Suppr超能文献

需要高额人头费支付以推动初级保健向主动式团队和非就诊护理转变。

High Levels Of Capitation Payments Needed To Shift Primary Care Toward Proactive Team And Nonvisit Care.

机构信息

Sanjay Basu (

Russell S. Phillips is director of the Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, in Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1599-1605. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0367.

Abstract

Capitated payments in the form of fixed monthly payments to cover all of the costs associated with delivering primary care could encourage primary care practices to transform the way they deliver care. Using a microsimulation model incorporating data from 969 US practices, we sought to understand whether shifting to team- and non-visit-based care is financially sustainable for practices under traditional fee-for-service, capitated payment, or a mix of the two. Practice revenues and costs were computed for fee-for-service payments and a range of capitated payments, before and after the substitution of team- and non-visit-based services for low-complexity in-person physician visits. The substitution produced financial losses for simulated practices under fee-for-service payment of $42,398 per full-time-equivalent physician per year; however, substitution produced financial gains under capitated payment in 95 percent of cases, if more than 63 percent of annual payments were capitated. Shifting to capitated payment might create an incentive for practices to increase their delivery of team- and non-visit-based primary care, if capitated payment levels were sufficiently high.

摘要

按固定月费支付的总额制付款方式可以支付提供初级保健的所有费用,这可能会鼓励初级保健机构改变提供护理的方式。我们使用一个微观模拟模型,纳入了来自 969 家美国医疗机构的数据,旨在了解在传统按服务收费和总额制付款或两者混合的模式下,向基于团队和非就诊的服务转变是否在财务上可持续。在将基于团队和非就诊的服务替代低复杂性的当面就诊后,我们计算了按服务收费和一系列总额制付款的医疗机构收入和成本。对于按服务收费的模拟医疗机构来说,这种替代导致每位全职医生每年损失 42398 美元;但如果超过 63%的年度支付是总额制的,那么在 95%的情况下,总额制付款会产生财务收益。如果总额制付款水平足够高,向总额制付款的转变可能会为医疗机构增加基于团队和非就诊的初级保健服务提供激励。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验