• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗保健专业人员对中国医疗体系垂直整合的看法:一项定性研究。

Primary healthcare professionals' perspective on vertical integration of healthcare system in China: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Institute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical Colleage, Beijing, China.

Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical School, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e057063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057063.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057063
PMID:35105599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8808441/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to present the perspectives of primary healthcare professionals (PHPs) on the impacts of implementation of vertical integration and on the underlying interprofessional collaboration process on achievement of the policy goals in China.

DESIGN

A qualitative study involving individual interview and group interview was conducted between 2017 and 2018.

SETTING

Primary healthcare institutions (PHIs) in five counties/districts of China.

PARTICIPANTS

The major participants include 12 heads of PHIs (by 12 individual interviews) and 38 PHPs (by 12 group interviews). We also interviewed other stakeholders including 24 health policy-makers (by 5 group interviews) and 5 hospital leaders (by 5 individual interviews) for triangulation analysis.

RESULTS

Our study indicates that PHPs perceived vertical integration has resulted in improved professional competency, better care coordination and stronger capacity to satisfy patients' needs. The positive impacts have varied between integration types. Contributing factors for such progress are identified at administrative, organisational and service delivery levels. Other perceived effects are a loss of autonomy, increased workload and higher turnover of capable PHPs. Higher level hospitals play a dominant role in the interprofessional collaboration, particularly regarding shared goals, vision and leadership. These findings are different from the evidence in high-income countries. Incentive mechanisms and the balance of power with hospitals management are prominent design elements in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are particularly valuable for other countries with a fragmented health service system and low competency of PHPs as China's experience in integrated care provides a feasible path to strengthen primary care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在呈现基层医疗保健专业人员(PHPs)对实施垂直整合的影响,以及对实现中国政策目标的潜在跨专业合作过程的看法。

设计

这是一项于 2017 年至 2018 年期间进行的定性研究,涉及个人访谈和小组访谈。

地点

中国五个县/区的基层医疗机构(PHI)。

参与者

主要参与者包括 12 名 PHI 负责人(通过 12 次个人访谈)和 38 名 PHPs(通过 12 次小组访谈)。我们还采访了其他利益相关者,包括 24 名卫生政策制定者(通过 5 次小组访谈)和 5 名医院领导(通过 5 次个人访谈)进行三角分析。

结果

我们的研究表明,PHPs 认为垂直整合提高了专业能力,改善了医疗协调,增强了满足患者需求的能力。不同类型的整合带来的积极影响有所不同。在行政、组织和服务提供层面上确定了促进这一进展的因素。其他被认为的影响包括自主权丧失、工作量增加和有能力的 PHPs 离职率增加。上级医院在跨专业合作中发挥主导作用,特别是在共同目标、愿景和领导方面。这些发现与高收入国家的证据不同。激励机制和与医院管理部门的权力平衡是未来设计的突出要素。

结论

我们的研究结果对于那些医疗服务系统分散、PHPs 能力较低的国家尤其有价值,因为中国在综合医疗方面的经验为加强基层医疗提供了一条可行的途径。

相似文献

1
Primary healthcare professionals' perspective on vertical integration of healthcare system in China: a qualitative study.基层医疗保健专业人员对中国医疗体系垂直整合的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e057063. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057063.
2
Healthcare professionals' perspectives of barriers and facilitators in implementing physical activity programmes delivered to cancer survivors in a shared-care model: a qualitative study.医护人员对在共病管理模式下为癌症幸存者实施身体活动方案的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3429-3440. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05108-1. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
3
Effects of Vertical Integration Reform on Primary Healthcare Institutions in China: Evidence From a Longitudinal Study.纵向整合改革对中国基层医疗机构的影响:来自纵向研究的证据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1835-1843. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.93. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Job satisfaction of the primary healthcare providers with expanded roles in the context of health service integration in rural China: a cross-sectional mixed methods study.中国农村卫生服务整合背景下扩大角色的基层医疗服务提供者的工作满意度:一项横断面混合方法研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Sep 2;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0403-3.
5
Barriers and facilitators to the integration of depression services in primary care in Vietnam: a mixed methods study.越南初级保健中抑郁症服务整合的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3416-z.
6
Patients' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between health care professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review.患者对住院期间医护专业人员跨专业协作的看法:一项定性系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jun;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00121.
7
Healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes to care coordination across health sectors: an interview study.医疗保健专业人员在跨卫生部门协调照护方面的经验和态度:一项访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03200-6.
8
What are the key contextual factors when preparing for successful implementation of assistive living technology in primary elderly care? A case study from Norway.在为老年人初级护理中成功实施辅助生活技术做准备时,关键的背景因素有哪些?来自挪威的一个案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 7;7(9):e015455. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015455.
9
Building COPD care on shaky ground: a mixed methods study from Swedish primary care professional perspective.在不稳定的基础上构建慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理:一项基于瑞典初级保健专业人员视角的混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2393-y.
10
Facilitators and barriers to implement the family doctor contracting services in China: findings from a qualitative study.中国实施家庭医生签约服务的促进因素与障碍:一项定性研究的结果
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):e032444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032444.

引用本文的文献

1
The capacity and influencing factors of primary health care services in China.中国基层医疗卫生服务的能力及影响因素
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0331645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331645. eCollection 2025.
2
The equivalent value (EV)-based workload assessment of primary healthcare workers in Beijing, China.中国北京基层医护人员基于等效值(EV)的工作量评估。
Hum Resour Health. 2025 Jan 9;23(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00970-5.
3
Evaluating Leadership Dynamics: A Comprehensive Cross-Sectional Study of Madinah's Primary Healthcare Centers.评估领导动态:麦地那初级医疗中心的全面横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 19;16(8):e67199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67199. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Comparative Study on the Satisfaction of Healthcare Service Providers with the Synergistic Development of Rural Healthcare Systems in China: Medical Alliance Counties vs. Non-Medical Alliance Counties.中国农村医疗体系协同发展中医疗服务提供者满意度的比较研究:医联体县与非医联体县
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jun 20;24(2):26. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7677. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
5
Patients' and Care Professionals' Evaluation of the Effect of a Hospital Group on Integrated Care in Chinese Urban Health Systems: A Propensity Score Matching and Difference-in-differences Regression Approach.患者与护理专业人员对医院集团对中国城市卫生系统综合护理效果的评价:倾向得分匹配与双重差分回归方法
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7897. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7897. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
Effects of vertical integration on the healthcare system in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.垂直整合对中国医疗体系的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jan 9;39(1):66-79. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad085.
7
Explaining the intention and behaviours of interinstitutional collaboration in chronic disease management among health care personnel: a cross-sectional study from Fujian Province, China.解释医疗机构间在慢性病管理方面合作的意图和行为:来自中国福建省的一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 11;23(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09453-0.
8
Horizontal Integration and Financing Reform of Rural Primary Care in China: A Model for Low-Resource and Remote Settings.中国农村基层医疗的横向整合与筹资改革:面向资源匮乏和偏远地区的模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148356.

本文引用的文献

1
Measures to strengthen primary health-care systems in low- and middle-income countries.加强中低收入国家基层医疗保健系统的措施。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):781-791. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.252742. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
2
'Hybrid' top down bottom up health system innovation in rural China: A qualitative analysis.中国农村“混合式”上下结合的卫生系统创新:定性分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239307. eCollection 2020.
3
Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations.中国基层医疗保健的质量:挑战与建议。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1802-1812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30122-7.
4
Vertical Integration Likely Increases Spending, but Does It Also Improve Quality of Care?纵向整合可能会增加支出,但它也能提高医疗质量吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):630-632. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05602-6.
5
Assessing perceived quality of primary care under hospital-township health centre integration: A cross-sectional study in China.评估医院-乡镇卫生院一体化模式下的基层医疗感知质量:一项中国的横断面研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Jan;35(1):e196-e209. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2965. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
Facilitators and barriers to implement the family doctor contracting services in China: findings from a qualitative study.中国实施家庭医生签约服务的促进因素与障碍:一项定性研究的结果
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):e032444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032444.
7
Medicare Spending after 3 Years of the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共享储蓄计划实施 3 年后的医疗保险支出。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1139-1149. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1803388. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Factors influencing choice of health system access level in China: A systematic review.影响中国卫生系统就诊层级选择的因素:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 10;13(8):e0201887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201887. eCollection 2018.
9
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
A systematic review of vertical integration and quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes.一项关于垂直整合与医疗质量、效率和以患者为中心的结果的系统评价。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2019 Apr/Jun;44(2):159-173. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000197.