West Virginia University.
Tufts University.
J Res Adolesc. 2017 Jun;27(2):328-343. doi: 10.1111/jora.12288. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Residential mobility is generally viewed as an adverse event for adolescents' development. Less is known about whether moving during adolescence, childhood, or both periods explains this connection and whether the extent of mobility matters. Analytic shortcomings with much of the research call into question extant findings. We examined associations between childhood, adolescent, and child-adolescent mobility and adolescents' achievement (math and reading) and behavior problems (internalizing and externalizing). With a multisite, longitudinal sample (N = 1,056), we employed propensity score methods, which mitigate concerns about selection bias on observed variables, to investigate relationships. Results suggest that multiple, child-adolescent movers had more internalizing problems in adolescence than their stable peers, but did not differ on externalizing problems or achievement.
居住流动性通常被视为青少年发展的不利事件。关于在青少年时期、儿童时期或这两个时期搬家是否可以解释这种联系,以及流动性的程度是否重要,人们知之甚少。许多研究都存在分析上的缺陷,这使得现有的研究结果受到质疑。我们研究了儿童期、青少年期和儿童-青少年期流动性与青少年的成就(数学和阅读)和行为问题(内化和外化)之间的关系。在一个多地点、纵向样本(N=1056)中,我们采用倾向评分方法来研究关系,这种方法减轻了对观察变量选择偏差的关注。结果表明,与稳定的同龄人相比,多次儿童-青少年搬家者在青少年时期的内化问题更多,但在外化问题或成就方面没有差异。