Singapore University of Technology and Design, 8 Somapah Road, Singapore, 487372, Singapore.
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 4;7(1):10388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09830-w.
Social interaction increases significantly the performance of a wide range of cooperative systems. However, evidence that natural swarms limit the number of interactions suggests potentially detrimental consequences of excessive interaction. Using a canonical model of collective motion, we find that the collective response to a dynamic localized perturbation-emulating a predator attack-is hindered when the number of interacting neighbors exceeds a certain threshold. Specifically, the effectiveness in avoiding the predator is enhanced by large integrated correlations, which are known to peak at a given level of interagent interaction. From the network-theoretic perspective, we uncover the same interplay between number of connections and effectiveness in group-level response for two distinct decision-making models of distributed consensus operating over a range of static networks. The effect of the number of connections on the collective response critically depends on the dynamics of the perturbation. While adding more connections improves the response to slow perturbations, the opposite is true for fast ones. These results have far-reaching implications for the design of artificial swarms or interaction networks.
社交互动显著提高了广泛的合作系统的性能。然而,自然群体限制相互作用数量的证据表明,过度的相互作用可能会带来不利的后果。使用一个典型的集体运动模型,我们发现当相互作用的邻居数量超过一定阈值时,对动态局部扰动(模拟捕食者攻击)的集体反应受到阻碍。具体来说,避免捕食者的有效性通过大的集成相关性来增强,已知这些相关性在给定的agents 相互作用水平上达到峰值。从网络理论的角度来看,我们在两种不同的分布式共识决策模型中发现了相同的连接数量与群体水平响应有效性之间的相互作用,这两种模型在一系列静态网络上运行。连接数量对集体响应的影响取决于扰动的动态。虽然增加更多的连接可以改善对缓慢扰动的响应,但对于快速扰动则相反。这些结果对于人工群体或交互网络的设计具有深远的意义。