• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥莫河谷下游基比什组的中石器时代考古学:发掘、石器组合及早期智人行为的推断模式

The Middle Stone Age archaeology of the Lower Omo Valley Kibish Formation: excavations, lithic assemblages, and inferred patterns of early Homo sapiens behavior.

作者信息

Shea John J

机构信息

Anthropology Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):448-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.014
PMID:18691735
Abstract

This paper describes the excavation, stratigraphy, and lithic assemblages of Middle Stone Age sites from the Omo Kibish Formation (Lower Omo Valley, southwestern Ethiopia). Three sites were excavated, two in Kibish Member I (KHS and AHS) and one at the base of Member III (BNS). The assemblages are dominated by relatively high-quality raw materials procured as pebbles from local gravels. The principal modes of core preparation are radial/centripetal Levallois and discoidal. Retouched tools are rare. Foliate bifaces are present, as are larger tools, such as handaxes, picks, and lanceolates, but these are more common among surface finds than among excavated assemblages. Middle Stone Age assemblages shed light on the adaptations of the earliest-known Homo sapiens populations in Africa.

摘要

本文描述了来自奥莫基比什组(埃塞俄比亚西南部下奥莫河谷)中石器时代遗址的发掘情况、地层学和石器组合。共发掘了三个遗址,两个位于基比什第一成员层(KHS和AHS),一个位于第三成员层底部(BNS)。这些组合以从当地砾石中获取的相对高质量的卵石原料为主。石核制备的主要方式是放射状/向心勒瓦娄哇技术和盘状技术。经过修整的工具很少见。有叶状双面器,还有较大的工具,如手斧、挖掘器和柳叶状器,但这些在地表发现物中比在发掘出的组合中更为常见。中石器时代的组合为了解非洲最早已知的智人种群的适应情况提供了线索。

相似文献

1
The Middle Stone Age archaeology of the Lower Omo Valley Kibish Formation: excavations, lithic assemblages, and inferred patterns of early Homo sapiens behavior.奥莫河谷下游基比什组的中石器时代考古学:发掘、石器组合及早期智人行为的推断模式
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):448-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.014. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
2
Intrasite spatial variation of the Omo Kibish Middle Stone Age assemblages: artifact refitting and distribution patterns.奥莫基比什中石器时代组合的遗址内空间变化:人工制品拼接与分布模式
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):486-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.016. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
3
Stratigraphy and tephra of the Kibish Formation, southwestern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西南部基比什组地层与火山灰层
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):366-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
4
Paleoanthropology of the Kibish Formation, southern Ethiopia: Introduction.埃塞俄比亚南部基比什组的古人类学:引言
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
5
Correlation of the KHS Tuff of the Kibish Formation to volcanic ash layers at other sites, and the age of early Homo sapiens (Omo I and Omo II).与其他地点火山灰层的对比,以及早期人类(奥莫 I 和奥莫 II)的年代,基比什组的 KHS 凝灰岩。
J Hum Evol. 2012 Oct;63(4):577-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
6
Microstratigraphy of the Kibish hominin sites KHS and PHS, Lower Omo Valley, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚下奥莫河谷基比什古人类遗址KHS和PHS的微观地层学
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):404-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.011. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
7
Sapropels and the age of hominins Omo I and II, Kibish, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚基比什地区奥莫I和奥莫II古人类化石层与腐泥及年代
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):409-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.012. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
8
Quaternary fossil fish from the Kibish Formation, Omo Valley, Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚奥莫河谷基比什组的第四纪化石鱼类。
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):521-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
9
The Middle Stone Age of the northern Kenyan Rift: age and context of new archaeological sites from the Kapedo Tuffs.肯尼亚裂谷北部的中石器时代:来自卡佩多凝灰岩新考古遗址的年代与背景
J Hum Evol. 2008 Oct;55(4):652-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.03.008. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
10
Further new hominin fossils from the Kibish Formation, southwestern Ethiopia.来自埃塞俄比亚西南部基比什组的更多新人亚科化石。
J Hum Evol. 2008 Sep;55(3):444-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Climate seasonality and predictability during the middle stone age and implications for technological diversification in early Homo sapiens.中石器时代的气候季节性与可预测性及其对早期智人技术多样化的影响
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95573-y.
2
Evidence from Tinshemet Cave in Israel suggests behavioural uniformity across Homo groups in the Levantine mid-Middle Palaeolithic circa 130,000-80,000 years ago.来自以色列廷谢梅特洞穴的证据表明,在大约13万至8万年前的黎凡特旧石器时代中期,不同智人群体的行为具有一致性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02110-y.
3
Back(s) to basics: The concept of backing in stone tool technologies for tracing hominins' technical innovations.
回归基础:石器技术中“溯源”概念助力追踪古人类技术创新
Evol Anthropol. 2024 Dec;33(6):e22045. doi: 10.1002/evan.22045. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Evaluating refugia in recent human evolution in Africa.评估非洲近代人类进化中的避难所。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 25;377(1849):20200485. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0485. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
No direct evidence for the presence of Nubian Levallois technology and its association with Neanderthals at Shukbah Cave.在舒克巴赫洞穴中,没有关于努比亚勒瓦娄哇技术存在及其与尼安德特人关联的直接证据。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):1204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05072-7.
6
Directional changes in Levallois core technologies between Eastern Africa, Arabia, and the Levant during MIS 5.在 MIS 5 期间,东非、阿拉伯和黎凡特之间勒瓦娄哇技术的方向变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 1;11(1):11465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90744-z.
7
New insights into early MIS 5 lithic technological behavior in the Levant: Nesher Ramla, Israel as a case study.黎凡特地区早期中石器时代石器技术行为的新见解:以以色列内瑟雷姆拉为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0231109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231109. eCollection 2020.
8
The role of play objects and object play in human cognitive evolution and innovation.游戏物品及物品游戏在人类认知进化与创新中的作用。
Evol Anthropol. 2018 Jan;27(1):46-59. doi: 10.1002/evan.21555.
9
Identifying Major Transitions in the Evolution of Lithic Cutting Edge Production Rates.识别石器切割刃生产速率演变中的主要转变。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0167244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167244. eCollection 2016.
10
Rethinking the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa.重新思考智人走出非洲的扩散过程。
Evol Anthropol. 2015 Jul-Aug;24(4):149-64. doi: 10.1002/evan.21455.