Olsson Greger, Frozanpor Farshad, Lundell Lars, Enochsson Lars, Ansorge Christoph, Del Chiaro Marco, Reuterwall-Hansson Marcus, Shetye Alysha, Arnelo Urban
Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital and Division of Surgery, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Surgery, Highland Hospital, Eksjö, Sweden.
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E798-E808. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110565. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with periampullary tumors and jaundice has been popularized to improve the quality of life and minimize the risks associated with subsequent radical surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible superiority of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) over plastic stents, by comparing the amount of bacteria in intraoperatively collected bile and using this variable as a proxy for the efficacy of the respective biliary drainage modalities.
In this randomized clinical trial, 92 patients with obstructive jaundice were enrolled; 45 were allocated to the plastic stent group and 47 to the SEMS group. The primary outcome was the extent and magnitude of biliary bacterial growth at the time of surgical exploration. Secondary outcomes were: macroscopic grading of inflammation of the stented bile ducts, occurrence of adverse events after stenting, stent dysfunction, recognized surgical complexities, and incidence of postoperative complications.
The patients were well matched regarding clinical and disease-specific characteristics. At surgery, there were no group differences in the bacterial amount and composition of the bile cultures or the perceived difficulty of surgical dissection. During the preoperative biliary drainage period, more instances of stent dysfunction requiring stent replacement were recorded in the plastic stent group (19 % vs. 0 %; = 0.03). Postoperative complications in patients who underwent curative surgery were more common in patients with plastic stents (72 % vs. 52 %), among which clinically significant leakage from the pancreatic anastomoses seemed to predominate (12 % vs. 3.7 %); however, none of these differences in postoperative adverse events reached statistical significance.
This randomized clinical study was unable to demonstrate any superiority of SEMS in the efficacy of preoperative bile drainage, as assessed by the amount of bacteria in the intraoperatively collected bile. However, some data in favor of SEMS were observed among the clinical secondary outcomes variables (preoperative stent exchange rates) without increases in local inflammatory reactions.
壶腹周围肿瘤合并黄疸患者的术前胆道引流已得到广泛应用,以改善生活质量并降低后续根治性手术相关风险。本研究旨在通过比较术中采集胆汁中的细菌数量,并将此变量作为各自胆道引流方式疗效的替代指标,探讨自膨式金属支架(SEMS)相对于塑料支架的潜在优势。
在这项随机临床试验中,纳入了92例梗阻性黄疸患者;45例被分配至塑料支架组,47例被分配至SEMS组。主要结局是手术探查时胆道细菌生长的程度和数量。次要结局包括:置入支架胆管的炎症宏观分级、支架置入后的不良事件发生情况、支架功能障碍、手术复杂性以及术后并发症发生率。
患者在临床和疾病特异性特征方面匹配良好。手术时,胆汁培养的细菌数量和组成或手术解剖的感知难度在两组之间无差异。在术前胆道引流期间,塑料支架组记录到更多需要更换支架的支架功能障碍情况(19%对0%;P = 0.03)。接受根治性手术患者的术后并发症在塑料支架患者中更常见(72%对52%),其中胰腺吻合口的临床显著渗漏似乎占主导(12%对3.7%);然而,这些术后不良事件的差异均未达到统计学意义。
这项随机临床研究未能证明,根据术中采集胆汁中的细菌数量评估,SEMS在术前胆汁引流疗效方面具有任何优势。然而,在临床次要结局变量(术前支架更换率)中观察到一些支持SEMS的数据,且局部炎症反应未增加。