• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理幸福感的三分模型的结构和判别有效性:与大五特质的不同关系。

Structural and discriminant validity of the tripartite model of mental well-being: differential relationships with the big five traits.

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Keimyung University , Daegu , South Korea.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2019 Apr;28(2):168-174. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1370633. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1080/09638237.2017.1370633
PMID:28868947
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The tripartite model of mental well-being offers a comprehensive account of the nature of mental well-being. According to this model, mental well-being is composed of three distinct yet related dimensions of subjective (hedonic), psychological and social well-being.

AIMS

The present study investigated the structural and discriminant validity of the three well-being factors.

METHODS

A large American sample (N = 2732) was used. Data were analyzed using both Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM).

RESULTS

It was found that the well-being variables loaded on three separate factors, indicating that the tripartite model was consistent with the data. Discriminant validity was further evidenced by moderate correlations between the latent factors, and differential relationships with the Big Five personality traits. ESEM proved to be a more appropriate approach for analyzing the data given the presence of cross-loadings.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support adequate structural and discriminant validity for the dimensions of the tripartite model.

摘要

背景

心理幸福感的三分模型提供了对心理幸福感本质的全面描述。根据这一模型,心理幸福感由主观(享乐)、心理和社会幸福感三个不同但相关的维度组成。

目的

本研究旨在调查三个幸福感因素的结构和判别效度。

方法

采用美国大样本(N=2732)。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程建模(ESEM)对数据进行了分析。

结果

结果发现,幸福感变量在三个独立的因素上有负荷,表明三分模型与数据一致。潜在因素之间的中度相关以及与大五人格特质的不同关系进一步证明了判别效度。鉴于存在交叉负荷,ESEM 被证明是分析数据的更合适方法。

结论

这些结果支持三分模型维度的充分结构和判别效度。

相似文献

1
Structural and discriminant validity of the tripartite model of mental well-being: differential relationships with the big five traits.心理幸福感的三分模型的结构和判别有效性:与大五特质的不同关系。
J Ment Health. 2019 Apr;28(2):168-174. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1370633. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
2
Exploratory structural equation modeling of personality data.人格数据的探索性结构方程建模
Assessment. 2014 Jun;21(3):260-71. doi: 10.1177/1073191114528029. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
3
The factor structure of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: an evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling.塞尔维亚心理健康连续体-短式问卷(MHC-SF)的因子结构:使用探索性结构方程模型进行评估。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):510-515. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1222058. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
4
The Chronic Time Pressure Inventory: further assessment of factorial structure and validity.慢性时间压力量表:进一步评估因子结构和有效性。
PeerJ. 2024 May 1;12:e17373. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17373. eCollection 2024.
5
Factor Structure of Subjective Well-Being in Iran.伊朗主观幸福感的因素结构
J Pers Assess. 2016 Jul-Aug;98(4):435-43. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1117473. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
6
Validation of the Flourishing Scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being.验证在心理幸福感水平欠佳的人群样本中使用幸福度量表的有效性。
BMC Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;4:12. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5.
7
A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.通过探索性结构方程建模重新审视大五因素结构。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):471-91. doi: 10.1037/a0019227.
8
Triarchic Psychopathy Measure: Validity in Relation to Normal-Range Traits, Personality Pathology, and Psychological Adjustment.三元心理变态量表:与正常范围特质、人格病理学及心理调适的相关性效度
J Pers Disord. 2016 Feb;30(1):71-81. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_182.
9
Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects.大五因素在整个生命周期中的测量不变性:性别、年龄、可塑性、成熟度和甜蜜生活效应的 ESEM 检验。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jun;49(6):1194-1218. doi: 10.1037/a0026913. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
10
Stability and well-being: Associations among the Big Five domains, metatraits, and three kinds of well-being in a large sample.稳定性和幸福感:大五领域、元特质和三种幸福感在大样本中的关联。
J Pers. 2021 Aug;89(4):720-737. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12611. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Traits and Annual Income Determine the Willingness to Pay for a Single Tooth Implant.人格特质和年收入决定了单颗牙种植的支付意愿。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;9(8):952. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9080952.
2
Patterns of cumulative continuity and maturity in personality and well-being: Evidence from a large longitudinal sample of adults.人格与幸福感的累积连续性和成熟模式:来自大量成年人纵向样本的证据。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 1;169. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109737. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
3
Stability and well-being: Associations among the Big Five domains, metatraits, and three kinds of well-being in a large sample.
稳定性和幸福感:大五领域、元特质和三种幸福感在大样本中的关联。
J Pers. 2021 Aug;89(4):720-737. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12611. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
A multidimensional understanding of prosperity and well-being at country level: Data-driven explorations.国家层面繁荣和福祉的多维理解:基于数据的探索。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 9;14(10):e0223221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223221. eCollection 2019.
5
Directionality of the relationship between social well-being and subjective well-being: evidence from a 20-year longitudinal study.社会幸福感与主观幸福感之间关系的方向性:一项长达 20 年的纵向研究证据。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2137-2145. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1865-9. Epub 2018 Apr 30.