• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜下剥离术后追加手术切除治疗早期食管癌的疗效

Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

Kudou Michihiro, Shiozaki Atsushi, Fujiwara Hitoshi, Konishi Hirotaka, Shoda Katsutoshi, Arita Tomohiro, Kosuga Toshiyuki, Morimura Ryo, Murayama Yasutoshi, Kuriu Yoshiaki, Ikoma Hisashi, Kubota Takeshi, Nakanishi Masayoshi, Okamoto Kazuma, Dohi Osamu, Konishi Hideyuki, Naito Yuji, Otsuji Eigo

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2017 Sep;37(9):5301-5307. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11956.

DOI:10.21873/anticanres.11956
PMID:28870968
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of additional surgical resection (ASR) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for superficial esophageal cancer (SEC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological features and prognoses were analyzed in esophageal cancer (EC) cases with the indication for additional treatments (AT) after ESD (37 cases) and in cases that underwent primary resection (13 cases).

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 37 cases underwent ASR. The remaining 21 cases underwent other treatments or observation. Although all ASR cases are alive without recurrence, recurrence developed in 2 non-ASR cases. Residual tumors were detected in 2 ASR cases. All 4 cases were T1b and positive for lymph vessel invasion (ly+). No significant difference was observed in surgical outcomes between ASR and primary surgical resection (PSR) cases.

CONCLUSION

AT need to be considered for T1b and ly+ cases, and ASR is one of the effective AT. The safety of ASR was similar to PSR for SEC.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后追加手术切除(ASR)治疗早期食管癌(SEC)的疗效。

患者与方法

分析ESD后有追加治疗指征的食管癌(EC)患者(37例)以及接受初次切除的患者(13例)的临床病理特征和预后。

结果

37例患者中有16例行ASR。其余21例接受了其他治疗或观察。尽管所有行ASR的患者均存活且无复发,但2例未行ASR的患者出现了复发。2例行ASR的患者检测到残留肿瘤。所有4例均为T1b且淋巴管浸润阳性(ly+)。ASR与初次手术切除(PSR)病例的手术结果无显著差异。

结论

对于T1b和ly+病例,需要考虑追加治疗,ASR是有效的追加治疗方法之一。ASR对SEC的安全性与PSR相似。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Additional Surgical Resection After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer.内镜黏膜下剥离术后追加手术切除治疗早期食管癌的疗效
Anticancer Res. 2017 Sep;37(9):5301-5307. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11956.
2
Endoscopic submucosal dissection followed by chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer: choice of new approach.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合放化疗治疗早期食管癌:新方法的选择。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Dec 14;13(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1195-7.
3
Additional radiotherapy following endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1a-MM/T1b-SM esophageal squamous cell carcinoma improves locoregional control.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗 T1a-MM/T1b-SM 食管鳞癌后加量放疗可提高局部区域控制率。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan 29;13(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0960-y.
4
Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Real-World Cohort.内镜黏膜下剥离术与食管切除术治疗 T1 期食管鳞癌的真实世界队列研究结果。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):73-81.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
5
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes in T1B esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗 T1B 期食管鳞癌的疗效评价:一项回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2817-2825. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10824-9. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
6
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗表浅性食管鳞状细胞癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Oct;88(4):624-633. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2360. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
A phase II study of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms (KDOG 0901).内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管浅表性肿瘤的 II 期研究(KDOG0901)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov;78(5):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.182. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Predictors of technical difficulty during endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer.预测早期食管癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的技术难度。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2909-2915. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6591-4. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Predictive factors for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管癌后食管狭窄的预测因素。
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(7):626-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00954.x. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
10
Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma.内镜下黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌的评估
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Dec;10(6):343-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Additional chemoradiotherapy following endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.食管鳞状细胞癌患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术后的辅助放化疗:一项叙述性综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 16;15:1527634. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1527634. eCollection 2025.
2
Therapeutic strategies following endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1a-MM/T1b-SM1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparisons of long-term outcomes with propensity score-matched analysis.内镜下黏膜下剥离术后治疗T1a-MM/T1b-SM1期食管鳞状细胞癌的策略:倾向评分匹配分析的长期结果比较
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1761-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09683-z. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
3
A liquid biopsy signature predicts lymph node metastases in T1 oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: implications for precision treatment strategy.
液体活检标志物可预测 T1 期食管鳞癌的淋巴结转移:对精准治疗策略的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Nov;127(11):2052-2059. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01997-y. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Author's Reply: Comparison of Outcomes Between Additional Esophagectomy After Noncurative Endoscopic Resection and Upfront Esophagectomy for T1N0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.作者回复:非根治性内镜切除术后追加食管切除术与T1N0期食管鳞状细胞癌直接行食管切除术的疗效比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(Suppl 3):839-840. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10104-z. Epub 2021 May 10.
5
Risk of metastatic recurrence after endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading into the muscularis mucosa or submucosa: a multicenter retrospective study.侵犯黏膜肌层或黏膜下层的食管鳞状细胞癌内镜切除术后发生远处转移复发的风险:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;56(7):620-632. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01787-y. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Prognostic risk factors associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multi-center cohort study.与接受内镜黏膜下剥离术的食管鳞状细胞癌患者相关的预后危险因素:一项多中心队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2279-2289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08502-1. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Comparison of Outcomes Between Additional Esophagectomy After Noncurative Endoscopic Resection and Upfront Esophagectomy for T1N0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.内镜下非治愈性切除术后追加食管切除术与 T1N0 食管鳞癌 upfront 食管切除术的结局比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;28(9):4859-4866. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09498-z. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and comparison to surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗早期食管鳞状细胞癌的长期疗效及与手术治疗的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 6;13:1756284820964316. doi: 10.1177/1756284820964316. eCollection 2020.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with tumor invasion to different depths.内镜下黏膜下剥离术与食管癌切除术治疗肿瘤侵犯不同深度的早期食管鳞状细胞癌的对比研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):2977-2992. eCollection 2020.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection followed by chemoradiotherapy for superficial esophageal cancer: choice of new approach.内镜黏膜下剥离术联合放化疗治疗早期食管癌:新方法的选择。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Dec 14;13(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1195-7.