Vincent M D, Breadner D, Cripps M C, Jonker D J, Klimo P, Biagi J J, Lam W, O'Connell A, Whiston F, Stitt L, Welch S A
London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON.
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON.
Curr Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(4):e261-e268. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3516. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Combination chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes in trials of selected fit patients with advanced colorectal cancer (acrc). For older or less-fit patients, combination chemotherapy is associated with greater toxicity and less benefit. Capecitabine monotherapy is a reasonable option for those patients, but the optimal dose remains controversial.
A multicentre phase i/ii trial of reduced-dose capecitabine (2000 mg/m, days 1-14 every 21 days) was conducted in 221 patients representing one or more of the following subsets: age greater than 65 years ( = 167), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ecog) performance status of 1 or greater ( = 139), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (ldh) ( = 105), or prior pelvic radiation ( = 54). Based on phase i results, patients with prior pelvic radiation received capecitabine 750 mg/m twice daily. The goal was to ascertain efficacy in a design that was unlikely to cause high levels of toxicity.
Median age in the patient cohort was 72 years. A median of 5 and a mean of 8 capecitabine cycles were given (range: 0-50 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 25% of patients during the first 3 cycles (8.1% hand-foot syndrome, 7.7% diarrhea). The response rate was 13.6%, with a 69.7% disease control rate. Median progression-free survival (pfs) was 5.6 months. Post progression, 56 patients received further capecitabine monotherapy (median of 4 additional cycles). Median overall survival duration for the patients was 14.3 months. Median survival was significantly higher for those who, at baseline, had an ecog performance status of 0 (compared with 1 or more) and normal ldh (compared with elevated ldh).
Toxicity is less with dose-reduced capecitabine than with historical full-dose capecitabine, with only a small trade-off in efficacy, seen as a lower objective response rate. The improved tolerability could lead to an increased number of cycles of therapy, and pfs appears to be consistently higher at the lower dose. Those observations should, in the absence of a head-to-head clinical trial, be viewed as compelling evidence that 1000 mg/m, or even 750 mg/m, twice daily is an appropriate dose in elderly or frail patients with acrc.
在选定的适合的晚期结直肠癌(acrc)患者试验中,联合化疗与改善的预后相关。对于老年或身体状况较差的患者,联合化疗会带来更大的毒性且益处较少。卡培他滨单药治疗对这些患者来说是一个合理的选择,但最佳剂量仍存在争议。
对221例患者进行了一项多中心I/II期试验,这些患者代表以下一个或多个亚组:年龄大于65岁(n = 167)、东部肿瘤协作组(ecog)体能状态为1或更高(n = 139)、乳酸脱氢酶(ldh)升高(n = 105)或既往接受盆腔放疗(n = 54)。根据I期结果,既往接受盆腔放疗的患者接受卡培他滨750 mg/m²,每日两次。目标是在一个不太可能导致高毒性水平的设计中确定疗效。
患者队列的中位年龄为72岁。给予的卡培他滨周期中位数为5个,平均为8个(范围:0 - 50个周期)。在前3个周期中,25%的患者出现3级或4级毒性(8.1%为手足综合征,7.7%为腹泻)。缓解率为13.6%,疾病控制率为69.7%。中位无进展生存期(pfs)为5.6个月。疾病进展后,56例患者接受了进一步的卡培他滨单药治疗(中位数为额外4个周期)。患者的中位总生存期为14.3个月。对于那些基线时ecog体能状态为0(与1或更高相比)且ldh正常(与升高相比)的患者,中位生存期显著更高。
与既往全剂量卡培他滨相比,降低剂量的卡培他滨毒性较小,仅在疗效上有小的权衡,表现为较低的客观缓解率。耐受性的改善可能导致治疗周期数增加,并且较低剂量时pfs似乎始终更高。在没有头对头临床试验的情况下,这些观察结果应被视为有力证据,表明每日两次1000 mg/m²甚至750 mg/m²是老年或体弱acrc患者的合适剂量。