Fombonne E, Peron-Magnan P, Fuhrer R, Simon P
Neuropsychobiology. 1986;16(4):186-92. doi: 10.1159/000118324.
In order to compare the level of agreement between four evaluation criteria, data from an 18-month clinical trial with 181 schizophrenic patients were reanalyzed. In that study, assessments of the subjects were carried out with two psychiatric rating scales, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (BPRS and NOSIE), and two clinical evaluations (psychiatrist and nurse). Results show that there was total agreement on the four outcome measures for only half of the subjects. After further analyses, we observed that the best agreement was between the two clinical assessments. The NOSIE had poor agreement with the other criteria and appeared less sensitive to moderate levels of improvement in the patients' clinical status. These results are discussed with respect to reliability and validity issues.
为了比较四种评估标准之间的一致性水平,对一项针对181名精神分裂症患者的为期18个月的临床试验数据进行了重新分析。在该研究中,使用两种精神科评定量表,即简明精神状态评定量表(BPRS)和住院患者护士观察量表(NOSIE)以及两项临床评估(精神科医生和护士)对受试者进行评估。结果显示,只有一半的受试者在四项结果指标上完全一致。经过进一步分析,我们观察到两种临床评估之间的一致性最佳。NOSIE与其他标准的一致性较差,并且对患者临床状态的中度改善不太敏感。针对可靠性和有效性问题对这些结果进行了讨论。