• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟会诊中模仿非言语情感表达与共情发展:一项实验性可行性研究。

Mimicking non-verbal emotional expressions and empathy development in simulated consultations: An experimental feasibility study.

作者信息

Zhou Yuefang, Fischer Martin H

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.016
PMID:28870442
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility of applying an experimental design to study the relationship between non-verbal emotions and empathy development in simulated consultations.

METHOD

In video-recorded simulated consultations, twenty clinicians were randomly allocated to either an experimental group (instructed to mimic non-verbal emotions of a simulated patient, SP) or a control group (no such instruction). Baseline empathy scores were obtained before consultation, relational empathy was rated by SP after consultation. Multilevel logistic regression modelled the probability of mimicry occurrence, controlling for baseline empathy and clinical experience. ANCOVA compared group differences on relational empathy and consultation smoothness.

RESULTS

Instructed mimicry lasted longer than spontaneous mimicry. Mimicry was marginally related to improved relational empathy. SP felt being treated more like a whole person during consultations with spontaneous mimicry. Clinicians who displayed spontaneous mimicry felt consultations went more smoothly.

CONCLUSION

The experimental approach improved our understanding of how non-verbal emotional mimicry contributed to relational empathy development during consultations. Further work should ascertain the potential of instructed mimicry to enhance empathy development.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Understanding how non-verbal emotional mimicry impacts on patients' perceived clinician empathy during consultations may inform training and intervention programme development.

摘要

目的

探讨运用实验设计来研究模拟会诊中非言语情绪与共情发展之间关系的可行性。

方法

在视频记录的模拟会诊中,20名临床医生被随机分配到实验组(被指示模仿模拟患者的非言语情绪)或对照组(无此指示)。会诊前获取基线共情得分,会诊后由模拟患者对关系性共情进行评分。多水平逻辑回归模型模拟模仿发生的概率,同时控制基线共情和临床经验。协方差分析比较两组在关系性共情和会诊流畅性方面的差异。

结果

被指示的模仿持续时间长于自发模仿。模仿与关系性共情的改善略有相关。在与自发模仿的临床医生会诊时,模拟患者感觉自己更被当作一个完整的人对待。表现出自发模仿的临床医生感觉会诊进行得更顺利。

结论

实验方法增进了我们对非言语情绪模仿如何在会诊中促进关系性共情发展的理解。进一步的研究应确定被指示模仿在增强共情发展方面的潜力。

实践意义

了解非言语情绪模仿在会诊期间如何影响患者感知到的临床医生共情,可能为培训和干预项目的开发提供参考。

相似文献

1
Mimicking non-verbal emotional expressions and empathy development in simulated consultations: An experimental feasibility study.模拟会诊中模仿非言语情感表达与共情发展:一项实验性可行性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):304-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
General Practitioners' Empathy and Health Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study of Consultations in Areas of High and Low Deprivation.全科医生的同理心与健康结果:高贫困和低贫困地区就诊的前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar;14(2):117-24. doi: 10.1370/afm.1910.
3
When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret.癌症患者何时会后悔他们的治疗决定?一项关于临床医生沟通方式及决策风格匹配对决策后悔影响的路径分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
4
Differences between GP perception of delivered empathy and patient-perceived empathy: a cross-sectional study in primary care.全科医生感知的同理心与患者感知的同理心之间的差异:初级保健中的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Sep;68(674):e621-e626. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X698381. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Facial Mimicry and Doctor-Patient Satisfaction: The Feasibility of Artificial Empathy in a Clinical Video Data.面部模仿与医患满意度:临床视频数据中人工同理心的可行性。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:1116-1120. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231138.
6
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.屏幕对屏幕咨询与面对面咨询对医患沟通的影响:一项针对模拟患者的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033.
7
EQClinic: a platform for learning communication skills in clinical consultations.情商诊所:一个用于在临床会诊中学习沟通技巧的平台。
Med Educ Online. 2016 Jul 29;21:31801. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31801. eCollection 2016.
8
Patient-rated physician empathy and patient satisfaction during pain clinic consultations.患者评估的医师同理心与疼痛诊疗咨询中的患者满意度。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Nov;188(4):1379-1384. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-01999-5. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
9
Training residents in patient-centred communication and empathy: evaluation from patients, observers and residents.培训住院医师以进行以患者为中心的沟通和同理心:来自患者、观察者和住院医师的评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 2;19(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1555-5.
10
Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice.《咨询与关系同理心(CARE)量表》在全科医疗中的相关性及实际应用
Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh730. Epub 2005 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating nonverbal cues for assessing physician empathy in telemedicine: a Delphi study.验证用于评估远程医疗中医生同理心的非语言线索:一项德尔菲研究。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2497328. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2497328. Epub 2025 May 8.
2
The chameleon effect in customer relationship management: Experiments on the spillover effects of mimicry in natural settings of a chain hotel and a chain grocery shop.客户关系管理中的变色龙效应:连锁酒店和连锁杂货店自然场景下模仿溢出效应的实验
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1016125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1016125. eCollection 2023.
3
Infant Emotional Mimicry of Strangers: Associations with Parent Emotional Mimicry, Parent-Infant Mutual Attention, and Parent Dispositional Affective Empathy.
婴儿对陌生人的情绪模仿:与父母情绪模仿、父母与婴儿的相互注意以及父母的情绪同理心有关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 14;18(2):654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020654.