ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Australia.
Cognition. 2017 Dec;169:102-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 3.
It remains controversial whether culture modulates eye movement behavior in face recognition. Inconsistent results have been reported regarding whether cultural differences in eye movement patterns exist, whether these differences affect recognition performance, and whether participants use similar eye movement patterns when viewing faces from different ethnicities. These inconsistencies may be due to substantial individual differences in eye movement patterns within a cultural group. Here we addressed this issue by conducting individual-level eye movement data analysis using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Each individual's eye movements were modeled with an HMM. We clustered the individual HMMs according to their similarities and discovered three common patterns in both Asian and Caucasian participants: holistic (looking mostly at the face center), left-eye-biased analytic (looking mostly at the two individual eyes in addition to the face center with a slight bias to the left eye), and right-eye-based analytic (looking mostly at the right eye in addition to the face center). The frequency of participants adopting the three patterns did not differ significantly between Asians and Caucasians, suggesting little modulation from culture. Significantly more participants (75%) showed similar eye movement patterns when viewing own- and other-race faces than different patterns. Most importantly, participants with left-eye-biased analytic patterns performed significantly better than those using either holistic or right-eye-biased analytic patterns. These results suggest that active retrieval of facial feature information through an analytic eye movement pattern may be optimal for face recognition regardless of culture.
文化是否调节人脸识别中的眼球运动行为仍存在争议。关于是否存在文化间眼球运动模式的差异、这些差异是否影响识别性能以及当参与者观看来自不同种族的面孔时是否使用相似的眼球运动模式,已有不一致的研究结果。这些不一致可能是由于文化群体中眼球运动模式存在大量个体差异。在这里,我们使用隐马尔可夫模型(HMMs)进行个体水平的眼球运动数据分析来解决这个问题。每个个体的眼球运动都用 HMM 进行建模。我们根据个体 HMM 的相似性对其进行聚类,并在亚洲和高加索参与者中发现了三种常见模式:整体(主要看脸的中心)、左眼偏向分析(除了脸的中心外,主要看两个眼睛,左眼稍有偏向)和右眼偏向分析(除了脸的中心外,主要看右眼)。亚洲人和高加索人采用这三种模式的频率没有显著差异,表明文化的调节作用很小。当观看自己种族和其他种族的面孔时,表现出相似眼球运动模式的参与者明显多于表现出不同模式的参与者。最重要的是,采用左眼偏向分析模式的参与者的表现明显优于采用整体或右眼偏向分析模式的参与者。这些结果表明,无论文化如何,通过分析性眼球运动模式主动检索面部特征信息可能是识别面孔的最佳方式。