O'Connor Bridget, Kerr Claire, Shields Nora, Imms Christine
a School of Allied Health , Australian Catholic University , Melbourne , Australia.
b School of Nursing and Midwifery , Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(1):53-65. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1373376. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
Evidence-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy are not widely used by healthcare professionals in day-to-day practice. This study aimed to examine allied health practitioner experiences, perceptions, and use of assessments for children with cerebral palsy.
A mixed methods study was conducted in two rehabilitation organisations. Three focus group interviews explored therapists' assessment experiences with data analysed using interpretive description. Assessment practices of therapists (n = 55) were assessed through self-report questionnaire and case-file audit of children with cerebral palsy (n = 44).
Emergent themes described therapists' motivation to use evidence-based assessments on a behavioural continuum - I don't; I can't; I try; I do; We do; influenced by assessment satisfaction, child and family collaboration, organisational expectation, research fit, and time dedication. Only two of fifteen audited assessments were documented in more than 50% of files. Use was higher where assessments positively connected therapists, children and parents, and use was organisationally endorsed. The Cultural Cone for evidence-based assessment behaviour was conceptualised.
"Engagement in" assessment appears to require a conceptual shift by therapists and organisations to understanding assessment as part of, not an adjunct to, therapy. The Cultural Cone framework may assist therapists and services in designing strategies to promote evidence-based assessment behaviours. Implications for rehabilitation Therapists' can reflect on where they are positioned on the "use continuum" in the Cultural Cone framework, and consider the contextual influences contained in this framework to understand their motivation to use evidence-based assessments. Routine use of evidenced-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy by allied health practitioners remains generally low and therapists and service organisations need to consider ways to increase use. Where possible, therapists' should choose assessment tools that fully engage children and families and themselves in the assessment process. The Cultural Cone framework may be used to assist therapists and organisations identify and design site specific strategies to increase evidence-based assessment use in day-to-day practice.
医疗保健专业人员在日常实践中并未广泛使用基于证据的脑瘫儿童评估方法。本研究旨在探讨专职医疗人员对脑瘫儿童评估的经验、看法及使用情况。
在两个康复机构开展了一项混合方法研究。进行了三次焦点小组访谈,探讨治疗师的评估经验,并采用解释性描述对数据进行分析。通过自我报告问卷和对脑瘫儿童(n = 44)的病例档案审核,评估了治疗师(n = 55)的评估实践。
新出现的主题描述了治疗师在行为连续体上使用基于证据的评估的动机——我不使用;我不能使用;我尝试使用;我使用;我们使用;这受到评估满意度、儿童及家庭合作、组织期望、研究契合度和时间投入的影响。在15项经审核的评估中,只有两项在超过50%的档案中有记录。当评估能积极地将治疗师、儿童和家长联系起来且得到组织认可时,其使用频率更高。构建了基于证据的评估行为的文化锥模型。
“参与”评估似乎要求治疗师和组织进行观念转变,将评估理解为治疗的一部分而非辅助手段。文化锥框架可能有助于治疗师和服务机构设计促进基于证据的评估行为的策略。对康复的启示治疗师可以思考自己在文化锥框架中“使用连续体”上的位置,并考虑该框架中包含的背景影响因素,以理解自己使用基于证据的评估的动机。专职医疗人员对脑瘫儿童常规使用基于证据的评估的情况总体上仍然较低,治疗师和服务机构需要考虑增加使用的方法。在可能的情况下,治疗师应选择能让儿童、家庭及自身充分参与评估过程的评估工具。文化锥框架可用于帮助治疗师和机构识别和设计针对具体场所的策略,以增加日常实践中基于证据的评估的使用。