Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e017629. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017629.
Overuse of cardiac catheterisation (CC) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is documented in Germany and other regions, although percutaneous coronary interventions do not provide a benefit over medical therapy for stable patients. Various studies investigated health system, physician and patient factors driving non-adherence to guidelines which recommend a stepwise approach with invasive procedures only in case of signs of ischaemia in non-invasive testing. In a larger-scale project, we aim to better understand the patients' perspective in order to develop an intervention that enhances patient's acceptance of this stepwise diagnostic approach for stable CAD. As a first step, this qualitative study aims to identify patient factors that prevent and promote the described overuse.
The exploratory qualitative interview study will include about 20 patients with stable CAD and a history of acute coronary syndrome from two German teaching practices. Narrative, structured interviews designed to last 30 to 90 min will be conducted. The interviews will be analysed using qualitative content analysis by Mayring. The analysis will address the following questions: (1) What are reasons for stable patients to undergo CC? (2) How do patients deal with their heart disease (secondary prevention)? (3) Which processes do patients describe regarding decision-making for non-invasive and invasive coronary procedures? (4) What information needs exist on behalf of patients to better understand the stepwise diagnostic approach outlined in guidelines and thereby avoid low-appropriate CCs? Based on these data, empirical typification will be conducted.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained. All participants will provide written informed consent. Data will be pseudonymised for analysis. The findings will contribute to the development of an appropriate intervention. Results will be disseminated by conference presentations and journal publications.
在德国和其他地区,有文件记录表明在稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中过度使用了心脏导管术(CC),尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对稳定型患者没有益处超过药物治疗。各种研究调查了驱动不符合指南建议的卫生系统、医生和患者因素,这些指南建议采用逐步方法,仅在非侵入性测试中存在缺血迹象的情况下才采用侵入性程序。在一个更大规模的项目中,我们旨在更好地了解患者的观点,以便开发一种干预措施,提高患者对稳定型 CAD 这种逐步诊断方法的接受程度。作为第一步,这项定性研究旨在确定预防和促进这种过度使用的患者因素。
这项探索性定性访谈研究将包括来自两家德国教学实践的约 20 名有稳定型 CAD 和急性冠状动脉综合征病史的患者。设计为持续 30 至 90 分钟的叙事、结构化访谈将进行。访谈将使用 Mayring 的定性内容分析进行分析。分析将解决以下问题:(1)稳定型患者进行 CC 的原因是什么?(2)患者如何应对他们的心脏病(二级预防)?(3)患者如何描述非侵入性和侵入性冠状动脉程序的决策过程?(4)患者需要哪些信息来更好地理解指南中概述的逐步诊断方法,从而避免低适当的 CC?基于这些数据,将进行实证分类。
该研究已获得伦理批准。所有参与者都将提供书面知情同意书。数据将匿名化进行分析。研究结果将有助于开发适当的干预措施。研究结果将通过会议演讲和期刊发表进行传播。