Maurin Tiphaine, Bertran Pascal, Delagnes Anne, Boisserie Jean-Renaud
University of Bordeaux/CNRS, PACEA, bâtiment B8, allée Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire, CS 50023, 33615, Pessac cedex, France.
University of Bordeaux/CNRS, PACEA, bâtiment B8, allée Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire, CS 50023, 33615, Pessac cedex, France; Institut national de recherches archéologiques préventives, 140 avenue du Maréchal Leclerc, 33130, Bègles, France.
J Hum Evol. 2017 Oct;111:33-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
The Oldowan archeological record of the Shungura Formation, Member F (Lower Omo valley, Ethiopia) comprises more than one hundred occurrences distributed within archeological complexes, where multiple small spots were found in association with one or two larger occurrences. Such spatial patterning could reflect hominin spatial behavior, repeated occupations within a single sedimentary unit, or taphonomic and/or collection biases. Here we test these hypotheses by way of a geoarcheological and taphonomical analysis using four criteria to assess the preservation of the lithic assemblages: (1) size composition, (2) artifact abrasion, (3) bone abrasion, and (4) orientations of lithic artifacts and bones (i.e., fabrics). We propose a new model of taphonomically induced spatial patterning where the multiple, small, well circumscribed occurrences result primarily from post-depositional processes and therefore do not reflect any underlying behavioral patterns. The large number of archeological occurrences documented in Member F, therefore, corresponds to a limited number of primary occupations (<10). The archeological occupation is mainly restricted to the lower part of Member F and may reflect a single or a small number of occupation episodes, which were located on previous levees of the paleo-Omo River, in nearby floodplain areas, or on the riverbank. This strongly suggests that most of the knapping activities originally took place close to the river. This preference of the Omo toolmakers for riverine environments could explain the scarcity of archeological material in the upper part of Member F that comprises primarily distal floodplain sedimentary facies.
埃塞俄比亚下奥莫河谷舒恩古拉组F段的奥杜威石器考古记录包含一百多处遗迹,分布在考古遗址群中,其中有多个小遗迹点与一两个较大遗迹点相伴出现。这种空间格局可能反映了古人类的空间行为、在单个沉积单元内的反复居住情况,或者埋藏学和/或采集偏差。在这里,我们通过地质考古和埋藏学分析来检验这些假设,使用四个标准来评估石器组合的保存情况:(1)尺寸组成,(2)人工制品磨损情况,(3)骨骼磨损情况,以及(4)石器和骨骼的朝向(即组构)。我们提出了一种新的由埋藏学导致的空间格局模型,其中多个小的、界限分明的遗迹点主要是由沉积后过程造成的,因此并不反映任何潜在的行为模式。因此,F段记录的大量考古遗迹对应着有限的几次主要居住活动(<10次)。考古居住活动主要局限于F段的下部,可能反映了一次或少数几次居住事件,这些事件发生在古奥莫河以前的河漫滩、附近的洪泛区或河岸上。这有力地表明,大多数石器打制活动最初发生在靠近河流的地方。奥莫工具制造者对河流环境的这种偏好可以解释F段上部考古材料的稀缺,该部分主要由远端洪泛平原沉积相组成。