Kocer Naci, Mondel Prabath Kumar, Yamac Elif, Kavak Ayse, Kizilkilic Osman, Islak Civan
Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Kocamustafapasa, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Dermatology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Sağlam Cad. No: 11, Zuhuratbaba Mah., 34147, Bakirköy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Neuroradiology. 2017 Nov;59(11):1171-1178. doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1910-3. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Flow diverters are increasingly used in the treatment of complex and giant intracranial aneurysms. However, they are associated with complications like late aneurysmal rupture. Additionally, flow diverters show focal structural decrease in luminal diameter without any intimal hyperplasia. This resembles a "fish mouth" when viewed en face. In this pilot study, we tested the hypothesis of a possible association between flow diverter fish-mouthing and delayed-type hypersensitivity to its metal constituents.
We retrospectively reviewed patient records from our center between May 2010 and November 2015. A total of nine patients had flow diverter fish mouthing. A control group of 25 patients was selected. All study participants underwent prospective patch test to detect hypersensitivity to flow diverter metal constituents. Analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis and Wilcoxon sign rank sum test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test variables to predict flow diverter fish mouthing.
The association between flow diverter fish mouthing and positive patch test was not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, history of allergy and maximum aneurysm size category was associated with flow diverter fish mouthing. This was further confirmed on Wilcoxon sign rank sum test.
The study showed statistically significant association between flow diverter fish mouthing and history of contact allergy and a small aneurysmal size. Further large-scale studies are needed to detect a statistically significant association between flow diverter fish mouthing and patch test. We recommend early and more frequent follow-up imaging in patients with contact allergy to detect flow diverter fish mouthing and its subsequent evolution.
血流导向装置在复杂和巨大颅内动脉瘤的治疗中应用日益广泛。然而,它们与诸如动脉瘤晚期破裂等并发症相关。此外,血流导向装置显示管腔直径有局灶性结构减小,且无任何内膜增生。从正面看时,这类似于“鱼嘴”。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们检验了血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象与对其金属成分的迟发型超敏反应之间可能存在关联的假设。
我们回顾性分析了2010年5月至2015年11月期间我们中心的患者记录。共有9例患者出现血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象。选取了25例患者作为对照组。所有研究参与者均接受了前瞻性斑贴试验,以检测对血流导向装置金属成分的超敏反应。使用逻辑回归分析和Wilcoxon符号秩和检验进行分析。进行单因素和多因素分析以检验预测血流导向装置“鱼嘴”现象的变量。
血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象与斑贴试验阳性之间的关联无统计学意义。在多因素分析中,过敏史和最大动脉瘤大小类别与血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象相关。这在Wilcoxon符号秩和检验中得到了进一步证实。
该研究显示血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象与接触性过敏史及较小的动脉瘤大小之间存在统计学意义上的关联。需要进一步的大规模研究来检测血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象与斑贴试验之间的统计学意义上的关联。我们建议对有接触性过敏的患者进行早期且更频繁的随访成像,以检测血流导向装置的“鱼嘴”现象及其后续演变。