Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Center for Global health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Gut. 2018 Oct;67(10):1805-1812. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313999. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
To compare the risks of postendoscopy outcomes associated with warfarin with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), taking into account heparin bridging and various types of endoscopic procedures.
Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified 16 977 patients who underwent 13 types of high-risk endoscopic procedures and took preoperative warfarin or DOACs from 2014 to 2015. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare postendoscopy GI bleeding and thromboembolism between the warfarin and DOAC groups.
In the propensity score-matched analysis involving 5046 pairs, the warfarin group had a significantly higher proportion of GI bleeding than the DOAC group (12.0% vs 9.9%; p=0.002). No significant difference was observed in thromboembolism (5.4% vs 4.7%) or in-hospital mortality (5.4% vs 4.7%). The risks of GI bleeding and thromboembolism were greater in patients treated with warfarin plus heparin bridging or DOACs plus bridging than in patients treated with DOACs alone. Compared with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, endoscopic mucosal resection and haemostatic procedures including endoscopic variceal ligation or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy were at the highest risk of GI bleeding among the 13 types of endoscopic procedures, whereas those who underwent lower polypectomy endoscopic sphincterotomy or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration were at moderate risk.
The risk of postendoscopy GI bleeding was higher in warfarin than DOAC users. Heparin bridging was associated with an increased risk of bleeding and did not prevent thromboembolism. The bleeding risk varied by the type of endoscopic procedure.
比较与华法林相比,直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)在考虑肝素桥接和各种内镜治疗后内镜检查结果的风险。
使用日本诊断程序组合数据库,我们确定了 16977 名在 2014 年至 2015 年期间接受 13 种高危内镜治疗并术前服用华法林或 DOAC 的患者。对 1:1 倾向评分匹配,以比较华法林组和 DOAC 组内镜检查后胃肠道出血和血栓栓塞的风险。
在涉及 5046 对的倾向评分匹配分析中,华法林组胃肠道出血的比例明显高于 DOAC 组(12.0%比 9.9%;p=0.002)。血栓栓塞(5.4%比 4.7%)或住院死亡率(5.4%比 4.7%)无显著差异。与单独使用 DOAC 相比,华法林加肝素桥接或 DOAC 加桥接治疗的患者胃肠道出血和血栓栓塞的风险更大。与经皮内镜胃造口术相比,内镜黏膜下剥离术、内镜黏膜切除术和包括内镜静脉曲张结扎或内镜注射硬化治疗在内的止血治疗的患者发生胃肠道出血的风险最高,而接受低位息肉切除术、内镜括约肌切开术或内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术的患者风险中等。
与 DOAC 使用者相比,华法林使用者内镜检查后胃肠道出血的风险更高。肝素桥接会增加出血风险,并且不能预防血栓栓塞。出血风险因内镜治疗的类型而异。