Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Mar 9;115(3):268-278. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac233.
The share of oncology practices owned by hospitals (ie, vertically integrated) nearly doubled from 2007 to 2017. We examined how integration between hospitals and oncologists affected care quality, outcomes, and spending among metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data and the Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty, we identified Medicare beneficiaries who initiated systemic therapy for mCRPC between 2008 and 2017 (n = 9172). Primary outcomes included 1) bone-modifying agents (BMA) use, 2) time on systemic therapy, 3) survival, and 4) Medicare spending for the first 3 months following therapy initiation. We used a differences-in-differences approach to estimate the impact of vertical integration on outcomes, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics.
The proportion of patients treated by integrated oncologists increased from 28% to 55% from 2008 to 2017. Vertical integration was associated with an 11.7 percentage point (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.2 to 19.1) increased likelihood of BMA use. There were no satistically significant changes in time on systemic therapy, survival, or total per-patient Medicare spending. Further decomposition showed an increase in outpatient payment ($5190, 95% CI = $1451 to $8930) and decrease in professional service payment (-$4757, 95% CI = -$7644 to -$1870) but no statistically significant changes for other service types (eg, inpatient and prescription drugs).
Vertical integration was associated with statistically significant increased BMA use but not with other cancer outcomes among mCRPC patients. For oncologists who switched service billing from physician offices to outpatient departments, there was no statistically significant change in overall Medicare spending in the first 3 months of therapy initiation. Future studies should extend the investigation to other cancer types and patient outcomes.
从 2007 年到 2017 年,医院(即纵向整合)拥有的肿瘤学实践份额几乎翻了一番。我们研究了医院和肿瘤学家之间的整合如何影响转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者的护理质量、结果和支出。
使用监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险关联数据和医疗保险提供者实践和专业数据,我们确定了 2008 年至 2017 年间开始接受 mCRPC 全身治疗的 Medicare 受益人(n=9172)。主要结果包括 1)骨修饰剂(BMA)的使用,2)系统治疗时间,3)生存,以及 4)治疗开始后 3 个月内的 Medicare 支出。我们使用差异中的差异方法来估计垂直整合对结果的影响,同时调整了患者和提供者的特征。
从 2008 年到 2017 年,接受整合肿瘤学家治疗的患者比例从 28%增加到 55%。纵向整合与 BMA 使用可能性增加 11.7 个百分点(95%置信区间 [CI] = 4.2 至 19.1)相关。系统治疗时间、生存或每位患者 Medicare 总支出均无统计学显著变化。进一步分解显示,门诊付款增加了 5190 美元(95%CI = 1451 美元至 8930 美元),专业服务付款减少了 4757 美元(95%CI = 7644 美元至 1870 美元),但其他服务类型(如住院和处方药)没有统计学显著变化。
纵向整合与 mCRPC 患者的 BMA 使用显著增加相关,但与其他癌症结果无关。对于将服务计费从医生办公室切换到门诊部门的肿瘤学家来说,在治疗开始后的前 3 个月内,总体 Medicare 支出没有统计学显著变化。未来的研究应该将调查扩展到其他癌症类型和患者结果。