with laryngeal and nonlaryngeal amyloidosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

The Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment was searched to identify patients with biopsy-confirmed laryngeal amyloidosis and patients with amyloidosis without laryngeal involvement on endoscopy. Mann-Whitney U and χ tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of 865 patients treated for amyloidosis between 1996 and 2016, 22 (2.5%) patients with biopsy-proven laryngeal amyloidosis were identified. An additional 22 patients with amyloidosis of a different organ and negative laryngoscopy-and therefore without laryngeal amyloidosis-were identified as controls. Compared to these controls with nonlaryngeal amyloidosis, patients with laryngeal amyloidosis were younger (mean age 52.8 years vs. 68.4 years, P < .0006), and 18% had additional organ involvement. Immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis was the most common subtype in both groups of patients. Eighty-six percent of patients with laryngeal amyloidosis required surgical excision, and of these patients, over 30% required multiple excisions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant rate (18%) of multiorgan involvement in patients with laryngeal amyloidosis, which contradicts conventional concepts that this is an isolated disorder. This finding could have a significant impact on the evaluation and management of patients with laryngeal amyloidosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b. Laryngoscope, 128:670-674, 2018.

摘要

目的/假设:淀粉样变性是一组异质性疾病,其特征为异常蛋白质的形成和沉积。喉淀粉样变性较为罕见,传统观点认为其通常局限于局部,很少有全身受累或伴发恶性肿瘤的风险。本研究旨在进一步明确喉淀粉样变性患者与非喉淀粉样变性患者临床特征的差异。

研究设计

回顾性病例对照研究。

方法

检索斯坦福转化研究综合数据库环境,以识别经活检证实的喉淀粉样变性患者以及内镜检查显示无喉受累的淀粉样变性患者。采用曼-惠特尼U检验和χ检验进行统计分析。

结果

在1996年至2016年间接受淀粉样变性治疗的865例患者中,确定了22例(2.5%)经活检证实的喉淀粉样变性患者。另外确定了22例不同器官淀粉样变性且喉镜检查阴性(即无喉淀粉样变性)的患者作为对照。与这些非喉淀粉样变性对照患者相比,喉淀粉样变性患者更年轻(平均年龄52.8岁对68.4岁,P <.0006),且18%有其他器官受累。免疫球蛋白轻链淀粉样变性是两组患者中最常见的亚型。86%的喉淀粉样变性患者需要手术切除,其中超过30%的患者需要多次切除。

结论

喉淀粉样变性患者存在多器官受累的显著比例(18%),这与该疾病为局限性疾病的传统观念相矛盾。这一发现可能对喉淀粉样变性患者的评估和管理产生重大影响。

证据水平

3b。《喉镜》,2018年,第128卷,第670 - 674页。

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics of laryngeal versus nonlaryngeal amyloidosis.喉淀粉样变与非喉淀粉样变的临床特征
Laryngoscope. 2018 Mar;128(3):670-674. doi: 10.1002/lary.26846. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
How to deal with laryngeal amyloidosis? Experience based on 16 cases.如何处理喉淀粉样变?基于 16 例的经验。
Amyloid. 2012 Dec;19(4):177-81. doi: 10.3109/13506129.2012.723073. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
3
[Laryngeal amyloidosis].[喉淀粉样变性]
An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am. 1989;16(6):587-94.
4
[2 cases of laryngeal amyloidosis].[2例喉淀粉样变性]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1991 May-Jun;42(3):198-200.
5
Two cases of primary laryngeal amyloidosis.两例原发性喉淀粉样变性。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Nov;59(11):789-91.
6
[Laryngeal amyloidosis: a clinical case and review of literature].[喉淀粉样变性:一例临床病例及文献综述]
Rev Med Suisse. 2015 Sep 30;11(488):1796, 1798-1802.
7
Primary localised laryngeal amyloidosis.原发性局限性喉淀粉样变性
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Mar;63(3):385-6.
8
Laryngeal amyloidosis: localized versus systemic disease and update on diagnosis and therapy.喉淀粉样变性:局限性与全身性疾病及诊断和治疗的最新进展
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004 Sep;113(9):741-8. doi: 10.1177/000348940411300913.
9
[A case report of amyloidosis of the larynx in a 13-year-old girl].[一名13岁女孩喉淀粉样变性病例报告]
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2019;84(4):48-50. doi: 10.17116/otorino20198404148.
10
Laryngeal presentation of systemic apolipoprotein A-I-derived amyloidosis.系统性载脂蛋白A-I衍生淀粉样变性的喉部表现
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):608-15. doi: 10.1002/lary.20106.

引用本文的文献

1
Localized laryngeal amyloidosis: an unusual diagnosis in pediatric patients. Case report.局限性喉淀粉样变性:儿科患者的罕见诊断。病例报告。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09444-3.
2
Surgical treatment of laryngeal amyloidosis: a systematic review.手术治疗喉淀粉样变:系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jul;280(7):3065-3074. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07881-6. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
Clinical Profile of Patients with Head and Neck Amyloidosis: A Single-Institution Retrospective Chart Review.
头颈部淀粉样变性患者的临床概况:单机构回顾性病历审查
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;24(4):e450-e456. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402494. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
A radiologic review of hoarse voice from anatomic and neurologic perspectives.从解剖学和神经学角度对声音嘶哑进行的影像学综述。
Insights Imaging. 2019 Nov 18;10(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0786-7.
5
Multifocal head and neck amyloidosis as a diagnostic clue of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A case report.多灶性头颈部淀粉样变性作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断线索:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(35):e16830. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016830.
6
Amyloidosis of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract: Management of a Rare Disease and Review of the Literature.上呼吸道淀粉样变性:一种罕见疾病的治疗管理及文献复习。
Dysphagia. 2019 Apr;34(2):179-191. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9956-x. Epub 2018 Oct 31.