Robert A. Berenson (
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1585-1590. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0848.
Vertical integration has been a central feature of health care delivery system change for more than two decades. Recent studies have demonstrated that vertically integrated health care systems raise prices and costs without observable improvements in quality, despite many theoretical reasons why cost control and improved quality might occur. Less well studied is how physicians view their newfound partnerships with hospitals. In this article I review literature findings and other observations on five aspects of vertical integration that affect physicians in their professional and personal lives: patients' access to physicians, physician compensation, autonomy versus system support, medical professionalism and culture, and lifestyle. I conclude that the movement toward physicians' alignment with and employment in vertically integrated systems seems inexorable but that policy should not promote such integration either intentionally or inadvertently. Instead, policy should address the flaws in current payment approaches that reward high prices and excessive service use-outcomes that vertical integration currently produces.
二十多年来,垂直整合一直是医疗保健提供系统变革的核心特征。最近的研究表明,尽管有许多理论上的原因可以解释成本控制和提高质量的可能性,但垂直整合的医疗保健系统在提高质量方面并没有明显改善,反而提高了价格和成本。研究较少的是医生如何看待他们与医院之间新建立的伙伴关系。在本文中,我回顾了关于影响医生专业和个人生活的垂直整合五个方面的文献发现和其他观察结果:患者接触医生的机会、医生薪酬、自主权与系统支持、医学专业精神和文化以及生活方式。我得出的结论是,医生与垂直整合系统结盟并受雇于该系统的趋势似乎不可阻挡,但政策不应有意或无意地促进这种整合。相反,政策应该解决当前支付方式的缺陷,这些缺陷奖励高价和过度服务使用,而垂直整合目前正是产生了这些后果。