Suppr超能文献

无家可归者过渡到社区生活的关键时间干预:一项随机对照试验。

Critical Time Intervention for Homeless People Making the Transition to Community Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Impuls - Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Sep;60(1-2):175-186. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12150. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Abstract

To help create an evidence base in Europe for effective interventions that improve the well-being of homeless people, we tested whether critical time intervention (CTI), a time-limited intervention developed to support vulnerable people during times of transition, is effective outside the United States. For this multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 183 adults who were moving from shelters in the Netherlands to supported or independent housing were allocated to CTI or care-as-usual. The primary outcome was number of days rehoused, which was assessed by interviewing participants four times during a 9-month follow-up. Outcomes were analyzed with three-level mixed-effects models. The primary outcome did not differ between groups. CTI had a significant effect on family support and, for people experiencing less social support, psychological distress. Groups did not differ significantly on social support, fulfillment of care needs, quality of life, self-esteem, excessive alcohol use, or cannabis use. Because few participants were homeless at 9 months, more research is needed to establish whether CTI can prevent long-term recurrent homelessness. Given recent emphasis on informal support in public services and positive effects of CTI on family support and psychological distress, CTI is a fitting intervention for Dutch shelter services.

摘要

为了在欧洲建立一个有效的干预措施的证据基础,以改善无家可归者的福祉,我们测试了关键时期干预(CTI)是否在美国以外的地区有效。CTI 是一种限时干预措施,旨在为处于过渡时期的弱势群体提供支持。这项多中心、平行组随机对照试验纳入了 183 名即将从荷兰收容所搬至保障性或独立性住房的成年人,将他们随机分配至 CTI 组或常规护理组。主要结局是重新安置的天数,通过在 9 个月的随访期间对参与者进行 4 次访谈进行评估。采用三级混合效应模型进行分析。两组之间的主要结局没有差异。CTI 对家庭支持有显著影响,对于社会支持较少的人,CTI 对心理困扰也有显著影响。两组在社会支持、护理需求的满足、生活质量、自尊、过度饮酒或大麻使用方面没有显著差异。由于 9 个月时很少有参与者无家可归,因此需要进一步研究以确定 CTI 是否可以预防长期反复无家可归。鉴于最近公共服务部门对非正式支持的重视,以及 CTI 对家庭支持和心理困扰的积极影响,CTI 是荷兰收容所服务的一种合适的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fef4/5639358/2591137b5988/AJCP-60-175-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验