• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无家可归者过渡到社区生活的关键时间干预:一项随机对照试验。

Critical Time Intervention for Homeless People Making the Transition to Community Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Impuls - Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Sep;60(1-2):175-186. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12150. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1002/ajcp.12150
PMID:28872196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5639358/
Abstract

To help create an evidence base in Europe for effective interventions that improve the well-being of homeless people, we tested whether critical time intervention (CTI), a time-limited intervention developed to support vulnerable people during times of transition, is effective outside the United States. For this multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 183 adults who were moving from shelters in the Netherlands to supported or independent housing were allocated to CTI or care-as-usual. The primary outcome was number of days rehoused, which was assessed by interviewing participants four times during a 9-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed with three-level mixed-effects models. The primary outcome did not differ between groups. CTI had a significant effect on family support and, for people experiencing less social support, psychological distress. Groups did not differ significantly on social support, fulfillment of care needs, quality of life, self-esteem, excessive alcohol use, or cannabis use. Because few participants were homeless at 9 months, more research is needed to establish whether CTI can prevent long-term recurrent homelessness. Given recent emphasis on informal support in public services and positive effects of CTI on family support and psychological distress, CTI is a fitting intervention for Dutch shelter services.

摘要

为了在欧洲建立一个有效的干预措施的证据基础,以改善无家可归者的福祉,我们测试了关键时期干预(CTI)是否在美国以外的地区有效。CTI 是一种限时干预措施,旨在为处于过渡时期的弱势群体提供支持。这项多中心、平行组随机对照试验纳入了 183 名即将从荷兰收容所搬至保障性或独立性住房的成年人,将他们随机分配至 CTI 组或常规护理组。主要结局是重新安置的天数,通过在 9 个月的随访期间对参与者进行 4 次访谈进行评估。采用三级混合效应模型进行分析。两组之间的主要结局没有差异。CTI 对家庭支持有显著影响,对于社会支持较少的人,CTI 对心理困扰也有显著影响。两组在社会支持、护理需求的满足、生活质量、自尊、过度饮酒或大麻使用方面没有显著差异。由于 9 个月时很少有参与者无家可归,因此需要进一步研究以确定 CTI 是否可以预防长期反复无家可归。鉴于最近公共服务部门对非正式支持的重视,以及 CTI 对家庭支持和心理困扰的积极影响,CTI 是荷兰收容所服务的一种合适的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef4/5639358/2591137b5988/AJCP-60-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef4/5639358/2591137b5988/AJCP-60-175-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef4/5639358/2591137b5988/AJCP-60-175-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Critical Time Intervention for Homeless People Making the Transition to Community Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.无家可归者过渡到社区生活的关键时间干预:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Sep;60(1-2):175-186. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12150. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
2
The effectiveness of critical time intervention for abused women and homeless people leaving Dutch shelters: study protocol of two randomised controlled trials.受虐妇女和离开荷兰收容所的无家可归者的关键时间干预的效果:两项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 6;13:555. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-555.
3
Differences between homeless women and men before and after the transition from shelter to community living: A longitudinal analysis. homeless 妇女和 men 在过渡到社区生活前后的差异:一项纵向分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):1193-1203. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12752. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
The effectiveness of critical time intervention for abused women leaving women's shelters: a randomized controlled trial.受虐妇女离开庇护所后接受关键时间干预的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Public Health. 2018 May;63(4):513-523. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1067-1. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
5
Effects of psychosocial and situational variables on substance abuse among homeless adults.心理社会和情境变量对无家可归成年人药物滥用的影响。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;22(3):410-6. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.410.
6
Effectiveness of a housing support team intervention with a recovery-oriented approach on hospital and emergency department use by homeless people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial.以康复为导向的住房支持团队干预对严重精神疾病 homeless 人群住院和急诊使用的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Sep 30;29:e169. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000785.
7
Long-term effects of rent supplements and mental health support services on housing and health outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness: extension study of the At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial.租金补贴和心理健康支持服务对患有精神疾病的无家可归成年人住房和健康状况的长期影响:“在家/在自己家”随机对照试验的扩展研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):915-925. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30371-2. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Substance use among Dutch homeless people, a follow-up study: prevalence, pattern and housing status.荷兰无家可归者的物质使用情况:一项随访研究——患病率、模式及住房状况
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):111-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv142. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Self-reported health, healthcare service use and health-related needs: A comparison of older and younger homeless people.自我报告的健康状况、医疗服务利用情况和与健康相关的需求:老年和年轻无家可归者的比较。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):e379-e388. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12739. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Are resilience and perceived stress related to social support and housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness?韧性和感知压力与无家可归的精神病成年人的社会支持和住房稳定有关吗?
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):1053-1062. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12722. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of abstinence-based and harm reduction-based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review.高收入国家中针对无家可归成年人减少问题性物质使用的基于禁欲和减少伤害干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析:一项系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 21;20(2):e1396. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1396. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Supporting Women Exit Sex Work: A Contribution Analysis of the Exit Doors Here Integrated Care Program in Toronto, Canada.支持女性脱离性工作:加拿大多伦多“此处综合护理项目”退出途径的贡献分析
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):22. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7700. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of critical time intervention for abused women leaving women's shelters: a randomized controlled trial.受虐妇女离开庇护所后接受关键时间干预的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Public Health. 2018 May;63(4):513-523. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-1067-1. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
2
Case Management Models in Permanent Supported Housing Programs for People With Complex Behavioral Issues Who Are Homeless.针对有复杂行为问题的无家可归者的永久性支持性住房项目中的个案管理模式。
J Dual Diagn. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):185-92. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2016.1176852. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
3
Critical Time Intervention for People Leaving Shelters in the Netherlands: Assessing Fidelity and Exploring Facilitators and Barriers.
Effectiveness of Interventions for Meaningful Activity Participation in Homelessness: A Systematic Review.干预措施对无家可归者有意义的活动参与的效果:系统评价。
Can J Occup Ther. 2024 Sep;91(3):256-271. doi: 10.1177/00084174241233519. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
4
Significance of fostering the mental health of patients with diabetes through critical time intervention.通过关键时期干预促进糖尿病患者心理健康的意义。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Dec 26;11(36):8486-8497. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i36.8486.
5
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2020 Oct 13;192(41):E1225-E1241. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190777-f.
7
Peer navigation for individuals with serious mental illness leaving jail: a pilot randomized trial study protocol.针对刚出狱的严重精神疾病患者的同伴导航:一项随机试验研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Aug 17;6:114. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00659-1. eCollection 2020.
8
The effectiveness of case management interventions for the homeless, vulnerably housed and persons with lived experience: A systematic review.案例管理干预对无家可归者、脆弱住房者和有生活经验者的效果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0230896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230896. eCollection 2020.
9
Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience.针对无家可归者、住房条件差的弱势群体以及有过无家可归经历者的临床指南。
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 9;192(10):E240-E254. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190777.
10
Differences between homeless women and men before and after the transition from shelter to community living: A longitudinal analysis. homeless 妇女和 men 在过渡到社区生活前后的差异:一项纵向分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):1193-1203. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12752. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
荷兰针对离开庇护所人员的关键时间干预:评估保真度并探索促进因素和障碍。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2017 Jan;44(1):67-80. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0699-9.
4
Longitudinal Impact of a Family Critical Time Intervention on Children in High-Risk Families Experiencing Homelessness: A Randomized Trial.家庭关键时期干预对经历无家可归的高危家庭儿童的纵向影响:一项随机试验。
Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Dec;56(3-4):205-16. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9742-y.
5
The effectiveness of critical time intervention for abused women and homeless people leaving Dutch shelters: study protocol of two randomised controlled trials.受虐妇女和离开荷兰收容所的无家可归者的关键时间干预的效果:两项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 6;13:555. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-555.
6
The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations.高收入国家无家可归者的健康:描述性流行病学、健康后果以及临床和政策建议。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 25;384(9953):1529-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61132-6.
7
Effectiveness of case management for homeless persons: a systematic review.案例管理对 homeless persons 的有效性:系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103(10):e13-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
8
Risk factors associated with recurrent homelessness after a first homeless episode.首次经历无家可归后与反复无家可归相关的风险因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 Jul;50(5):505-13. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9608-4. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
9
Fidelity to recovery-oriented ACT practices and consumer outcomes.对以康复为导向的接受与承诺疗法实践的坚持与消费者结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):318-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200097.
10
Strengths model case management fidelity scores and client outcomes.优势模型案例管理保真度评分和客户结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jul;63(7):708-10. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100373.