• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同铁制剂在缺铁性贫血预防中的比较

Comparison of Different Iron Preparations in the Prophylaxis of Iron-deficiency Anemia.

作者信息

Aydin Ali, Gur Emel, Erener-Ercan Tugba, Can Gunay, Arvas Ahmet

机构信息

Departments of *Pediatrics †Social Pediatrics §Public Health, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty ‡Department of Neonatology, Maltepe University, Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017 Oct;39(7):495-499. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000967.

DOI:10.1097/MPH.0000000000000967
PMID:28872486
Abstract

We compared the efficacy of ferrous sulfate (divalent) and ferric polymaltose (trivalent) compounds for the prophylaxis of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Study infants included exclusively breast milk-fed term infants. Subjects were divided randomly into 2 groups at 4 months of age and group 1 (n=56) received divalent and group 2 (n=56) received trivalent iron (Fe) preparation at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d for 5 months. At 9 months of age, after a 5-month prophylaxis, a significant increase was observed in hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit, serum Fe levels, and transferrin saturation in both groups. However, group 1 had significantly higher Hb, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, Fe, and transferrin saturation than group 2 (11.7±0.6 g/dL, 34.6%±1.7%, 76.2±2.9 fL, 55.5±1.8 mcg, 20.8±3.9 g/L, respectively in group 1 vs. 11.3±0.5 g/dL, 33.5%±1.5%, 74.7±3.2 fL, 42.5±1.8 mcg, 14.1±7.5 g/L, respectively in group 2). No significant difference was found in ferritin values between the groups. Fe deficiency was found in 17 (30.3%) of the subjects in group 1, and 23 (41%) of subjects in group 2 whereas 5 (8.9%) subjects had IDA in group 1 and 12 (12%) in group 2 which were insignificant between groups. No significant difference was found with regard to side effects between 2 Fe preparations. Although divalent Fe therapy led to a higher Hb and serum Fe level, both ferrous and ferric Fe preparations were effective for prophylactic use in the prevention of Fe deficiency and IDA with comparable side effects.

摘要

我们比较了硫酸亚铁(二价)和聚麦芽糖铁(三价)化合物预防缺铁性贫血(IDA)的疗效。研究对象包括纯母乳喂养的足月儿。在4月龄时将受试者随机分为2组,第1组(n = 56)接受二价铁制剂,第2组(n = 56)接受三价铁(Fe)制剂,剂量为2mg/kg/d,持续5个月。在9月龄时,经过5个月的预防治疗后,两组的血红蛋白(Hb)、血细胞比容、血清铁水平和转铁蛋白饱和度均显著升高。然而,第1组的Hb、血细胞比容、平均红细胞体积、铁和转铁蛋白饱和度显著高于第2组(第1组分别为11.7±0.6g/dL、34.6%±1.7%、76.2±2.9fL、55.5±1.8μg、20.8±3.9g/L,第2组分别为11.3±0.5g/dL、33.5%±1.5%、74.7±3.2fL、42.5±1.8μg、14.1±7.5g/L)。两组之间的铁蛋白值无显著差异。第1组17名(30.3%)受试者和第2组23名(41%)受试者存在缺铁,而第1组5名(8.9%)受试者和第2组12名(12%)受试者患有IDA,两组之间无显著差异。两种铁制剂在副作用方面无显著差异。虽然二价铁治疗导致更高的Hb和血清铁水平,但亚铁和铁制剂在预防铁缺乏和IDA方面均有效,且副作用相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Different Iron Preparations in the Prophylaxis of Iron-deficiency Anemia.不同铁制剂在缺铁性贫血预防中的比较
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017 Oct;39(7):495-499. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000967.
2
Iron polymaltose versus ferrous gluconate in the prevention of iron deficiency anemia of infancy.聚麦芽糖铁与葡萄糖酸亚铁预防婴儿缺铁性贫血的比较
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010 Nov;32(8):585-8. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181ec0f2c.
3
Efficacy and safety of oral iron(III) polymaltose complex versus ferrous sulfate in pregnant women with iron-deficiency anemia: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.口服聚麦芽糖铁复合物与硫酸亚铁治疗缺铁性贫血孕妇的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Nov;24(11):1347-52. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.599080. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
4
Effect of Low-Dose Ferrous Sulfate vs Iron Polysaccharide Complex on Hemoglobin Concentration in Young Children With Nutritional Iron-Deficiency Anemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低剂量硫酸亚铁与多糖铁复合物对营养性缺铁性贫血幼儿血红蛋白浓度的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Jun 13;317(22):2297-2304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6846.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Ferrous, Ferric and Liposomal Iron Preparations for Prophylaxis in Infants.铁剂、铁盐和脂质体铁制剂预防婴儿缺铁的疗效比较。
Indian Pediatr. 2024 Jul 15;61(7):621-626. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
Iron nutritional status is improved in Brazilian preterm infants fed food cooked in iron pots.在巴西,用铁锅烹饪食物喂养的早产婴儿铁营养状况得到改善。
J Nutr. 1998 May;128(5):855-9. doi: 10.1093/jn/128.5.855.
7
Effectiveness of intermittent iron treatment of two- to six-year-old Jordanian children with iron-deficiency anemia.间歇性铁剂治疗约旦2至6岁缺铁性贫血儿童的疗效
Food Nutr Bull. 2006 Sep;27(3):220-7. doi: 10.1177/156482650602700304.
8
Iron Fortified Complementary Foods Containing a Mixture of Sodium Iron EDTA with Either Ferrous Fumarate or Ferric Pyrophosphate Reduce Iron Deficiency Anemia in 12- to 36-Month-Old Children in a Malaria Endemic Setting: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.在疟疾流行地区,含有乙二胺四乙酸铁钠与富马酸亚铁或焦磷酸铁混合物的铁强化辅食可降低12至36个月儿童的缺铁性贫血:一项整群随机对照试验的二次分析
Nutrients. 2017 Jul 14;9(7):759. doi: 10.3390/nu9070759.
9
[Effectiveness and tolerability of oral liquid ferrous gluconate in iron-deficiency anemia in pregnancy and in the immediate post-partum period: comparison with other liquid or solid formulations containing bivalent or trivalent iron].葡萄糖酸亚铁口服液治疗妊娠及产后早期缺铁性贫血的有效性和耐受性:与其他含二价或三价铁的液体制剂或固体制剂的比较
Minerva Ginecol. 1996 Nov;48(11):511-8.
10
Comparison of ferrous sulfate, polymaltose complex and iron-zinc in iron deficiency anemia.硫酸亚铁、聚麦芽糖复合物与铁锌用于缺铁性贫血的比较
Minerva Pediatr. 2019 Oct;71(5):449-454. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4946.17.04268-2. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Liposomal SunActive versus conventional iron for treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in children aged 2-12 years: a prospective randomized controlled trial.脂质体SunActive与传统铁剂治疗2至12岁儿童缺铁性贫血的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2025 Aug;68(8):608-615. doi: 10.3345/cep.2025.00262. Epub 2025 Jul 18.
2
Comparison of the effect of ferrous sulfate and ferrous gluconate on prophylaxis of iron deficiency in toddlers 6-24 months old: A randomized clinical trial.硫酸亚铁与葡萄糖酸亚铁对6至24个月幼儿缺铁预防效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Nov 26;11:368. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1764_21. eCollection 2022.